| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aran Abbas
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
88
   |
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:31:00 -
[31] - Quote
Wolfica wrote:ok. still think missiles should be faster though.
I felt a great disturbance in the Forums, as if millions of HAV drivers and dropship pilots suddenly cried out in terror and were never silenced. |
Wolfica
Planetary Response Organization
50
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
you guys are the reason mom and dad got a divorce. 
no offense to any one who has had/going through a divorce |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
286
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:32:00 -
[33] - Quote
Wolfica wrote:ok. still think missiles should be faster though.
but to the bigger question
Pegasis why you be hating on Cheetos?
Im not hating I could have said pringles or dorietos just any snack I was thinking of. |
Wolfica
Planetary Response Organization
50
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:33:00 -
[34] - Quote
well if LAV's are faster then missles. top speed 106mph base. they missiles are going way to slow |
Niuvo
The Phoenix Federation
12
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
Guys, guys, I want to fly jets and get into badass dogfights and yes I want to strafe the ground. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
286
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
Iv had no problems popping malitia lavs with the starteranti armour fit its all down to poditioning . The logi lavs are the invincible ones and rightly so as they are the only true proto vehicle avalable. |
Aran Abbas
Goonfeet
Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
89
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 11:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
Wolfica wrote:well if LAV's are faster then missles. top speed 106mph base. they missiles are going way to slow
I'm not a vehicle driver. I'm usually the one with the swarm launcher. But even I think those poor bastards deserve a break, and speeding up swarm would make even me pity them.. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1641
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 18:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Air-to-air will have their own turret types. If I fit an autocannon on my fighter, I'm sure as hell going to be able to do some passes on infantry. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
1970
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
Aran Abbas wrote:They should fight other jets up in the sky and destroy aerial objectives that HELP the mercs on the ground, but they should be too fast moving to reliably hit any ground targets. For the sake of not messing up the balance, leave the ground kills to mercs, ground vehicles, and dropships.
Yeah, what we need are Bomber Dropships.
Those are a really good idea.
 |
Sgt Buttscratch
G I A N T
EoN.
166
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:34:00 -
[40] - Quote
Aran Abbas wrote:They should fight other jets up in the sky and destroy aerial objectives that HELP the mercs on the ground, but they should be too fast moving to reliably hit any ground targets. For the sake of not messing up the balance, leave the ground kills to mercs, ground vehicles, and dropships.
Napalm |
|
|
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1821
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:35:00 -
[41] - Quote
Target painting, make it happen CCP |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
291
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sgt Buttscratch wrote:Aran Abbas wrote:They should fight other jets up in the sky and destroy aerial objectives that HELP the mercs on the ground, but they should be too fast moving to reliably hit any ground targets. For the sake of not messing up the balance, leave the ground kills to mercs, ground vehicles, and dropships. Napalm
I love the smell of napalm in the morning |
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
199
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Looks like the first QQ/ nerf the jet thread has started...WTF
W
T
F
We dont even have jets yet and the blueberries are allready afraid of death from above .
Once again WTF Massive fu@#ing face palm.
Thing is if they can push drones up to 3 km a sec in EVE how fast are jets supposed to go? |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
1971
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:52:00 -
[44] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Target painting, make it happen CCP
You wouldn't need that unless we had guided bombs, which I somehow doubt we'll have.
Unguided would be fine for Fighters. That way you'll only get kills if you complete the run properly, and you'll have to commit even with AA fire coming up at you, so using them will be risky. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
291
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 19:59:00 -
[45] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Looks like the first QQ/ nerf the jet thread has started...WTF
W
T
F
We dont even have jets yet and the blueberries are allready afraid of death from above .
Once again WTF Massive fu@#ing face palm. Thing is if they can push drones up to 3 km a sec in EVE how fast are jets supposed to go?
Yes but that is in space. When inside the atmosphere I think 3km a second would enevidably cause the jet dammage via friction generated from flying through whatever atmosphere the planet has . |
Skipper Jones
ZionTCD
121
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 20:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
KAMIKAZE. It's what I did in battlefield, It's what I'll do in Dust |
Denidil Taureran
Turalyon Plus
11
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 21:10:00 -
[47] - Quote
sorry nubcakes, i'll be bombing your ass from the sky in a close air support fighter |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers
EoN.
388
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 21:17:00 -
[48] - Quote
In a 16v16 map what would be the point of aerial attack vehicles if they didn't interact with ground troops at all? It would be like tactical orbital support... token and pointless.
In a 32 v 32 or a 64 v 64 setting... maybe you could get away with it. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1847
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 21:18:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Cosgar wrote:Target painting, make it happen CCP You wouldn't need that unless we had guided bombs, which I somehow doubt we'll have. Unguided would be fine for Fighters. That way you'll only get kills if you complete the run properly, and you'll have to commit even with AA fire coming up at you, so using them will be risky.
Not that kind of target painting, this kind of target painting. But laser guiding gunships would be pretty awesome. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries
DARKSTAR ARMY
297
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 22:23:00 -
[50] - Quote
I really like cosgars idea for antivehicle fitred jets. For the anti infantry (spray and pray strafing runs) either long range lowdammage high rate of fire blasters or specilised surface to air chain missiles. |
|
|
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
1978
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 22:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Cosgar wrote:Target painting, make it happen CCP You wouldn't need that unless we had guided bombs, which I somehow doubt we'll have. Unguided would be fine for Fighters. That way you'll only get kills if you complete the run properly, and you'll have to commit even with AA fire coming up at you, so using them will be risky. Not that kind of target painting, this kind of target painting. But laser guiding gunships would be pretty awesome.
Ah, enhancing damage done against vehicles via painting. Intriguing!
As far as Fighters go, you'll notice that the original concept art had a belly bay for a secondary turret, and a set of small turrets on the front.
Why not keep that layout, keep the front mounted turrets, and have a belly bay for other weapon types?
Maybe add a new market category for all non-turret vehicle weapons and label it Ordnance. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |