Reality.
This is not it.

Nerf Reality pls.

My brain hurts and my eyes feel like they are on fire from reading what the OP wrote.

Working as intended.

You are wrong on both a reality and game balance standpoint.

Don't complain about tank vs AV costs.
Offense is always the cheaper method.
Abrams tanks that cost 8.58 million dollars are destroyed by 300 dollars RPG.
Home made rockets that cost 50 dollars more or less take batteries that cost 50 million dollars + 50k dollars per rocket launch.
894,000 dollars for a Torpedo that can bring down a ship that costs 3.45 billion dollars.
AA missiles that cost 9 million dollars take down jets that cost 100mil+.

This is just the reality of things.

Also, bringing out AV takes a gun off the battlefield, which makes for easy targets for your team mates.
Yeah yeah AV grenades don't, but they need to be looked at that's for sure.

Also, I'm not saying the current AV vs Tank situation is balanced.
It definitely should be looked at.

No prototype tanks available, prototype AV available. Not trying to make an argument in favor of either side, I just felt like pointing that out.

Hmm by your logic should all troops be dead after a few bullets? Why are structures indestructible? Hmm perhaps this isn't reality?

Don't complain about tank vs AV costs.
Offense is always the cheaper method.
Abrams tanks that cost 8.58 million dollars are destroyed by 300 dollars RPG.
Home made rockets that cost 50 dollars more or less take batteries that cost 50 million dollars + 50k dollars per rocket launch.
894,000 dollars for a Torpedo that can bring down a ship that costs 3.45 billion dollars.
AA missiles that cost 9 million dollars take down jets that cost 100mil+.

This is just the reality of things.

Also, bringing out AV takes a gun off the battlefield, which makes for easy targets for your team mates.
Yeah yeah AV grenades don't, but they need to be looked at that's for sure.

Also, I'm not saying the current AV vs Tank situation is balanced.
It definitely should be looked at.

Don't complain about tank vs AV costs.
Offense is always the cheaper method.
Abrams tanks that cost 8.58 million dollars are destroyed by 300 dollars RPG.
Home made rockets that cost 50 dollars more or less take batteries that cost 50 million dollars + 50k dollars per rocket launch.
894,000 dollars for a Torpedo that can bring down a ship that costs 3.45 billion dollars.
AA missiles that cost 9 million dollars take down jets that cost 100mil+.

This is just the reality of things.

Also, bringing out AV takes a gun off the battlefield, which makes for easy targets for your team mates.
Yeah yeah AV grenades don't, but they need to be looked at that's for sure.

Also, I'm not saying the current AV vs Tank situation is balanced.
It definitely should be looked at.

Don't complain about tank vs AV costs.
Offense is always the cheaper method.
Abrams tanks that cost 8.58 million dollars are destroyed by 300 dollars RPG.
Home made rockets that cost 50 dollars more or less take batteries that cost 50 million dollars + 50k dollars per rocket launch.
894,000 dollars for a Torpedo that can bring down a ship that costs 3.45 billion dollars.
AA missiles that cost 9 million dollars take down jets that cost 100mil+.

This is just the reality of things.

Also, bringing out AV takes a gun off the battlefield, which makes for easy targets for your team mates.
Yeah yeah AV grenades don't, but they need to be looked at that's for sure.

Also, I'm not saying the current AV vs Tank situation is balanced.
It definitely should be looked at.

AV shouldn't be nerfed, tanks should be buffed.

Because otherwise AV would just become weaker Vs LAVs, and we all know how much bitching that would cause.

Give us Proto tanks with +4k Hull HP, more PG and CPU and more slots, also give us our old skill bonuses back (+25% PG and +25% Shield/Armour)