|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1856
   |
Posted - 2013.06.04 02:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
There is now a meeting to be scheduled soon asking for feedback of specific parts of the game with the team involved. If successful this may open up other teams to start approaching the CPM and the Community for feedback.
No offense Ironwolf, but if they ask questions like "what do you think about X (like say caldari logi, tac rifle, etc)?" I will lose every ounce of respect you still muster if you give them any opinion besides ASK THE COMMUNITY in a controlled manner. None of you have the 1000's of hours some of us have in individual playstyles, and some of you don't admit how little they know. If you catch youself thinking "Well this is bad, did you consider this... etc." STOP and think about is this something CCP needs to keep behind closed doors. If the answer is no, please remind them that you have plenty of legitimate functions and concerns to talk over and direct them to address the playerbase as is proper. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1856
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 03:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:ReGnYuM wrote:Lets not get ahead of ourselves here IWS
CPM0 main purpose was to help build the stepping stones to a player elected council, which BTW I have still not seen one single draft.
Right right, however I don't want CPM 1's day one feeling utterly useless on their portion either. There is quite a bit of foundation building going on right now.
Yeah, it's about building a good position for your successor, not about feeling important right now... |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1857
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 04:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:IWS - I only want to know one thing from you.
Are they using mostly pub data to make game changing decisions that effect competitive level play?
|
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1857
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 06:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:But, no, you're probably totally informed or else you wouldn't comment. 
Just because he got a tag doesn't mean he's not the biggest troll here. He thinks he's hot **** and won't be told otherwise ever. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1857
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 06:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:I'm not referring to you, specifically, Mith. Only to the the terrible posts that jumped on the bandwagon and were quick to wail about the most extreme possibilities without showing any of the reluctance to jump to conlusions that is needed by community and CPM alike while we await more information from CCP. OP's can have legitimate questions and still see the thread end up like Lord of the Flies.
I'm a customer. I paid money to CCP. I expect the product to work a certain way. If it doesn't I expect my feedback to be respected. I'm under no obligation to go through you and frankly your forum attitude is atrocious. In game you are a respectful and well listening (you don't have to agree to listen! you understand this well). On the forums you are a douche. Why the dichotomy? |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
1857
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 06:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote: why are people like this continuing with this tactic month after month after month?
...Because they're still waiting for it to finally work. And it won't.
The sad, demonstrable truth of DUST 514 development is this is wrong. The existence of the CPM itself is testament. |
|
|
| |
|