I am enjoying the fact WTF is continuously attacking Red Star. territory. Word on the street is that they have been attacking Red Star. for the past 3 days and haven't yet secured a single district with around 500 million ISK spent on just on clones.

Personally I think this is a beautiful thing. It shows a corps ability to wage war and another corps ability to defend.

I say yay to PC griefing. We should keep pummeling a corp till it breaks down.

Should we have a cooldown timer so no corp can attack a district say more than 3 or 4 times?

Discuss!

No, let the war continue, No clone $$$ for anyone.

If people want to keep wasting money attacking let it be that way this is war and you need to be strategic you won't have all that isk forever but I do enjoy the constant competition :D

To me it would make more sense for a clone loss to occur in this situation than from transport over long journeys. If someone attacked from the same place over and over again, a military would take precaution and fortify defences against their actions.

I am enjoying the fact WTF is continuously attacking Red Star. territory. Word on the street is that they have been attacking Red Star. for the past 3 days and haven't yet secured a single district with around 500 million ISK spent on just on clones.

Personally I think this is a beautiful thing. It shows a corps ability to wage war and another corps ability to defend.

I say yay to PC griefing. We should keep pummeling a corp till it breaks down.

Should we have a cooldown timer so no corp can attack a district say more than 3 or 4 times?

Discuss!

I think you will find that WTF should be the owners of these districts, however they seem to be bugged and havent changed hands.

CCP is aware of this and the possible cause for this issue

Sir Meode it's okay bro they can have that one district after 500million isk and to top it all off the last battle they brought all SI ringers that is way too funny if they can't take losing to 16 R*S 3x in a row it's fine.

Wars sometimes don't end in 6 minutes.

Really? Why would we hire people? We only have alliance members help us when we don't have enough members and they did into beat us? Why doesn't SI come fight us sir Meode instead using WTFs money? Last I checked we got offered to join cronos by your leader? Any knowledge of this?

Really? Why would we hire people? We only have alliance members help us when we don't have enough members and they did into beat us? Why doesn't SI come fight us sir Meode instead using WTFs money? Last I checked we got offered to join cronos by your leader? Any knowledge of this?

Dont worry all you base are belong to us soon enough

I hope so sir Meode maybe then we will actually fight you SI instead of all there ringers having to help every other part of there alliance win a single match. See you on the battlefield ;)

I hope so sir Meode maybe then we will actually fight you SI instead of all there ringers having to help every other part of there alliance win a single match. See you on the battlefield ;)

I see you dont understand the values of our alliance, we fight as an alliance

All for one and one for all.

I see you dont understand the values of our alliance, we fight as an alliance

All for one and one for all.

This will play out when EVE gets the ability to fly MCCs. No need to artifically make it important now

I'm thinking maybe it's a good point.

The whole reason CCP put in clone attrition based on # jumps between districts was to simulate clone loss via EVE transport.

If that is true, it might make sense to add a second attrition mechanic for repeated attacks fron the same clone base. Enemies would definitely exploit and punish clones being shipped from a predictable location.

Proposal: First two attacks no attrition, it goes up after that. It should be a function stongly dependent on the number of location an attack could be launched from, weighted inversely with clone attrition from number of jumps.

I'm thinking maybe it's a good point.

The whole reason CCP put in clone attrition based on # jumps between districts was to simulate clone loss via EVE transport.

If that is true, it might make sense to add a second attrition mechanic for repeated attacks fron the same clone base. Enemies would definitely exploit and punish clones being shipped from a predictable location.

Proposal: First two attacks no attrition, it goes up after that. It should be a function stongly dependent on the number of location an attack could be launched from, weighted inversely with clone attrition from number of jumps.

all the smack talk is just uncalled for until the day (hopefully) that server lag issues are remedied...

so I'd reserve the pissing match for AFTER server-side latency issues are resolved

What Cubs said. Server latency and preferential battle times that can't be changed when you take a district both conspire to give one side or the other a very significant advantage before the battle even starts

What Cubs said. Server latency and preferential battle times that can't be changed when you take a district both conspire to give one side or the other a very significant advantage before the battle even starts

^This... Chronos has been constantly throwing Clones at teamplayers in order to keep us at 2pm Eastern time timers. It seems W/L doesn't matter, the only thing that matters is keeping the fights at 2pm EST when most of our alliance is at work.

The attackers have way to much power in deciding timers.

This is a separate issue from trying to realistically model clone attrition for game design testing purposes.

But it is a good point, and deserving of it's own thread. Timer mechanics we prolly want CCP to take a second pass at.

I am enjoying the fact WTF is continuously attacking Red Star. territory. Word on the street is that they have been attacking Red Star. for the past 3 days and haven't yet secured a single district with around 500 million ISK spent on just on clones.

Personally I think this is a beautiful thing. It shows a corps ability to wage war and another corps ability to defend.

I say yay to PC griefing. We should keep pummeling a corp till it breaks down.

Should we have a cooldown timer so no corp can attack a district say more than 3 or 4 times?

Discuss!

I think after x number of defeats in a given district you should be able to attack an LZ to lock out attacks from that corp for x number of days. If they want to continue to harass you they need to defend the LZ.

This would also be a cool way to completely run someone off of a planet for awhile.

Let them keep attacking. It's expensive as hell to maintain a war of attrition like that so what do I care if another corp wants to waste their money on long term attacks?