|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
169
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 22:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
I appreciate the credit to my thread, but I cant agree this is the fix the Scrambler needs. Damage is fine, as can be seen in my thread, its fairly balanced all around. The range is what needs fixing, as well as the ROF of the TAC AR. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
169
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 23:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Prototype Assault Scram Rifle range : 1-30M
Militia Assault Rifle Range: 1-39M
Nuff said.
Im glad Im not the only one that can see this, 1000 +1s for you. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
169
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 23:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Prototype Assault Scram Rifle range : 1-30M
Militia Assault Rifle Range: 1-39M
Nuff said. All weapons of each type have the same range profile. Comparing the two ends of the scale like it means anything is stupid. And that's the OPTIMAL range for each, not the maximum. Scrambler can actually hit from further away than the regular ARs, even Standard Scrambler vs. Proto AR.
You know just as well as everyone else that optimal is the only thing that really matters. Otherwise you would see people getting high kills with lasers from 10m. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
174
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 04:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:So you're saying the weapon based on short-range Blaster tech was always meant to be more effective at mid-long range encounters than the weapon based around mid-long range Pulse Laser tech?
Seems legit. If you read the description, the Scrambler Rifle and Pistol are actually a hybrid of a plasma and laser weapon.
So crossing a plasma weapon with a laser weapon yields a weapon with a range shorter than the plasma weapon? Im not sure what kind of math you learned in school, but theres something wrong with the average on that. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
178
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 17:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:I think they should swap the optimals of both weapons. Leading to this numbers:
GEK-38 Assault Rifle Max Range: 68m Optimal Range: 1 - 29m
CRD-9 Assault Scrambler Rifle Max Range: 73m Optimal Range: 1 - 40m
As far as I know the Gallante Weapons should be more short ranged high ROF high DPS weapons therefore either lower the SR damage slightly or buff the AR damage slightly to seperate both weapons more in combination of the optimals range change (the same DPS with higher Range for any of the two weapons would result in another imbalance)
I kinda like this idea actually. This would make them fit their racial lore better. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
184
|
Posted - 2013.05.23 15:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
Imp Smash wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:I appreciate the credit to my thread, but I cant agree this is the fix the Scrambler needs. Damage is fine, as can be seen in my thread, its fairly balanced all around. The range is what needs fixing, as well as the ROF of the TAC AR. Signed. This man knows his stuff and is fairly objective plus being eloquent and polite. The only flaw I can find with him or his reasoning is his alliance. You should come join us!
I appreciate the kind words, but you may want to talk to Jenza as to why Im not part of CRONOS. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
185
|
Posted - 2013.05.24 21:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Draco Cerberus wrote:A small zoom on the SR would make a difference but I caution you not to ask for a reduction in heat build up. The heat build up is the only thing that balances this weapon vs the TAC AR. You can charge it up for more damage and this in itself is a very big reason to look at it as a superior weapon to the TAC AR. The superior rate of fire when compared to the TAC AR is also something that I see as a problem on a rifle with NO RECOIL. There is no adjustment needed when firing off a volley of shots at and individual, there is only a need to be concerned with heat buildup, which when managed correctly will never leave you waving your gun in the air to cool down. If a TAC AR user fires 10 rounds at a person, even with maxed out skills, they still need to adjust where their shots are going each time if they wish to hit the person. Not so with a scrambler rifle, you need only to keep an eye on the heat of the weapon while you keep your aim steady.
You have no clue what youre talking about do you? The tac has a ROF of 789.5 and the scram has a ROF of 705.9. Try BSing about something else. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
187
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 03:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zeylon Rho wrote:There's some incoming changes, or so they say. They're going to increase hipfire dispersion and lower clip-size on the TAR, but nothing else. I think it'll probably still be "better" than the Scrambler at that point, but I suppose if it's clear there's still balance issues after that - they may change things again? We just can't expect the changes to happen quickly.
Supposedly they will be extending Scram optimal as well. We will just have to wait and see and hope for the best. |
|
|
|