DUST Search - Now that Dust is oficially not in BETA

All Channels

General Discussions

Now that Dust is oficially not in BETA

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 83	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:31:00 - [1] - Quote Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state?
Delta 749 Maverick Security Consulting 73	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:33:00 - [2] - Quote "It only just launched, all games have problems when they first launch"
Tiel Syysch Imperfects Negative-Feedback 786	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:33:00 - [3] - Quote 10 year plan. Quit being impatient.
GLiMPSE X Elite Gamers Militia 0	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:33:00 - [4] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? SoonGäó Work In ProgressGäó Constant DevelopmentGäó
NeoWraith Acedia Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 430	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:37:00 - [5] - Quote It never made a difference, get over it.
Cosgar The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 893	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:41:00 - [6] - Quote Tiel Syysch wrote: 10 year plan. Quit being impatient. /thread
ADAM-OF-EVE Circle of Huskarl Minmatar Republic 7	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:42:00 - [7] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? dust is still in beta. it may be 5,14 today but the game hasnt been patched yet or released mainstream so stfu, come back with your troll tonight when its been released and a success
XXfootnoteXX DUST University Ivy League 264	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:45:00 - [8] - Quote ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? dust is still in beta. it may be 5,14 today but the game hasnt been patched yet or released mainstream so stfu, come back with your troll tonight when its been released and a success I think your reaching a bit concerning it being a success. Profitable I am sure, but with the game incomplete, I really dont see it as a success.
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:45:00 - [9] - Quote ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? dust is still in beta. it may be 5,14 today but the game hasnt been patched yet or released mainstream so stfu, come back with your troll tonight when its been released and a success Will do, but will you also be here tonight after it gets patched, released, and fails?
XeroTheBigBoss Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 296	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:48:00 - [10] - Quote This beta has been a failure. I don't see the game release being much better. You have a year long beta only to take steps back one week before release.....shameful...

XXfootnoteXX DUST University Ivy League 264	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:48:00 - [11] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? dust is still in beta. it may be 5,14 today but the game hasnt been patched yet or released mainstream so stfu, come back with your troll tonight when its been released and a success Will do, but will you also be here tonight after it gets patched, released, and fails? I think your reaching a bit also, just because it is not complete does not mean it has failed. If it is not profitable, and incomplete, then it fails.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 782	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:52:00 - [12] - Quote Whats your excuse for still being here if you hate playing the game so much?
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:52:00 - [13] - Quote XXfootnoteXX wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? dust is still in beta. it may be 5,14 today but the game hasnt been patched yet or released mainstream so stfu, come back with your troll tonight when its been released and a success Will do, but will you also be here tonight after it gets patched, released, and fails? I think your reaching a bit also, just because it is not complete does not mean it has failed. If it is not profitable, and incomplete, then it fails. As I do agree with you, I really dont see Dust being very profitable ATM. Personally I think they need to rethink there plans here and move the Relaese date to 5,14,2014 and release Dust fineshed and on PS4, but then they would be in strait competition with Destiny and I just dont know if CCP could stand toe to toe with Bungies FPS experience.
Iron Wolf Saber Den of Swords 4096	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:53:00 - [14] - Quote Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:54:00 - [15] - Quote Pokey Dravon wrote: Whats your excuse for still being here if you hate playing the game so much? To troll you mainly, but to also help steere the game in the right deriction ( of my own point of view ) as I do very much wish this game success
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:55:00 - [16] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system
GLiMPSE X Elite Gamers Militia 0	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:55:00 - [17] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: XXfootnoteXX wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? dust is still in beta. it may be 5,14 today but the game hasnt been patched yet or released mainstream so stfu, come back with your troll tonight when its been released and a success Will do, but will you also be here tonight after it gets patched, released, and fails? I think your reaching a bit also, just because it is not complete does not mean it has failed. If it is not profitable, and incomplete, then it fails. As I do agree with you, I really dont see Dust being very profitable ATM. Personally I think they need to rethink there plans here and move the Relaese date to 5,14,2014 and release Dust fineshed and on PS4, but then they would be in strait competition with Destiny and I just dont know if CCP could stand toe to toe with Bungies FPS experience. CCP's success with eve and it's progressive skill gain system will have the same effect in dust. They will gain players over time and have a better retention and return player rate then any of its competitors. There's something about coming back to a game after a break and unlocking all sorts of new shiny things.
XeroTheBigBoss Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 296	Posted - 2013.05.14 06:59:00 - [18] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4!
Gunhilda Zetter DUST University Ivy League 1	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:15:00 - [19] - Quote XeroTheBigBoss wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4! We can argue until the end of time about whether it does it well or not, but by definition Dust has the potential to be more MM than any other FPS out there, PS2 included. I guess we'll get a better idea of that potential later today.
Robert Lanate Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:18:00 - [20] - Quote Quote: Now that Dust is oficially not in BETA That will happen after DT i think.

DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:40:00 - [21] - Quote Gunhilda Zetter wrote: XeroTheBigBoss wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4! We can argue until the end of time about whether it does it well or not, but by definition Dust has the potential to be more MM than any other FPS out there, PS2 included. I guess we'll get a better idea of that potential later today. Well then I guess by Dusts standerds CoD is a MMO And from the number of online users CoD is a really MASSIVE, MMO huh?
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:43:00 - [22] - Quote XeroTheBigBoss wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4! Sorry Xero, Thanks for teaching me what a MMO truly is.
crazy space 1 Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic 1116	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:47:00 - [23] - Quote Tiel Syysch wrote: 10 year plan. Quit being impatient. As an 8 year eve online vet that excuse doesn't work. For some of those years they did ***** job. Saying "oh just wait for a few years" is what people said for years in eve and it ended with a protest. 10 year plan my butt, CCP need to flesh out the suits and fix the main issues asap. Thankfully they are doing so and I have faith if they put thier minds to it, we will have a very good game in a few weeks.
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:48:00 - [24] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? What state ? is no where near half as bad, as it was in the previous build... and even then was only an early beta. Most people calls this progress ; Evolution : - A process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change or development, as in social or economic structure or institutions. - Any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane.
crazy space 1 Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic 1116	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:48:00 - [25] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Gunhilda Zetter wrote: XeroTheBigBoss wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Its an MMO, its always in beta. :P In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4! We can argue until the end of time about whether it does it well or not, but by definition Dust has the potential to be more MM than any other FPS out there, PS2 included. I guess we'll get a better idea of that potential later today. Well then I guess by Dusts standerds CoD is a MMO And from the number of online users CoD is a really MASSIVE, MMO huh? Wait COD has a world of tanks style conquest mode where you can take and hold territory on a single server world? AWESOME oh wait no it doesn't... I just checked, you lied to me ;_;
Calroon DeVil Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 17	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:53:00 - [26] - Quote Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd.
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:53:00 - [27] - Quote GLiMPSE X wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: XXfootnoteXX wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: [quote=ADAM-OF-EVE] Will do, but will you also be here tonight after it gets patched, released, and fails? I think your reaching a bit also, just because it is not complete does not mean it has failed. If it is not profitable, and incomplete, then it fails. As I do agree with you, I really dont see Dust being very profitable ATM. Personally I think they need to rethink there plans here and move the Relaese date to 5,14,2014 and release Dust fineshed and on PS4, but then they would be in strait competition with Destiny and I just dont know if CCP could stand toe to toe with Bungies FPS experience. CCP's success with eve and it's progressive skill gain system will have the same effect in dust. They will gain players over time and have a better retention and return player rate then any of its competitors. There's something about coming back to a game after a break and unlocking all sorts of new shiny things. Idk, I get what ur saying but I think Dust's success will come in 6monthe spurts maybey retaining 1-2% of returning players. As most people will leave Dust as soon as the next AAA FPS comes around but as soon as people start getting bored they say "Hey remember that game, I bet Iv got a ton of SP sitting around" then they will hit Dust strong till the next AAA FPS and will repeat sycle for the life of Dust.
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:57:00 - [28] - Quote Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ?
Cosgar The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 895	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:57:00 - [29] - Quote IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review. Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance. I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game.
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 07:58:00 - [30] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: [quote=DropKickSuicide][quote=Gunhilda Zetter][quote=XeroTheBigBoss][quote=DropKickSuicide] Wait COD has a world of tanks style conquest mode where you can take and hold territory on a single server world? AWESOME What kind of bases can we build, can we produce weapons for our wars? Can we explore our maps we take while there aren't fights going on yet? Because that's coming to dust soon and if it's in COD oh man I'll play that game too! That sounds rad! oh wait no it doesn't... I just checked, you lied to me ;_; Dust has none of this as of this moment and thus by your own standerds cannot be deemed a MMO and is just like COD. SOON means nothing untill it is NOW, If you were dying of thirst and I said I would get you some water SOON, SOON would not be good anough would it? And at this moment in time I am dying of thirst for a good complete game,

DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 84	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 - [31] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? A GameMode should never be the CORE of a game, the GAMEPLAY should be the CORE. What good is PC if the CORE game itself lacks?
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 - [32] - Quote Cosgar wrote: IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review. Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance. I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think....
lowratehitman Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 561	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 - [33] - Quote My prediction is that nothing will change, people will still be QQ ing about everything, and the yellow bumble bee will still be stinging causing eyes to tear up.......I have yet to be wrong on a prediction.... The SR is not a game changer, nor any wepon...
Orenji Jiji Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 63	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:08:00 - [34] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? "It's free."
Talruum Tezztarozza Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS. 116	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:08:00 - [35] - Quote crazy space 1 wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: Gunhilda Zetter wrote: XeroTheBigBoss wrote: DropKickSuicide wrote: In no way is Dust a MMO. Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4! We can argue until the end of time about whether it does it well or not, but by definition Dust has the potential to be more MM than any other FPS out there, PS2 included. I guess we'll get a better idea of that potential later today. Well then I guess by Dusts standerds CoD is a MMO And from the number of online users CoD is a really MASSIVE, MMO huh? Wait COD has a world of tanks style conquest mode where you can take and hold territory on a single server world? AWESOME What kind of bases can we build, can we produce weapons for our wars? Can we explore our maps we take while there aren't fights going on yet? Because that's coming to dust soon and if it's in COD oh man I'll play that game too! That sounds rad! oh wait no it doesn't... I just checked, you lied to me ;_; I believe that is called persistent world. Btw, NO, Dust is by no mean MMO in my book. Regardless of what dev want to call it or the fact that there are many games out there that call themself MMO yet are even less MM than Dust. This is, by no mean, make Dust a bad game. But, NO, I won't call Dust MMO
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:14:00 - [36] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Cosgar wrote: IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review. Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance. I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think.... I use to take Gamespot reviews seriously, "years" ago, but then CNET toke over, and they have became a JOKE. Their credibility is nearly ZERO.
NeoWraith Acedia Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 430	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:15:00 - [37] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Cosgar wrote: IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their *s all over this game in their "non biased" review. Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance. I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think**.... Console players, but most console players didn't get what the beta tag meant anyway, so it's all fine. This really only gives the usual nay-sayers a chance to blow off some steam
Calroon DeVil Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 17	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:20:00 - [38] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business.
DropKickSuicide Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group 86	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:24:00 - [39] - Quote NeoWraith Acedia wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Cosgar wrote: IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their *s all over this game in their "non biased" review. Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance. I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think**.... Console players, but most console players didn't get what the beta tag meant anyway, so it's all fine. This really only gives the usual nay-sayers a chance to blow off some steam Are you not a Console Player? how do you play Dust? why are you on a Console Games Forum?
NeoWraith Acedia Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 430	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:26:00 - [40] - Quote There's a "most" in there you seem to have missed, just like most console players missed the beta tag in the first place

Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:27:00 - [41] - Quote Calroon DeVil wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now...
Delta 749 Maverick Security Consulting 76	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:30:00 - [42] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... Yes but Valve managed to put out a game that wasnt broken at its core and they did it without a year of play testing from thousands of people
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:34:00 - [43] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... Yes but Valve managed to put out a game that wasnt broken at its core and they did it without a year of play testing from thousands of people You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games...
Delta 749 Maverick Security Consulting 76	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:42:00 - [44] - Quote Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:48:00 - [45] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on.
Talruum Tezztarozza Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS. 116	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:52:00 - [46] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on. Actually, HL multiplayer is quite popular. Equivalent to WC3 popularity. It's just that CS is it's DotA equivalent.
Calroon DeVil Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 17	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:55:00 - [47] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... There's a reason why less than 5k people play this game, with numbers declining slowly (although we might get a little push due to "launch day" for a while). You also have to look at the bigger picture of them not running any advertisement (no matter what kind of PR talk lie they feed you). It's because they know the game is currently a mess and will turn players away. Bad word of mouth press will spread 10 times faster than any PR campaign ever could. I get it, we all want the game to success... but man, it's PAINFUL to watch. You'd think after 10 years of EVE and dealing with the community that they learned something of it.
Panther Alpha WarRavens 191	Posted - 2013.05.14 08:57:00 - [48] - Quote Talruum Tezztarozza wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on. Actually, HL multiplayer is quite popular. Equivalent to WC3 popularity. It's just that CS is it's DotA equivalent. No really, I remember trying HL multyplayer, and i went back to FreeSpace 2 immediately. I only tried CS later on, because my friends talk me that was GREAT, and the next big thing.
Delta 749 Maverick Security Consulting 78	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:01:00 - [49] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Delta 749 wrote: Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on. How is that relevant, you said Half Life was only popular due to CS later on, I told you it was popular among many people for other reasons, you ramble about how it already had multiplayer
Aoena Rays Bragian Order Amarr Empire 15	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:01:00 - [50] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... This. Nobody remembers HL1 on release but it was... not good :) And then they patched and improved and it became legendary.

Calroon DeVil Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 18	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:05:00 - [51] - Quote Let's derail this a little. It was on PC afterall.
Panther Alpha WarRavens 192	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:06:00 - [52] - Quote Aoena Rays wrote: Panther Alpha wrote: You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... This. Nobody remembers HL1 on release but it was... not good :) And then they patched and improved and it became legendary. Good to know someone remembers I was starting to worry about been to "old" for playing games...
crazy space 1 Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic 1118	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:09:00 - [53] - Quote Panther Alpha wrote: Calroon DeVil wrote: Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed. No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? See that's the *** * * ****** * ***** problem right there. How was the CORE OF THE GAME not in the BETA A.sd,;kajsgfa;kjscn"Sva'lsdkba;j6dvhb
The Robot Devil BetaMax. CRONOS. 222	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:31:00 - [54] - Quote ] DUST offers players a persistent universe that is driven by the community. Being able to put the game down for a month till the shiny wears off of the next new game or just being able to play a game for free is a big selling point. If I want to play cod for two months and fully prestige then I can and then come back to DUST for a while. Hopefully as more content is added the time between setting down the controller and picking it up will shrink. I am positive that DUST will grow into a game where your CEO sends you a message to tell you that you are needed in a battle and like in EvE people will stop what they are doing to be in on a kill mail. This is a prime example of what I am taking about, no other fps offers this type of potential. http://evenews24.com/2013/01/28/battle-report-video-super-sunday-kicks-off-a-week-earlier-as-the-biggest-eve-fight-in-years-explodes-in-asakai/

ChribbaX Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions 393	Posted - 2013.05.14 09:59:00 - [55] - Quote I didn't want that district anyway. /c

Dudley Do-Right Fast Food To Go 0	Posted - 2013.05.14 19:36:00 - [56] - Quote DropKickSuicide wrote: Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? "You get what you pay for"
tander09 RISE OF THE EMPIRE DARKSTAR ARMY 10	Posted - 2013.05.18 00:12:00 - [57] - Quote Cosgar wrote: IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review. Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance. I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Just pray He doesn't go awall with the GEK and dulvolle. man, this angry review puts this game in the balance, just hope he doesn't screws this up.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.