Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DropKickSuicide
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
84
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 -
[31] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ?
A GameMode should never be the CORE of a game, the GAMEPLAY should be the CORE.
What good is PC if the CORE game itself lacks? |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game.
Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think.... |
lowratehitman
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
561
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 -
[33] - Quote
My prediction is that nothing will change, people will still be QQ ing about everything, and the yellow bumble bee will still be stinging causing eyes to tear up.......I have yet to be wrong on a prediction.... The SR is not a game changer, nor any wepon... |
Orenji Jiji
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
63
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
DropKickSuicide wrote:Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state?
"It's free."
|
Talruum Tezztarozza
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
116
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:DropKickSuicide wrote:Gunhilda Zetter wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:DropKickSuicide wrote: In no way is Dust a MMO.
Its a lobbyFPS-with a RPG skill system
Wow are you Fudgin dumb? Wow Dust isn't a MMO? I suppose next your gonna say Tetris isn't a MMO or Socom2 wasn't a MMO? Wow! Learn what MMO means, thanks! I am going back to my Massive Multiplayer Fighting Game SF4! We can argue until the end of time about whether it does it well or not, but by definition Dust has the potential to be more MM than any other FPS out there, PS2 included. I guess we'll get a better idea of that potential later today. Well then I guess by Dusts standerds CoD is a MMO And from the number of online users CoD is a really MASSIVE, MMO huh? Wait COD has a world of tanks style conquest mode where you can take and hold territory on a single server world? AWESOME What kind of bases can we build, can we produce weapons for our wars? Can we explore our maps we take while there aren't fights going on yet? Because that's coming to dust soon and if it's in COD oh man I'll play that game too! That sounds rad! oh wait no it doesn't... I just checked, you lied to me ;_; I believe that is called persistent world.
Btw, NO, Dust is by no mean MMO in my book. Regardless of what dev want to call it or the fact that there are many games out there that call themself MMO yet are even less MM than Dust. This is, by no mean, make Dust a bad game. But, NO, I won't call Dust MMO
|
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:14:00 -
[36] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think....
I use to take Gamespot reviews seriously, "years" ago, but then CNET toke over, and they have became a JOKE. Their credibility is nearly ZERO. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
430
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think.... Console players, but most console players didn't get what the beta tag meant anyway, so it's all fine. This really only gives the usual nay-sayers a chance to blow off some steam |
Calroon DeVil
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard).
Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. |
DropKickSuicide
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
86
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
NeoWraith Acedia wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think.... Console players, but most console players didn't get what the beta tag meant anyway, so it's all fine. This really only gives the usual nay-sayers a chance to blow off some steam
Are you not a Console Player? how do you play Dust? why are you on a Console Games Forum? |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
430
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:26:00 -
[40] - Quote
There's a "most" in there you seem to have missed, just like most console players missed the beta tag in the first place |
|
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:27:00 -
[41] - Quote
Calroon DeVil wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business.
You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... |
Delta 749
Maverick Security Consulting
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:30:00 -
[42] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now...
Yes but Valve managed to put out a game that wasnt broken at its core and they did it without a year of play testing from thousands of people |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:34:00 -
[43] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... Yes but Valve managed to put out a game that wasnt broken at its core and they did it without a year of play testing from thousands of people
You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... |
Delta 749
Maverick Security Consulting
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:42:00 -
[44] - Quote
Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:48:00 -
[45] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN
Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on. |
Talruum Tezztarozza
Seraphim Auxiliaries CRONOS.
116
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote: Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on.
Actually, HL multiplayer is quite popular. Equivalent to WC3 popularity. It's just that CS is it's DotA equivalent. |
Calroon DeVil
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... There's a reason why less than 5k people play this game, with numbers declining slowly (although we might get a little push due to "launch day" for a while).
You also have to look at the bigger picture of them not running any advertisement (no matter what kind of PR talk lie they feed you). It's because they know the game is currently a mess and will turn players away. Bad word of mouth press will spread 10 times faster than any PR campaign ever could.
I get it, we all want the game to success... but man, it's PAINFUL to watch. You'd think after 10 years of EVE and dealing with the community that they learned something of it. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:57:00 -
[48] - Quote
Talruum Tezztarozza wrote:Panther Alpha wrote: Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on.
Actually, HL multiplayer is quite popular. Equivalent to WC3 popularity. It's just that CS is it's DotA equivalent.
No really, I remember trying HL multyplayer, and i went back to FreeSpace 2 immediately. I only tried CS later on, because my friends talk me that was GREAT, and the next big thing. |
Delta 749
Maverick Security Consulting
78
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:01:00 -
[49] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on.
How is that relevant, you said Half Life was only popular due to CS later on, I told you it was popular among many people for other reasons, you ramble about how it already had multiplayer |
Aoena Rays
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:01:00 -
[50] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... This. Nobody remembers HL1 on release but it was... not good :) And then they patched and improved and it became legendary. |
|
Calroon DeVil
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
18
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
Let's derail this a little. It was on PC afterall. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
192
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:06:00 -
[52] - Quote
Aoena Rays wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... This. Nobody remembers HL1 on release but it was... not good :) And then they patched and improved and it became legendary.
Good to know someone remembers I was starting to worry about been to "old" for playing games... |
crazy space 1
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
1118
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:09:00 -
[53] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ?
See that's the ***** *** * ****** * ***** problem right there. How was the CORE OF THE GAME not in the BETA
A.sd,;kajsgfa;kjscn"Sva'lsdkba;j6dvhb |
The Robot Devil
BetaMax. CRONOS.
222
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:31:00 -
[54] - Quote
] DUST offers players a persistent universe that is driven by the community. Being able to put the game down for a month till the shiny wears off of the next new game or just being able to play a game for free is a big selling point. If I want to play cod for two months and fully prestige then I can and then come back to DUST for a while. Hopefully as more content is added the time between setting down the controller and picking it up will shrink. I am positive that DUST will grow into a game where your CEO sends you a message to tell you that you are needed in a battle and like in EvE people will stop what they are doing to be in on a kill mail.
This is a prime example of what I am taking about, no other fps offers this type of potential. http://evenews24.com/2013/01/28/battle-report-video-super-sunday-kicks-off-a-week-earlier-as-the-biggest-eve-fight-in-years-explodes-in-asakai/
|
|
ChribbaX
Otherworld Enterprises Dust Control Otherworld Empire Productions
393
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
I didn't want that district anyway.
/c |
|
Dudley Do-Right
Fast Food To Go
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 19:36:00 -
[56] - Quote
DropKickSuicide wrote:Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state? "You get what you pay for" |
tander09
RISE OF THE EMPIRE DARKSTAR ARMY
10
|
Posted - 2013.05.18 00:12:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Just pray He doesn't go awall with the GEK and dulvolle. man, this angry review puts this game in the balance, just hope he doesn't screws this up. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |