|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 07:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
DropKickSuicide wrote:Whats is going to be your exscuse for Dust's current state?
What state ? is no where near half as bad, as it was in the previous build... and even then was only an early beta.
Most people calls this progress ; Evolution :
- A process of gradual, peaceful, progressive change or development, as in social or economic structure or institutions.
- Any process of formation or growth; development: the evolution of a language; the evolution of the airplane. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 07:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd.
Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game.
Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think.... |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Panther Alpha wrote:Cosgar wrote:IGN and Gamespot are going to drag their ***s all over this game in their "non biased" review.
Angry Joe might like it despite not being a FPS or MMO guy. He'll at least give it a better rating than Defiance.
I wish G-4 didn't go belly up though. I'm curious what X-Play would have rated the game. Gamespot and IGN ? the " Pay me and i like you " reviewers ? Who cares what they think....
I use to take Gamespot reviews seriously, "years" ago, but then CNET toke over, and they have became a JOKE. Their credibility is nearly ZERO. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Calroon DeVil wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business.
You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:Calroon DeVil wrote:Launch day and that's the patch we get lol. You should feel ashamed and embarrassed.
No wonder you're skipping marketing for now for this turd. Planetary Conquest is the CORE of the game ...what you was expecting exactly ? The CORE of this game, my friend, is ******* BROKEN. Conquest shouldn't even be in this game right now with all the imbalances and sluggishness. They don't even got all the suits in yet, let alone balanced the weapons properly. Conquest will be a mess of imbalances and FOTM specs, followed by CCP balancing patches (nerf it, hard). Always one step behind. Can't blame them though, being Rookies in the FPS business. You know who else was a Rookie making FPS ? Valve, and look at them now... Yes but Valve managed to put out a game that wasnt broken at its core and they did it without a year of play testing from thousands of people
You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Panther I did actually, dont make assumptions all the time it just makes you look bad and undermines your arguments Anyway most people I knew loved it before CS for the atmosphere and gameplay, multiplayer just gave the series lasting appeal Multiplayer based on GAMEPLAY THAT WASNT BROKEN
Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
191
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 08:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Talruum Tezztarozza wrote:Panther Alpha wrote: Actually... HL had multyplayer before CS, it just wasn't very popular... Counter Strike was added later on.
Actually, HL multiplayer is quite popular. Equivalent to WC3 popularity. It's just that CS is it's DotA equivalent.
No really, I remember trying HL multyplayer, and i went back to FreeSpace 2 immediately. I only tried CS later on, because my friends talk me that was GREAT, and the next big thing. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
192
|
Posted - 2013.05.14 09:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Aoena Rays wrote:Panther Alpha wrote:You obviously didn't play HL when 1st was release...in fact, it only became popular when CS was release. Valve tried something NEW, and most people wanted their old Quake and DooM games... This. Nobody remembers HL1 on release but it was... not good :) And then they patched and improved and it became legendary.
Good to know someone remembers I was starting to worry about been to "old" for playing games... |
|
|
|