Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 12:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. |
KalOfTheRathi
Talon Strike Force LTD Orion Empire
421
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 12:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Stacking of corporations?
Not something I have heard of, even down here in the DUST. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 12:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Stacking of corporations?
Not something I have heard of, even down here in the DUST.
its a dust game mode thats in every server you join. you run around in groups of 6 and all shoot doobies at the same time...and you all go the whole game without dying
cant CCP implement some nice servers where sqauds are not allowed? |
steadyhand amarr
NW WARLORDS
501
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 12:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Is this in Fw it's intended and fine if Its instant matches not so good personal I feel squads should be banned from instant matches and use Fw and pc for that. As every other shooter keeps it quick matches free from organised game play. :-P |
Medic 1879
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
248
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 12:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:KalOfTheRathi wrote:Stacking of corporations?
Not something I have heard of, even down here in the DUST. its a dust game mode thats in every server you join. you run around in groups of 6 and all shoot doobies at the same time...and you all go the whole game without dying cant CCP implement some nice servers where sqauds are not allowed?
Would actually be a good idea that for blueberries +1.
Also on the other side playing as a squad of 6 against a squad of 6 from your own corp is quite funny you know each others playstyles and try to counter it but they know yours and counter that had one last night and it was so funny and completley chaotic. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:UK-Shots wrote:KalOfTheRathi wrote:Stacking of corporations?
Not something I have heard of, even down here in the DUST. its a dust game mode thats in every server you join. you run around in groups of 6 and all shoot doobies at the same time...and you all go the whole game without dying cant CCP implement some nice servers where sqauds are not allowed? Would actually be a good idea that for blueberries +1. Also on the other side playing as a squad of 6 against a squad of 6 from your own corp is quite funny you know each others playstyles and try to counter it but they know yours and counter that had one last night and it was so funny and completley chaotic.
its just basic stuff that every FPS has/ ccp seem to be failing with the basics |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Snipers are your best friend.
if players want to run in a group of 6 and not watch cover( which they never do ) they die, of course at best there's usually only 0-2 competant snipers in a game now...so sucks to be you I guess. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:Snipers are your best friend.
if players want to run in a group of 6 and not watch cover( which they never do ) they die, of course at best there's usually only 0-2 competant snipers in a game now...so sucks to be you I guess.
a sniper is not the solution |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:calisk galern wrote:Snipers are your best friend.
if players want to run in a group of 6 and not watch cover( which they never do ) they die, of course at best there's usually only 0-2 competant snipers in a game now...so sucks to be you I guess. a sniper is not the solution
just one of =)
you could also spam grenades at them, proto sleeks would destroy a large squad, sniper forges, and/or good squad play would also work.
tactics do the team well.
of course as with last build if you are playing in instant battles, nobody will have any tactics, and 95% of the people in there are AR users, so really what do you expect to get done >.> |
Halador Osiris
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
299
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. Maybe you should try actually playing with your corp. |
|
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
imagine you being a new player and joining a server getting pubstomped every game?
or even a lone player that his good stands no chance |
Medic 1879
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
248
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:calisk galern wrote:Snipers are your best friend.
if players want to run in a group of 6 and not watch cover( which they never do ) they die, of course at best there's usually only 0-2 competant snipers in a game now...so sucks to be you I guess. a sniper is not the solution
QFT a single sniper may take down 1 or 2 members of a squad but unless they aren't co-ordinating which negates the argument anyway you can bet atleast one is calling out the snipers location calling for a counter snipe. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
Halador Osiris wrote:UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. Maybe you should try actually playing with your corp.
i did yesterday.. every oms game finished 75-0 |
Medic 1879
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
249
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
To people saying the counter to a squad is to squad your self you are right, however think of the poor blueberries who start the game and dont have a corp to squad with and can only join with randoms their first few games are slaughter fests that most people are not going to enjoy. So a mode like mercanary for COD (onlything I like about that game.) would really help out the new guys. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Medic 1879 wrote:UK-Shots wrote:calisk galern wrote:Snipers are your best friend.
if players want to run in a group of 6 and not watch cover( which they never do ) they die, of course at best there's usually only 0-2 competant snipers in a game now...so sucks to be you I guess. a sniper is not the solution QFT a single sniper may take down 1 or 2 members of a squad but unless they aren't co-ordinating which negates the argument anyway you can bet atleast one is calling out the snipers location calling for a counter snipe.
yep no snpier can take down the whole squad we just pick one or two off which should level the field a bit, maybe remove that logi repping the heavy or get rid of that annoying scout shotty, if my team can't do the rest, there's nothing more I can do =/
you have no idea how many times I'll see two guys rush a lonely blue dot, i'll kill one and the blue dot will get the other....well it's not nearly as often as I'll see that one red dot still troll roll the poor blue dot. I just sigh and move on =/ |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
pretty much a game breaker. i bet this game has lost thousands of players.. through lack of getting a fair game |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:pretty much a game breaker. i bet this game has lost thousands of players.. through lack of getting a fair game
well match making is an old issue, and been discussed alot, didn't think that was your complaint. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:UK-Shots wrote:pretty much a game breaker. i bet this game has lost thousands of players.. through lack of getting a fair game well match making is an old issue, and been discussed alot, didn't think that was your complaint.
nothin as been done about it then? |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:52:00 -
[19] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:calisk galern wrote:UK-Shots wrote:pretty much a game breaker. i bet this game has lost thousands of players.. through lack of getting a fair game well match making is an old issue, and been discussed alot, didn't think that was your complaint. nothin as been done about it then?
yep, I assume they are getting around to it.
the main things I'm behind are meta restrictions on high sec matches.
sp limitations so players with 4mil sp face otehr players with 4mil sp.
I suggested a newbie mode where players get diminishing rewards as their SP goes up. encouraging them to move into other matches with higher end players as they get more used to the game.
as with anything, ccp makes you wait for stuff. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 13:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
just needs sqaudless servers thats all |
|
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:just needs sqaudless servers thats all
this isn't COD, it's a squad focused game. you are supposed to fight in squads, and something like a squadless game mode would do nothing but teach new players the wrong way to play the game |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
37
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:12:00 -
[22] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:UK-Shots wrote:just needs sqaudless servers thats all this isn't COD, it's a squad focused game. you are supposed to fight in squads, and something like a squadless game mode would do nothing but teach new players the wrong way to play the game
yer your right it isnt a well made game like cod..probably why the dust player count is 1800 right now
well thats rapped up..6 people can go around and ruin the blueberries games.. . thats just because its a sqaud based game aint it |
Kleanur Guy
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
208
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
calisk galern wrote:UK-Shots wrote:just needs sqaudless servers thats all this isn't COD, it's a squad focused game. you are supposed to fight in squads, and something like a squadless game mode would do nothing but teach new players the wrong way to play the game
And playing a game where vsing 10million SP squads every game is good for newberries? We do want casuals in this game, not just hardcore FW peeps everywhere. ATM its rediculously boring to play solo in this game (because I do it) and 4 man squads were bad enough, you're telling me I have to vs squads of 6 good players? Okay I'll go militia snipe in the redline because thats the solution according to Calisk |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
78
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:22:00 -
[24] - Quote
good matchmaking would help. 6 man squad is no issue if everyone was rocking same gear. Just got off game with my team being all noobs and all wanting to go solo. Needless to say we got slaughtered. I kept trying to get our team moral up, by trying to keep the push foward. even switching to proto 2 times. I went 0-11. first time in the year and change I've been playing dust.
I need a hug. ....ladies? |
Fargen Icehole
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
85
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:23:00 -
[25] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game.
You never played MAG did you. It was pretty common to see groups of 8 or more (once clan deploy was implemented)
Or even BF3. I saw a group of 4 clan members in every other match I played. Would have been more, except grouping of 4 is all that BF3 allowed. (for PS3)
Same games are more "squad-friendly" ... meaning they GENERALLY require more teamwork to be effective. This means you're more likely to see ppl grouping up. The reason you don't see it as much in COD, is because it's easier to just run and gun by yourself.
Edit: BTW, it's just luck of the draw. I'm pretty inpatient, so if I have to wait more than 2min for a squad, I run solo for bit. When I run solo, there are days where I may only see a squaded group a couple times. Then other days, it seems like almost EVERY match, I'm going against full squads. Just depends on your luck too. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
111
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kleanur Guy wrote:calisk galern wrote:UK-Shots wrote:just needs sqaudless servers thats all this isn't COD, it's a squad focused game. you are supposed to fight in squads, and something like a squadless game mode would do nothing but teach new players the wrong way to play the game And playing a game where vsing 10million SP squads every game is good for newberries? We do want casuals in this game, not just hardcore FW peeps everywhere. ATM its rediculously boring to play solo in this game (because I do it) and 4 man squads were bad enough, you're telling me I have to vs squads of 6 good players? Okay I'll go militia snipe in the redline because thats the solution according to Calisk
I said a good sniper is your friend and is an answer to reckless groups of corps moving as a blob, militia snipers are definitely not the answer to anything, militia gear in general is not the answer to anything it is garbage an should only be used while you work up to real gear, of course that's when I thought his complaint was that he couldn't solo 6 man squads, it later turned into a discussion on match making.
I've since then already posted my favorite suggestions for the match making issue. |
UK-Shots
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
37
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:27:00 -
[27] - Quote
Fargen Icehole wrote:UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. You never played MAG did you. It was pretty common to see groups of 8 or more (once clan deploy was implemented) Or even BF3. I saw a group of 4 clan members in every other match I played. Would have been more, except grouping of 4 is all that BF3 allowed. (for PS3) Same games are more "squad-friendly" ... meaning they GENERALLY require more teamwork to be effective. This means you're more likely to see ppl grouping up. The reason you don't see it as much in COD, is because it's easier to just run and gun by yourself.
played mag../probably the worst game ive ever brought. bf3 was no where near as bad as dust.. |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
78
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:38:00 -
[28] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:Fargen Icehole wrote:UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. You never played MAG did you. It was pretty common to see groups of 8 or more (once clan deploy was implemented) Or even BF3. I saw a group of 4 clan members in every other match I played. Would have been more, except grouping of 4 is all that BF3 allowed. (for PS3) Same games are more "squad-friendly" ... meaning they GENERALLY require more teamwork to be effective. This means you're more likely to see ppl grouping up. The reason you don't see it as much in COD, is because it's easier to just run and gun by yourself. played mag../probably the worst game ive ever brought. bf3 was no where near as bad as dust..//stacked servers are frequent on dust ..and you pretty much have to deal with 5 or 6 people shooring you at the same time
Hey don't be hasty. You probably would hate socom too. Thing is you can't solo here. I've played it all, And when you do try and solo (even with good intentions as in trying to carry team) you will go 0-11. YOU DON"T CARRY TEAMS IN TEAM FPS. SQUADS DO. in BF you can take out a 4 person squad solo. Not here. Not in mag. even less in socom. |
Kleanur Guy
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
209
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:39:00 -
[29] - Quote
UK-Shots wrote:Fargen Icehole wrote:UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. You never played MAG did you. It was pretty common to see groups of 8 or more (once clan deploy was implemented) Or even BF3. I saw a group of 4 clan members in every other match I played. Would have been more, except grouping of 4 is all that BF3 allowed. (for PS3) Same games are more "squad-friendly" ... meaning they GENERALLY require more teamwork to be effective. This means you're more likely to see ppl grouping up. The reason you don't see it as much in COD, is because it's easier to just run and gun by yourself. played mag../probably the worst game ive ever brought. bf3 was no where near as bad as dust..//stacked servers are frequent on dust ..and you pretty much have to deal with 5 or 6 people shooring you at the same time
You didn't even need a squad of 4 to win a BF3 pub match, 1 good player would do it. |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
78
|
Posted - 2013.05.09 14:40:00 -
[30] - Quote
Kleanur Guy wrote:UK-Shots wrote:Fargen Icehole wrote:UK-Shots wrote:its just ridiculous. never seen anythin like it on any game. You never played MAG did you. It was pretty common to see groups of 8 or more (once clan deploy was implemented) Or even BF3. I saw a group of 4 clan members in every other match I played. Would have been more, except grouping of 4 is all that BF3 allowed. (for PS3) Same games are more "squad-friendly" ... meaning they GENERALLY require more teamwork to be effective. This means you're more likely to see ppl grouping up. The reason you don't see it as much in COD, is because it's easier to just run and gun by yourself. played mag../probably the worst game ive ever brought. bf3 was no where near as bad as dust..//stacked servers are frequent on dust ..and you pretty much have to deal with 5 or 6 people shooring you at the same time You didn't even need a squad of 4 to win a BF3 pub match, 1 good player would do it.
+1 to you, cause I just said the same too. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |