DUST Search - CCP, You did alot right!

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

CCP, You did alot right!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The Black Jackal The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 443	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:32:00 - [1] - Quote I've seen very little but QQing on the changes that happened this build. Ranges nerfed, damage nerfed. I'm getting pwned now. The list of negative 'I want things they way "I" liked them masquerading as community ideas is laughable. CCP I implore you not to listen to most of these people. Your graphics update is great, your new structures look pretty damn wicked inside and out. The Base Frame with Specialised Frames on top could do with some tweaking, but overall, the idea is good. I find, once I got used to the different control scheme, my controller game and KB / M Game actually improved over last build. Lag is better. I'm playing on Dial-up Speed due to net being shaped, and from Australia on US and EU servers, and STILL going Positive KDR in most matches. There ARE some rough edges, but please, I want you to know you have done ALOT right this build. And don't cave in to the QQing Heavies, because there are Heavies out there who've already adapted and kicking arse, rather than crying and rerolling a different class. I seriously cannot wait until May 14th for Planetary Conquest, and even Net capped, I know I can still contribute. Keep up the great work, sand off the few rough edges, and I hope to see even more content coming in the future.
Smoky The Bear Intergalactic Cannibus Cartel 23	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:33:00 - [2] - Quote Ya like make the AR the only weapon that works.. lol..
NeoWraith Acedia Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire 196	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:41:00 - [3] - Quote The fact that a few people are able to do well despite the handicaps placed on the heavy does not mean that the class is just fine. Seriously, if you yourself have never played a heavy, this build or in another, then you have no place giving feedback on their current state.
Smoky The Bear Intergalactic Cannibus Cartel 23	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:43:00 - [4] - Quote NeoWraith Acedia wrote: The fact that a few people are able to do well despite the handicaps placed on the heavy does not mean that the class is just fine. Seriously if yourself have never played a heavy, this build or in another, then you have no place giving feedback on their current state. Exactly .. IF you dont rock a HEAVY DONT BOTHER SPEAKING ..just GTFO.. NOW
The Black Jackal The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 443	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:45:00 - [5] - Quote Smoky The Bear wrote: NeoWraith Acedia wrote: The fact that a few people are able to do well despite the handicaps placed on the heavy does not mean that the class is just fine. Seriously if yourself have never played a heavy, this build or in another, then you have no place giving feedback on their current state. Exactly .. IF you dont rock a HEAVY DONT BOTHER SPEAKING ..just GTFO.. NOW And you would know I never played a Heavy... how?
Smoky The Bear Intergalactic Cannibus Cartel 23	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:48:00 - [6] - Quote by ur stupid comment..
The Black Jackal The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 443	Posted - 2013.05.07 16:56:00 - [7] - Quote Smoky The Bear wrote: by my stupid comment.. fixed it for you. Fact is I have played heavies. And while I haven't specced into them this time around due to excessive SP requirements to get into and outfit a decent suit for Planetary Conquest, the people I have played heavies beside have said to me that though they keenly feel more limitations than they did before... they still do well with them. And as stated before, they are Australian, playing from Australia, on US and EU Servers, where we suffered a minimum 200 m/s input lag in previous builds. Sure, they aren't posting the 30 / 1 or 35 / 0 Scorecards they used to, but they still do very well in most matches. And, there are a few US guys I know who have no real qualms about them either.
The Black Jackal The Southern Legion RISE of LEGION 443	Posted - 2013.05.08 02:03:00 - [8] - Quote Bumping, because amidst the complaints about justified bugs, weapon nerfs and the other 'rough edges, CCP did still do a lot right in this build, and while there is more to do, they shouldn't lose sight of the fact that some things they did are great.
Ulysses Knapse Nuevo Atlas Corporation 357	Posted - 2013.05.08 02:08:00 - [9] - Quote NeoWraith Acedia wrote: The fact that a few people are able to do well despite the handicaps placed on the heavy does not mean that the class is just fine. Seriously, if you yourself have never played a heavy, this build or in another, then you have no place giving feedback on their current state. I played Heavy back in Chromosome, and with the recent nerf to the HMG I am certainly not doing it again.
Lance 2ballzStrong SyNergy Gaming EoN. 1462	Posted - 2013.05.08 02:16:00 - [10] - Quote The Black Jackal wrote: Smoky The Bear wrote: NeoWraith Acedia wrote: The fact that a few people are able to do well despite the handicaps placed on the heavy does not mean that the class is just fine. Seriously if yourself have never played a heavy, this build or in another, then you have no place giving feedback on their current state. Exactly .. IF you dont rock a HEAVY DONT BOTHER SPEAKING ..just GTFO.. NOW And you would know I never played a Heavy... how? Hey I went 17-2 yesterday against decent players. Does that mean the HMG's good? **** no! It means I got lucky and stole allot of kills.

Cosgar The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY 523	Posted - 2013.05.08 02:33:00 - [11] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: The Black Jackal wrote: Smoky The Bear wrote: NeoWraith Acedia wrote: The fact that a few people are able to do well despite the handicaps placed on the heavy does not mean that the class is just fine. Seriously if yourself have never played a heavy, this build or in another, then you have no place giving feedback on their current state. Exactly .. IF you dont rock a HEAVY DONT BOTHER SPEAKING ..just GTFO.. NOW And you would know I never played a Heavy... how? Hey I went 17-2 yesterday against decent players. Does that mean the HMG's good? **** no! It means I got lucky and stole allot of kills. We shouldn't be arguing amongst ourselves when we have a more common enemy.... those damn AR ASSaults! Everything in this game took a hit, and the only hit they took affected all weapons. Maybe if we QQ as much as they do when they die to something that's not like them, maybe CCP will do something about them.
DESTROYER416 DIOS EX. 5	Posted - 2013.05.08 02:41:00 - [12] - Quote i went 30/2 with my hmg against better then decent people. the nerf to the hmg was unnecessary but its manageable. A good logi or two decent logis and a heavy can take on groups of people. You just have to pick you fights. and the graphics are sick a big difference from pre uprising
Maken Tosch Planetary Response Organization 2212	Posted - 2013.05.08 04:06:00 - [13] - Quote I'm surprised there is very little qq about the nova knives.
DESTROYER416 DIOS EX. 5	Posted - 2013.05.08 04:22:00 - [14] - Quote Maken Tosch wrote: I'm surprised there is very little qq about the nova knives. cuz it takes balls to run into a pack of people with them


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.