Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
395
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 06:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is going to be a multi-part suggestion/feedback based on balancing Ambush. There will be three topics in total that will almost completely balance ambush to pure perfection.
Part 1 - https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=751260&
Ambush tanks
Tanks in ambush, a love-hate relationship for sure. Love them when they are on our team, hate them when they are on the other. In skirmish tanks are expected and part of the intended gameplay, but for ambush they are an abomination of imbalance.
Granted tankers who have little experience and/or use weak tanks are somewhat "easy" to take out given the right AV players and team/map situation. But tankers who know what they are doing, even remotely, mixed with a team that isn't super terri-bad is a giant thorn in the side of ambush.
I run proto swarms at swarm proficiently level 3 with three complex damage mods, and even if I can manage do some good damage, all the tanker has to do is back up a little and they are now completely out of my view. Which requires me to run all the way around the map to get another shot. And again, even if I get that shot, they simply move a tiny bit again and rinse and repeat. Of course this is all taking into consideration the tank wasn't able to kill me, or the none of the enemy players were able to either (as an AV assault, I am a glass cannon almost 100% vulnerable to infantry players).
Argument 1: "Tanks are so expensive and strong, why do you think you should be able to single handily take them on with a ~100k suit? " Well three reasons, first being that even if my team has several AV players of various form (AV nades, swarms, forge) these decent tankers use the same technique, run and hide behind their team and become inaccessible to AV. Second being, unless this game is p2w, no amount of ISK, AUR or SP should guarantee your survival. If I am highly speced into AV, I should be able to do massive damage, or take out the tank completely. Third, I am talking about solo playing, the chances that a team that I randomly land on is going to be speced into AV is slim to none. Most players will just get slaughtered by the tank repeatedly, or try to bring in some militia garbage that won't even scratch the surface of the tank.
Tanks in ambush are wrong on so many levels, and they absolutely destroy it. Mix a decent tanker with squads as well, this is about the worst situation a solo player, like myself, can run into in ambush. OB's come quickly and easily, then it's a matter of spawn farming making it all but impossible for the enemy team to do anything about the tank.
Then of course there is the situation in which the enemy team calls in multiple tanks (who are often times part of the same squad or group of players).
Solution? You guessed it, along with part 1 of my threads, adding into having an ambush mode with no squads, it should also include no vehicles as well (LAV's arent necessarily a huge problem, but they still don't belong in ambush). Players play ambush to fight infantry, not to deal with tanks or getting run over by LAV's.
I'll end this topic with this video that lowratehitman created today, he was riding shotgun in a tank as a squad leader... this video perfectly demonstrates the ridiculousness of tanks and squads in ambush. It about sums up most of my experiences vs tanks in ambush.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVhtqCMwn8o |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
489
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 06:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man! |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
325
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
tanks are getting nerfed, hard. again because somehow skilling into a HAV is being to good and to much to beat non-skill MLT swarms and HMG users.. |
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Stop whining because you can't AV properly. I've two shotted HAV's with both PROTO swarms and nades. I've also have been 4 shotted in a very quick succession. How about you try and get closer? Oh wait, the other team is doing it's job and covering it. I really don't see a problem with it, and the people who's tried using a HAV doesn't either; they just pull out AV and kill them.
Peace, Godin |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
395
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man!
Not asking for tanks to be nerfed (although they could use a speed nerf TBH), I am asking that the players have a choice to play in ambush without tanks. What's wrong with that?
|
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
HA! of course, this guy has never used a HAV before. I doubt he hasn't been inside one for more than a minute, or talked to the pilots who use them. NO.
Peace, Godin |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
490
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote:More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man! Not asking for tanks to be nerfed (although they could use a speed nerf TBH), I am asking that the players have a choice to play in ambush without tanks. What's wrong with that? Because it's taking away from the sandbox experience that this game offers. If you want to learn how to pop vehicles, you're going to have to fight them, not avoid them. If you get your way and there's infantry only modes, how many people do you think are going to ignore AV again? Then when they do run into a vehicle, they'll deem it as OP because they got to ignore its effective counter, AV. |
Zero Harpuia
WarRavens Orion Empire
430
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:HA! of course, this guy has never used a HAV before. I doubt he hasn't been inside one for more than a minute, or talked to the pilots who use them. NO. Peace, Godin
You do realize that the DJINN are some of the more notorious tankers, right? Not sure which are the pilots myself, but I'm sure he has decent experience on both sides of the issue. |
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:HA! of course, this guy has never used a HAV before. I doubt he hasn't been inside one for more than a minute, or talked to the pilots who use them. NO. Peace, Godin You do realize that the DJINN are some of the more notorious tankers, right? Not sure which are the pilots myself, but I'm sure he has decent experience on both sides of the issue.
From my year and 4 months of play, I've yet to see a DJUNN talk good nor even drive a HAV. So, I doubt it.
Peace, Godin |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
490
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP has made it so easy to pop tanks that you don't even have to spec into a light weapon anymore to do it. Just carry some OP proto AV 'nades, chuck em' at anything with wheels or treads and go about your overrated infantry battles. |
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
lol, I wanted to get in a few last minuets with this build before servers went down, and this what I saw coming into my very first ambush of the night.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Leukotic/tank_lolz1_zps3f560773.png
Yup, 5 tankers, and in the bowl map to boot (although the one being brought in with the bolas blew up, because the drunkard pilot crashed while deploying it ) |
Vickers S Grunt
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
72
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Duh tanks are UP have u not read the forum ??
|
Zero Harpuia
WarRavens Orion Empire
431
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:44:00 -
[13] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:lol, I wanted to get in a few last minuets with this build before servers went down, and this what I saw coming into my very first ambush of the night. http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Leukotic/tank_lolz1_zps3f560773.pngYup, 5 tankers, and in the bowl map to boot (although the one being brought in with the bolas blew up, because the drunkard pilot crashed while deploying it )
kee-ripes. It's like every corp match distilled into a screenshot. So... beautiful.
Persoanlly, I just think vehicles should be removed from Ambush because there is no reliable manner if class change beyond suicide in most Ambush matches, so if a tank is called in you have to suffer a death, a random spawn, and then finding and dealing with the vehicle while wearing a 'free 50 WP' sign. |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
491
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote:More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man! Not asking for tanks to be nerfed ( although they could use a speed nerf TBH), I am asking that the players have a choice to play in ambush without tanks. What's wrong with that? Quoted to put contradiction on display.
This game needs more vehicles so that other players can see this isn't just another run and gun twitch shooter. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
325
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 07:46:00 -
[15] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:CCP has made it so easy to pop tanks that you don't even have to spec into a light weapon anymore to do it. Just carry some OP proto AV 'nades, chuck em' at anything with wheels or treads and go about your overrated infantry battles. AV NADES the only av equipment infantry ever need to carry, why, they have the high damage per hit and damage per second on vehicles and they seek out vehicles so you can throw them away from the vehicle and the still hit so no need to spec into any AV weapon because locus and AV are in the same skill something you'll need to spec into anyways. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 08:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote:More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man! Not asking for tanks to be nerfed (although they could use a speed nerf TBH), I am asking that the players have a choice to play in ambush without tanks. What's wrong with that? Because it's taking away from the sandbox experience that this game offers. If you want to learn how to pop vehicles, you're going to have to fight them, not avoid them. If you get your way and there's infantry only modes, how many people do you think are going to ignore AV again? Then when they do run into a vehicle, they'll deem it as OP because they got to ignore its effective counter, AV.
Well if nobody wants to go up against tanks, then what does that say about their balance? If tanks were balanced and easily manageable with AV, then it wouldn't be an issue playing against them, right?
Its not as if skirmish won't have tanks, or OMS. Plenty of people like playing those modes, and especially since FW/PC will be based on skirmish, players won't be able to avoid them all the time, only when they don't feel like dealing with them and want some good ol' infantry PvP.
Zero Harpuia wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:lol, I wanted to get in a few last minuets with this build before servers went down, and this what I saw coming into my very first ambush of the night. http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Leukotic/tank_lolz1_zps3f560773.pngYup, 5 tankers, and in the bowl map to boot (although the one being brought in with the bolas blew up, because the drunkard pilot crashed while deploying it ) kee-ripes. It's like every corp match distilled into a screenshot. So... beautiful. Persoanlly, I just think vehicles should be removed from Ambush because there is no reliable manner if class change beyond suicide in most Ambush matches, so if a tank is called in you have to suffer a death, a random spawn, and then finding and dealing with the vehicle while wearing a 'free 50 WP' sign.
+1, pure win post right there!
I totally spaced on that as an argument point for a no tank ambush mode, as non-OMS ambush doesn't any supply depots, which is a huge deal when tanks come in when everybody is already situated as infantry vs infantry. The tank pretty much gets a whole bunch of freebies before people start getting frustrated and bringing in some attempt of AV (and managing to survive with that AV loadout to do some sort of damage to the tank).
|
Zero Harpuia
WarRavens Orion Empire
432
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 08:13:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote:More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man! Not asking for tanks to be nerfed ( although they could use a speed nerf TBH), I am asking that the players have a choice to play in ambush without tanks. What's wrong with that? Quoted to put contradiction on display. This game needs more vehicles so that other players can see this isn't just another run and gun twitch shooter.
It isn't a contradiction, he simply points out that, while he's thinking about it since you forded the subject, they could use a nerf. Not that he asked for one. Simple reading comprehension thing there, had to say something.
Now, constructive... just curious on how more vehicles makes something less about run'n'gun twitch shooting? The vehicles allow you to get from shooting area A to B faster, or they shoot people. There needs to be a decent limiter on vehicles, not so much their individual power or a limited slot system, but something to stem the tide. In other shooters with vehicles, you either have a limited number spawning about the map, like in a Halo title, or you have cooldown timers and inmatch resource limiters, such as Planetside 2. Also, while mentioning PS2, they tend to have far bigger maps to facilitate the need for faster transport, and many areas where the vehicles can't get to, limiting their effectiveness to outer defensive clearing and suppression. Finally, the issue of ammo, as DUST vehicles have an infinite supply. These tanks can destroy all the supply points on a map to prevent swaps to and from AV and stroll merrily about for the rest of the ambush. With nothing limiting the HAV but the wallet of the player (and lets be honest, ISK is no object to any corp that gives a damn), ergo the rush to nerf it. Just trimming it from Ambush, or at least making a new vehicle-free Ambush like there is a Random-crap-falling-from-the-sky free version, makes sense. What idiot tries to ambush someone via a vehicle visible from tactical satellite radar? |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
493
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 08:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote:More tank butthurt. HAV a heart man! Not asking for tanks to be nerfed (although they could use a speed nerf TBH), I am asking that the players have a choice to play in ambush without tanks. What's wrong with that? Because it's taking away from the sandbox experience that this game offers. If you want to learn how to pop vehicles, you're going to have to fight them, not avoid them. If you get your way and there's infantry only modes, how many people do you think are going to ignore AV again? Then when they do run into a vehicle, they'll deem it as OP because they got to ignore its effective counter, AV. Well if nobody wants to go up against tanks, then what does that say about their balance? If tanks were balanced and easily manageable with AV, then it wouldn't be an issue playing against them, right? Its not as if skirmish won't have tanks, or OMS. Plenty of people like playing those modes, and especially since FW/PC will be based on skirmish, players won't be able to avoid them all the time, only when they don't feel like dealing with them and want some good ol' infantry PvP. But players will still have the opportunity to avoid them and they'll never learn to take out HAV. Would you want one of those scrubs in your corp if they didn't spec into some kind of AV or they don't know how to blow one up? |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 08:56:00 -
[19] - Quote
Cosgar wrote: But players will still have the opportunity to avoid them and they'll never learn to take out HAV. Would you want one of those scrubs in your corp if they didn't spec into some kind of AV or they don't know how to blow one up?
But really, why would it matter? If somebody want's to forfeit any experience taking them out, then why should they be stopped? Why shouldn't a player speced into infantry vs infantry be able to enjoy that aspect? Ambush isn't designed for vehicles, especially tanks. People generally play ambush to enjoy infantry vs infantry. People generally play skirmish to enjoy teamwork, squads and vehicle use (which is what that mode was designed for).
As an assault player that had to take on a role of AV (since heavies weren't fulfilling that role... which they were designed for BTW) I resent the fact that I have to multitask and deal with vehicles as well.
Players in this game are always complaining about the all-in-one aspect, and that we should be specific to our role. Well, my role as an assault player it to take out other infantry players, not vehicles. And the small map ambush design is for infantry vs infantry. Tanks are an unnatural element in that mode that severely offset it.
Also a decent recruiter will recruit as needed, and if the player has no experience taking out tanks, then either they are denied or placed in a position that doesn't require them to be AV. Unless you are implying that every class role in the game should be required to be specd into AV? What about snipers?
|
KalOfTheRathi
Talon Strike Force LTD Orion Empire
403
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 08:57:00 -
[20] - Quote
So, is bad timing your specialty?
Different game in a few hours. Tanks are toast. |
|
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
495
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:So, is bad timing your specialty?
Different game in a few hours. Tanks are toast. I don't think he cares.
Not sure if trolling, or just bored |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:20:00 -
[22] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:So, is bad timing your specialty?
Different game in a few hours. Tanks are toast.
Until we play Uprising, we won't know for sure.
But I seriously doubt tankers are just going to roll over and die because they temporarily lost their proto variants. They also now have stronger/better missile turrets (and possibly one or two other buffs that I read about in patch notes).
And as we have all likely experienced from Codex, missile turrets can be beast. Tankers now (well in Chromosome) use blasters because missile turrets were nerfed so much, but now that they are closer to what they were before, they are likely to make a strong comeback. |
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
53
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:23:00 -
[23] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Cosgar wrote: But players will still have the opportunity to avoid them and they'll never learn to take out HAV. Would you want one of those scrubs in your corp if they didn't spec into some kind of AV or they don't know how to blow one up?
But really, why would it matter? If somebody want's to forfeit any experience taking them out, then why should they be stopped? Why shouldn't a player speced into infantry vs infantry be able to enjoy that aspect? Ambush isn't designed for vehicles, especially tanks. People generally play ambush to enjoy infantry vs infantry. People generally play skirmish to enjoy teamwork, squads and vehicle use (which is what that mode was designed for). As an assault player that had to take on a role of AV (since heavies weren't fulfilling that role... which they were designed for BTW) I resent the fact that I have to multitask and deal with vehicles as well. Players in this game are always complaining about the all-in-one aspect, and that we should be specific to our role. Well, my role as an assault player it to take out other infantry players, not vehicles. And the small map ambush design is for infantry vs infantry. Tanks are an unnatural element in that mode that severely offset it. Also a decent recruiter will recruit as needed, and if the player has no experience taking out tanks, then either they are denied or placed in a position that doesn't require them to be AV. Unless you are implying that every class role in the game should be required to be specd into AV? What about snipers?
1: There is no Sniper Dropsuit frame; they're Scout suits. two different things.
2: So I skilled solely, for the most part, to the best of my ability, to have the best HAV's I can possibly make, even though they've been nerfed to ****, yet, I'm not allowed to use the only thing I skilled for, or play on matches where AV can hide eaiser? Or, use dropsuits that I haven't been skilled for? Actually, I will not. You sir, made me think less highly of the DJINN kind.
Peace, Godin |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
442
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
I took my HAV into ambush yday for the 1st time in weeks
I smashed the entire enemy team and it felt really good
I may continue to do this in Uprising as payback
Enjoy |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:1: There is no Sniper Dropsuit frame; they're Scout suits. two different things. 2: So I skilled solely, for the most part, to the best of my ability, to have the best HAV's I can possibly make, even though they've been nerfed to ****, yet, I'm not allowed to use the only thing I skilled for, or play on matches where AV can hide eaiser? Or, use dropsuits that I haven't been skilled for? Actually, I will not. You sir, made me think less highly of the DJINN kind. Peace, Godin
So what about scouts that like to run around with AR's? Should they be forced to take on tanks too? Shotgunners?
As for your second paragraph, no idea what you are trying to say. But nobody is stopping you from playing all the other modes which allow tanks. Unless you are implying that tankers are so selfish that they don't want any gamemode that allows players who aren't AV speced (or want to deal with AV) to have fun without dealing with enemy tanks?
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:48:00 -
[26] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:I took my HAV into ambush yday for the 1st time in weeks
I smashed the entire enemy team and it felt really good
I may continue to do this in Uprising as payback
Enjoy
Straight from the horses mouth |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1013
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:51:00 -
[27] - Quote
I took my AR into ambush yday for the 100th time
I smashed the entire team and it felt really good
I may continue to do this in Uprising as 30/0 is fun
Enjoy |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 09:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:I took my AR into ambush yday for the 100th time
I smashed the entire team and it felt really good
I may continue to do this in Uprising as 30/0 is fun
Enjoy
So why bother with a tank?
Unless you like going 40-0 and 20x the WP's |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1013
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 10:00:00 -
[29] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:I took my AR into ambush yday for the 100th time
I smashed the entire team and it felt really good
I may continue to do this in Uprising as 30/0 is fun
Enjoy So why bother with a tank? Unless you like going 40-0 and 20x the WP's
Because tanking is my passion.
20x the WPs? xD are you dumb? You don't get 20x the WP, you can get double the WP if you decide to kill every bolas in the game (buff bolas plz), never seen anyone hit over the 6k mark yet, definitely seen Infantry with 3k WP.
But really, I like spending 2.3 mil and risking it every game, it's a risk that gives me a reason to play. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
396
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 10:36:00 -
[30] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:
Because tanking is my passion.
20x the WPs? xD are you dumb? You don't get 20x the WP, you can get double the WP if you decide to kill every bolas in the game (buff bolas plz), never seen anyone hit over the 6k mark yet, definitely seen Infantry with 3k WP.
But really, I like spending 2.3 mil and risking it every game, it's a risk that gives me a reason to play.
Oh I'm sorry, did I exaggerate a bit?
My passion is infantry vs infantry, so why can't I enjoy that too without having a tank ruin an ambush match for me? Using my assault AV fit reaps little rewards, mostly loss. Unless I can manage to take out several tanks/vehicles, usually all I do is tickle tanks all match long and end up getting killed by infantry slayers, then spawning and getting killed again because my team is getting steamrolled.. rinse and repeat. I get a garbage payout, garbage SP, and usually take a hit on my KDR (since I can't kill squat with swarms and crappy sidearm vs dedicated infantry vs infantry players).
Apparently tankers get what they want, so why can't we infantry vs infantry players get a small break? Why would you be against an ambush mode without tanks? |
|
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
54
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 10:40:00 -
[31] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:
Because tanking is my passion.
20x the WPs? xD are you dumb? You don't get 20x the WP, you can get double the WP if you decide to kill every bolas in the game (buff bolas plz), never seen anyone hit over the 6k mark yet, definitely seen Infantry with 3k WP.
But really, I like spending 2.3 mil and risking it every game, it's a risk that gives me a reason to play.
Oh I'm sorry, did I exaggerate a bit? My passion is infantry vs infantry, so why can't I enjoy that too without having a tank ruin an ambush match for me? Using my assault AV fit reaps little rewards, mostly loss. Unless I can manage to take out several tanks/vehicles, usually all I do is tickle tanks all match long and end up getting killed by infantry slayers, then spawning and getting killed again because my team is getting steamrolled.. rinse and repeat. I get a garbage payout, garbage SP, and usually take a hit on my KDR (since I can't kill squat with swarms and crappy sidearm vs dedicated infantry vs infantry players). Apparently tankers get what they want, so why can't we infantry vs infantry players get a small break? Why would you be against an ambush mode without tanks?
We get what we want? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!! That's some funny ass ****. lol, pilots get what we want....
Peace, Godin |
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
499
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 10:41:00 -
[32] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:
Because tanking is my passion.
20x the WPs? xD are you dumb? You don't get 20x the WP, you can get double the WP if you decide to kill every bolas in the game (buff bolas plz), never seen anyone hit over the 6k mark yet, definitely seen Infantry with 3k WP.
But really, I like spending 2.3 mil and risking it every game, it's a risk that gives me a reason to play.
Oh I'm sorry, did I exaggerate a bit? My passion is infantry vs infantry, so why can't I enjoy that too without having a tank ruin an ambush match for me? Using my assault AV fit reaps little rewards, mostly loss. Unless I can manage to take out several tanks/vehicles, usually all I do is tickle tanks all match long and end up getting killed by infantry slayers, then spawning and getting killed again because my team is getting steamrolled.. rinse and repeat. I get a garbage payout, garbage SP, and usually take a hit on my KDR (since I can't kill squat with swarms and crappy sidearm vs dedicated infantry vs infantry players). Apparently tankers get what you want, so why can't we infantry vs infantry players get a small break? Why would you be against an ambush mode without tanks? If you want infantry vs infantry, go play something else. Complaining about an established gaming mechanic makes you look selfish and ignorant. Also, you're not supposed to solo a tank, AV need teamwork just like the teamwork the tank is getting when you try to approach it with your your swarms and crappy sidearm. Why are you using swarms anyway? AV grenades are OP, remember? You got one topic saying teamwork is OP and now you got another one saying HAV is OP. If this keeps up, people are just going to get the impression you just suck. HTFU! |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1014
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 10:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:
Because tanking is my passion.
20x the WPs? xD are you dumb? You don't get 20x the WP, you can get double the WP if you decide to kill every bolas in the game (buff bolas plz), never seen anyone hit over the 6k mark yet, definitely seen Infantry with 3k WP.
But really, I like spending 2.3 mil and risking it every game, it's a risk that gives me a reason to play.
Oh I'm sorry, did I exaggerate a bit? My passion is infantry vs infantry, so why can't I enjoy that too without having a tank ruin an ambush match for me? Using my assault AV fit reaps little rewards, mostly loss. Unless I can manage to take out several tanks/vehicles, usually all I do is tickle tanks all match long and end up getting killed by infantry slayers, then spawning and getting killed again because my team is getting steamrolled.. rinse and repeat. I get a garbage payout, garbage SP, and usually take a hit on my KDR (since I can't kill squat with swarms and crappy sidearm vs dedicated infantry vs infantry players). Apparently tankers get what they want, so why can't we infantry vs infantry players get a small break? Why would you be against an ambush mode without tanks?
Just a little ;)
My passion is stomp Infantry, but I can't enjoy that as there are things that will counter me as well! Then your problem is not the vehicles, but the rewards, which I fully support, AVers need better rewards to make it a more viable profession to specialize into, same with many other Tankers, we all feel specialized AVers don't get rewarded for the job they do. If they take out my 2.3 mil tank, they deserve ateast 1/2 of that.
Perhaps you need to look at what you're fighting when using your swarms. Armor tanks are your prey, not Shield Tanks, you need to learn that, you are the counter to Armor, that's why you tickle other tanks, we don't take nearly as much damage from swarms as armor tankers. It also seems to me you are playing without a Squad, which again is an issue. Matchmaking should focus on putting Squads together and Solos together, not putting two squads on one team and the solos on the other, it's bad.
I refuse to even acknowledge a mode with vehicular restrictions, in Uprising, Vehicles are becoming a specialized class really, anyone you see with a proper tank won't have any infantry skills, as all the core skills that we once shared are being separated. You cannot play DUST and expect it to protect you from other elements of the game. I can't ask CCP to give us an all Vehicle Mode nor a Infantry only mode, we can ask for maps that heavily favour one or the other, but note a mode with those restrictions.
What you really need, is a map with indoor areas, so that you can escape the vehicles.
|
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
397
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 11:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:
Just a little ;)
My passion is stomp Infantry, but I can't enjoy that as there are things that will counter me as well! Then your problem is not the vehicles, but the rewards, which I fully support, AVers need better rewards to make it a more viable profession to specialize into, same with many other Tankers, we all feel specialized AVers don't get rewarded for the job they do. If they take out my 2.3 mil tank, they deserve ateast 1/2 of that.
Perhaps you need to look at what you're fighting when using your swarms. Armor tanks are your prey, not Shield Tanks, you need to learn that, you are the counter to Armor, that's why you tickle other tanks, we don't take nearly as much damage from swarms as armor tankers. It also seems to me you are playing without a Squad, which again is an issue. Matchmaking should focus on putting Squads together and Solos together, not putting two squads on one team and the solos on the other, it's bad.
I refuse to even acknowledge a mode with vehicular restrictions, in Uprising, Vehicles are becoming a specialized class really, anyone you see with a proper tank won't have any infantry skills, as all the core skills that we once shared are being separated. You cannot play DUST and expect it to protect you from other elements of the game. I can't ask CCP to give us an all Vehicle Mode nor a Infantry only mode, we can ask for maps that heavily favour one or the other, but note a mode with those restrictions.
What you really need, is a map with indoor areas, so that you can escape the vehicles.
Actually, an all vehicle mode (tanks vs tanks) would be pretty awesome I think. I come from games like Warhawk, first thing I did was pure dogfights with the hawks. No infantry, no tanks, just hawk vs hawk dog-fighting all the time. It was amazing. Then I moved onto the more complex modes, which included every class possible (infantry, tanks, jeeps, turrets, and hawks), which changed the gameplay drastically. Required more teamwork, clans, organization etc.
I don't see why there shouldn't be a tank vs tank gamemode, I mean when I see freindly players bring in tanks specifically to battle enemy tanks, I think "That is the proper role of a tank, to take on other tanks and vehicles". But tanks vs infantry is just so... no offense... cowardly. Most players in ambush are not prepared to take on a tank, especially one with the experience you have. Ambush players want to fight other infantry players, it's the natural role of a TDM match in a FPS. If i want to fight tanks, dropships, LAV's and organized squads and go for objectives, I will play skirmish.
The thing is, even if AV offered a decent reward, that is not my preferred play style. I like fighting other infantry. When I want to enjoy the other stuff, skirmish (or OMS) should be my choice.
|
Zero Harpuia
WarRavens Orion Empire
433
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 11:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:
Because tanking is my passion.
20x the WPs? xD are you dumb? You don't get 20x the WP, you can get double the WP if you decide to kill every bolas in the game (buff bolas plz), never seen anyone hit over the 6k mark yet, definitely seen Infantry with 3k WP.
But really, I like spending 2.3 mil and risking it every game, it's a risk that gives me a reason to play.
Oh I'm sorry, did I exaggerate a bit? My passion is infantry vs infantry, so why can't I enjoy that too without having a tank ruin an ambush match for me? Using my assault AV fit reaps little rewards, mostly loss. Unless I can manage to take out several tanks/vehicles, usually all I do is tickle tanks all match long and end up getting killed by infantry slayers, then spawning and getting killed again because my team is getting steamrolled.. rinse and repeat. I get a garbage payout, garbage SP, and usually take a hit on my KDR (since I can't kill squat with swarms and crappy sidearm vs dedicated infantry vs infantry players). Apparently tankers get what you want, so why can't we infantry vs infantry players get a small break? Why would you be against an ambush mode without tanks? If you want infantry vs infantry, go play something else. Complaining about an established gaming mechanic makes you look selfish and ignorant. Also, you're not supposed to solo a tank, AV need teamwork just like the teamwork the tank is getting when you try to approach it with your your swarms and crappy sidearm. Why are you using swarms anyway? AV grenades are OP, remember? You got one topic saying teamwork is OP and now you got another one saying HAV is OP. If this keeps up, people are just going to get the impression you just suck. HTFU!
Calm yourself. All he is asking for is an area with no vehicles, like almost every other shooter ever has had. Alot of people toggle off vehicles when they play Blood Gulch, this is the same idea, and it is PERFECTLY WITHIN EVE LORE. In EVE, you have two limiters: Low Sec to Null sec splits and the size of an instance's entrance. In EVE, the biggest ships are not allowed into the central areas of the game, where players start. This is to prevent players who spent a TON of SP and money to lord their advantage of sheer size over the frigate and cruiser players, noobs and veterans alike. The instance entrances are usually too small for most of the big ships not just in Hi Sec, but in Low and Null as well. This is to prevent players from becoming too dependent on their hulking death machine that they forget how to fly a smaller and more agile craft. All we have at the moment are small instances of pewpew, so removing the biggest, most flow altering element is actually a very EVE-esque thing to do. Plus, I want you to tell me right now, with a straight face, that a new player plopped into their first Ambush has ANY chance against a tank. It's like asking a Burst to fight an Avatar. |
Spkr4theDead
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 14:39:00 -
[36] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:HA! of course, this guy has never used a HAV before. I doubt he hasn't been inside one for more than a minute, or talked to the pilots who use them. NO. Peace, Godin You do realize that the DJINN are some of the more notorious tankers, right? Not sure which are the pilots myself, but I'm sure he has decent experience on both sides of the issue. They probably run Ambush and Skirmish teams. The guys that go in skirmish use tanks. This guy obviously plays Ambush, so I doubt he has experience with more than just the Sica/Soma. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1019
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 17:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:
Just a little ;)
My passion is stomp Infantry, but I can't enjoy that as there are things that will counter me as well! Then your problem is not the vehicles, but the rewards, which I fully support, AVers need better rewards to make it a more viable profession to specialize into, same with many other Tankers, we all feel specialized AVers don't get rewarded for the job they do. If they take out my 2.3 mil tank, they deserve ateast 1/2 of that.
Perhaps you need to look at what you're fighting when using your swarms. Armor tanks are your prey, not Shield Tanks, you need to learn that, you are the counter to Armor, that's why you tickle other tanks, we don't take nearly as much damage from swarms as armor tankers. It also seems to me you are playing without a Squad, which again is an issue. Matchmaking should focus on putting Squads together and Solos together, not putting two squads on one team and the solos on the other, it's bad.
I refuse to even acknowledge a mode with vehicular restrictions, in Uprising, Vehicles are becoming a specialized class really, anyone you see with a proper tank won't have any infantry skills, as all the core skills that we once shared are being separated. You cannot play DUST and expect it to protect you from other elements of the game. I can't ask CCP to give us an all Vehicle Mode nor a Infantry only mode, we can ask for maps that heavily favour one or the other, but note a mode with those restrictions.
What you really need, is a map with indoor areas, so that you can escape the vehicles.
Actually, an all vehicle mode (tanks vs tanks) would be pretty awesome I think. I come from games like Warhawk, first thing I did was pure dogfights with the hawks. No infantry, no tanks, just hawk vs hawk dog-fighting all the time. It was amazing. Then I moved onto the more complex modes, which included every class possible (infantry, tanks, jeeps, turrets, and hawks), which changed the gameplay drastically. Required more teamwork, clans, organization etc. I don't see why there shouldn't be a tank vs tank gamemode, I mean when I see freindly players bring in tanks specifically to battle enemy tanks, I think "That is the proper role of a tank, to take on other tanks and vehicles". But tanks vs infantry is just so... no offense... cowardly. Most players in ambush are not prepared to take on a tank, especially one with the experience you have. Ambush players want to fight other infantry players, it's the natural role of a TDM match in a FPS. If i want to fight tanks, dropships, LAV's and organized squads and go for objectives, I will play skirmish. The thing is, even if AV offered a decent reward, that is not my preferred play style. I like fighting other infantry. When I want to enjoy the other stuff, skirmish (or OMS) should be my choice.
One thing I noticed, you call players who use Tanks against Infantry cowards, and believe Tanks should only fight other tanks.. If all Tanks did was fight other tanks, how would anyone use tanks? You may not like it but Tankers need to destroy infantry, this creates a fear for them so that there is a reason to have a friendly tank on your side.
I take no offense, I play a role in DUST, which is a giant target in DUST, everyone wants me dead because I'm deadly and if you don't destroy me, I'll destroy you.
If there was a Tank v Tank mode, it would be like having an infantry match with Snipers only, there is no true goal just destroy ****, it's not fun and it's just very expensive. If there were separate modes for these I'd hate the game. You can't compare DUST modes and vehicles to other games either as it doesn't cost in other games, there is no risk if you lose your tank in WoT, there no risk if you lose you Hawk in Warhawk, just respawn and do it again.
I understand where you are coming from with what you're saying, but I don't agree. Making a separate mode for vehicles (Which again, if you check the skill tree, is now it's own class that takes a shitton of SP), means you separate some of the player base from the other with ridiculous restrictions that shouldn't be in place for a game like this. Again, I really want Infantry based maps where Tankers can't be used very effectively, with indoor areas that link up, and underground sections and such to dodge from air combat, but you cannot have an Infantry only game mode when Vehicles take so much to skill into.
If the vehicles didn't require such skills and anyone could use them, sure, but it's not the case. Your choice is simple, Adapt or Die, as many people keep telling us Tankers (Despite us whining about the fact our Rails are ridiculously strong and it means we become Rail Snipers, we're told to do it anyways -_-)
On the plus side, the better Tankers will be in FW and PC as Ambush doesn't pay enough. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |