Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1165
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:48:00 -
[31] - Quote
Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:1. Not trolling. Disqualified for lying. Start your own club and get out of my thread. Wow, the democratic air sure got blown away so quickly. "Get out of my thread," this isn't your thread, this isn't anyone's thread, this is a discussion and if you don't like what I am saying, you can ignore me, argue with me, but you can't tell me to get out of "your thread". I just did. For continuing to argue, you're now disqualified from future council attempts. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1165
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Where's the credibility threat? "we don't trust anyone but ourselves," The real reason that this is wrong, now that interest in maintaining this thread is gone, is that I'm pretty happy with the current CPM.
|
Veiny Throbbing Joystick
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
You disqualify me? Were you ever qualified to make this thread? I disqualify this thread, and I disqualify you from making any future replies on this subject. |
Gunmouse
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
50
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:53:00 -
[34] - Quote
Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:Troll-shield activated.
Trolls are everywhere, just learn to ignore them and stay on topic.
I, Sir V. Joystick, hereby declare my intent to run for The Peeple's Council.
PLOT TWIST.... YOU ARE THE TROLL |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1274
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:54:00 -
[35] - Quote
slypie11 wrote:Honestly, I don't know why we need another council to govern the council. If we the people have a problem with the CPM, then everyone speaks out.
I strongly believe in setting up a fair and open election process for CPM1. If the community feels the current council members haven't done a good job at the end of the CPM 0 term then they should be voted out and replaced with new representatives.
At the end of this the council answers to the community and no one else. |
Veiny Throbbing Joystick
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
Gunmouse wrote:Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:Troll-shield activated.
Trolls are everywhere, just learn to ignore them and stay on topic.
I, Sir V. Joystick, hereby declare my intent to run for The Peeple's Council.
PLOT TWIST.... YOU ARE THE TROLL Where did that even come from? Calling people trolls out of the blue? Is this how this works now? |
DigiOps
DUST University Ivy League
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:I can't take you seriously with that IMPSwarm corp tag. Shouldn't be so quick to judge. There's only a few individuals I don't care for (which goes for members in a few other corps as well), but corp or alliance affiliation shouldn't be a reason to disregard a well written and thought out post. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1165
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:Where did that even come from? Calling people trolls out of the blue? Is this how this works now? Yes. |
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1165
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:58:00 -
[39] - Quote
DigiOps wrote:Logi Bro wrote:I can't take you seriously with that IMPSwarm corp tag. Shouldn't be so quick to judge. There's only a few individuals I don't care for (which goes for members in a few other corps as well), but corp or alliance affiliation shouldn't be a reason to disregard a well written and thought out post. To be fair, Logi Bro was right not to take this particular thread seriously.
I just hope he doesn't base all future interaction on the tag, especially with a couple of weeks worth of missed posts in between. |
Keyser Soze VerbalKint
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
187
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
A watchdog group for a watchdog group.
God bless good ole fashioned bureaucracy.
Okay for the real feedback on this. I applaud the effort Mith but in truth its a redundant effort. Ultimately the real issue is getting an elected CPM and for that to occur CPM needs a charter of ideals, bylaws, and mechanisms for not only election but removal and no-confidence votes.
However a thing to remember about unfiltered democracy and the underpinning on why America(the example i know best) was established as a republic, Mob rule is bad, especially when in the hands of an uninformed electorate. Unlike MMO troll FPS trolls are the masters of public assassinations and smear campaigns(sure mmo guys do it well, but FPS guys are ruthless).
This means if no-votes and recall is a mechanism in the hands of the people it becomes very easy for savvy political operators to begin to create discontent by pushing hot button issues and swelling up a mob through disinforamtion, half truth and isolation(aka the FOX News model).
There was a reason why the Senate prior to the 17th amendment was appointed by state legislature instead of directly elected because the position of power(only 2/state) was too great to put in the hands of mob rule.
This is why im a proponent that a part of the charter CPM test the idea(for future consideration to possibly CSM) a bicameral approach in which part of the seats are popularly elected and 1 maybe 2 seats are appointed by CCP after interview with the candidates, seeking the post. It serves as a sanity check for CCP but also ensure the council is truly balanced on all effects.
Why this instead of all full player elected seats? Because politics are a dirty business and power blocks begin to form and mud begins to fling. Having 1-2 appointees at least ensure CCP person(s) they feel can serve as perhaps a mediatior when opposing and vocal elected officials begin to clash behind closed doors and serves as a check against wildly changing attitudes and fluctuating demographics that are likely to occur in a F2P FPS community. |
|
Mithridates VI
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
1167
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote:A watchdog group for a watchdog group.
God bless good ole fashioned bureaucracy.
Okay for the real feedback on this. I applaud the effort Mith but in truth its a redundant effort. Ultimately the real issue is getting an elected CPM and for that to occur CPM needs a charter of ideals, bylaws, and mechanisms for not only election but removal and no-confidence votes.
However a thing to remember about unfiltered democracy and the underpinning on why America(the example i know best) was established as a republic, Mob rule is bad, especially when in the hands of an uninformed electorate. Unlike MMO troll FPS trolls are the masters of public assassinations and smear campaigns(sure mmo guys do it well, but FPS guys are ruthless).
This means if no-votes and recall is a mechanism in the hands of the people it becomes very easy for savvy political operators to begin to create discontent by pushing hot button issues and swelling up a mob through disinforamtion, half truth and isolation(aka the FOX News model).
There was a reason why the Senate prior to the 17th amendment was appointed by state legislature instead of directly elected because the position of power(only 2/state) was too great to put in the hands of mob rule.
This is why im a proponent that a part of the charter CPM test the idea(for future consideration to possibly CSM) a bicameral approach in which part of the seats are popularly elected and 1 maybe 2 seats are appointed by CCP after interview with the candidates, seeking the post. It serves as a sanity check for CCP but also ensure the council is truly balanced on all effects.
Why this instead of all full player elected seats? Because politics are a dirty business and power blocks begin to form and mud begins to fling. Having 1-2 appointees at least ensure CCP person(s) they feel can serve as perhaps a mediatior when opposing and vocal elected officials begin to clash behind closed doors and serves as a check against wildly changing attitudes and fluctuating demographics that are likely to occur in a F2P FPS community.
This is a good post and I would like to see it outside of a troll thread.
(Yes, I'm a bad troll for calling out my own troll thread) |
Keyser Soze VerbalKint
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
187
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:02:00 -
[42] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Where's the credibility threat? Not specifying this thread, but rather all threads as a whole. I think this thread was less biased than it was influenced by Imp mentality. By that I mean the, "we don't trust anyone but ourselves," mentality that most people possess but Imps make most verbal. My point isn't that you intentionally change info to suit your corp, but rather you are passively influenced to your own corp members' views, which in turn changes credibility.
Too bad despite how hard we try Mith resists our attempts to assimilate him into the Borg collective. Freaking goody goody |
Tiberion Deci
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
76
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 03:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:People's council (CPM watchdog): Mithridates VI Veiny Throbbing Joystick Tiberion Deci
People's council watchdog: Crash Monster Not I. Then it is down to me and Tiberion Deci. Tibby, do you wanna go over the issue of CPM openly exploiting afk?
Sure. the issue is that its essentially an exploit that hasn't been condemned by CCP and because of that it is being done by many players "because they haven't said not to do it". I have already expressed that I think it is something just short of cheating and would like to have it removed because it ruins the game for those of us who want to play, unjustly rewards who don't, and promotes behavior that makes the game difficult for new players.
In addition to all of this, the fact that some members of the CPM openly boast/ talk about/ support AFKing is setting a bad signal for the community when they should be out in front discouraging players from doing this.
That's the short version, sound about right? |
General Tiberius1
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
471
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 03:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
lol, nice troll thread mith, by the way, when did you join the imps?
lmao, are they getting desperate enough that they need an army of alt spies to bolster their numbers? |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
383
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 09:06:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:With recent dissatisfaction in mind,I am looking to form a community elected, community managed, community focused collection of mercenaries to act as a watchdog agency for the Council of Planetary Management...
If necessary, this organisation may in future declare the CPM unfit on behalf of the players who recognise this organisation and assume that organisation's responsibilities. The CPM does not work without the community's support. I want you all to remember that you have the power here.
This thread will act as an initial discussion ground and a forum to register expressions of interest in running for The People's Council. A voting system, specifics yet to be announced, will be implemented to choose true player representatives.
Template: I [name here] hereby declare my intent to run for The People's Council.
Its a nice idea
But what we dont want is mulitiple ppl from the same corp
Want we do want tho is ppl who are good at various parts of the game and play it exclusively, so heavy/logi/scout/assault/tanks/dropships/lavs
I Takahiro Kashuken hereby declare my intent to run for The People's Council on behalf of all Vehicle users (HAVs) i dont use dropships someone else can do that role
Unless someone else wants it |
Llan Heindell
One-Armed Bandits Atrocitas
24
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 09:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71817&find=unread Refer to the link above for a more in depth thread on how to make things better and why a 100% community elected council is not a great idea.
Live long and prosper. Llan Heindell. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |