| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
63
   |
Posted - 2013.04.05 03:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
Petitions
i liked the old skirmish but not enough to bring it back from the dead |
Winscar Shinobi
Better Hide R Die
146
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 03:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Icy TIG3R wrote:If you guys had played the REAL Skirmish 1.0, you would realize why half the player base afk's in the MCC all day.
It was the best. Miss it so much. |
Deluxe Edition
TeamPlayers
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
Signed!
|
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Corporation
CRONOS.
258
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
Signed of course. |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
Icy TIG3R wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Icy TIG3R wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Can't you just wait until Uprising. They said they'll have new gamemode variations. Also use the search engine before posting. It's also funny because people were complaining about skirmish 1.0 because defending team almost always lost. Or maybe it was the offense that always lost. Not too sure anymore but pretty sure it was defending team. Please just stop. You've never played it. You haven't been here for months like I have. Don't tell me about Search. And I've seen what their gamemode "variations" are like. Just switching around objectives does not make it a KITTEN NEW GAME MODE! I've been here since E3 build so stfu lol E3 build. The days when all scrubs got in. I've been here since the Second build, and Replication.
Aww you feel special that you've been playing longer then me. How cute.
Really who gives a flying fk. |
InsidiousN
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
Agreed, Skirmish 1.0 was the BEST game mode. I don't understand why CCP would so obviously shoot themselves in the foot. It would be nice if a DEV could explain to us why they removed the game mode that was the most fun, as well as made the most sense for attacking and defending planets. Please CCP explain. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
466
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP - clear proof that gameplay trumps balance. That map told a story. Learn.
Signed. |
Sete Clifton
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
81
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 04:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
I wasn't in the closed beta, but from what I've heard about it, I've always thought the old skirmish would make more sense for PC anyway because there were actually attackers and defenders, not just two attackers (which doesn't really make sense for the side that owns the district).
In any case, I'd like to see it come back, it sounds a lot better than what we currently have. |
2-Ton Twenty-One
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
448
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 05:18:00 -
[39] - Quote
skirmish 1.0 ran like crap. if it runs well sure, if it runs like a 1 legged fat man again no. |
StarBurst Stream
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 05:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
signed
|
|
|
Aeon Amadi
WarRavens
1138
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 06:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
/signed. Been wanting this for a while. CCP Cmdr_Wang stated that it was a "maybe". |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon Plus
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 07:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
+1'd. Though hopefully it'll be in uprising. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1269
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:02:00 -
[43] - Quote
/signed even though i'm sure "new game modes" will just be PC and revamped FW.
And wait, i'll sign with all my alts. Worth it. |
Cazaderon
What The French
CRONOS.
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:02:00 -
[44] - Quote
/signed |
Test Cazaderon
Algintal Core
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
/signed |
GR1NCH
Destruction Initiative Enterprise
201
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:02:00 -
[46] - Quote
signed |
The Loathing
The Southern Legion
RISE of LEGION
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:07:00 -
[47] - Quote
/signed.
Don't remove current skirmish, just bring back 1.0 and re-badge with a new title.
While we are at it, it would be flippin' awesome if we saw a Capture The Flag variant and a Militia Only variant in the next build! |
dust badger
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
295
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:16:00 -
[48] - Quote
signed
|
lucy vodka
Tronhadar Free Guard
Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
/Signed
cant like this thread enough |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
406
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 08:33:00 -
[50] - Quote
Was removed with a shockingly bad excuse of balance. To which the correct response would have been to balance the map but as what became established as normal the nuked the idea and replaced it with something noone liked from inception.
Dust is the only game where I feel it has gone backwards as development progressed. Sure the Ie and crashes have stopped but that just having somthing run. The gameplay of dust has declined dramaticy since the trials. |
|
|
Gilbatron
Free-Space-Ranger
Nulli Secunda
84
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 09:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
i want my old remote explosives back :( |
Calgoth Reborn
United Front LLC
223
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 09:18:00 -
[52] - Quote
I wouldn't mind the old skirmish as long as they upped the health of the first stage null cannon's 1 tank could just rip them apart or even just swarms could kill them. It was nice preventing the enemy team from hacking those 2 if they didn't bring tank's in and never got to the second stage |
Brush Master
HavoK Core
319
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 12:27:00 -
[53] - Quote
Calgoth Reborn wrote:I wouldn't mind the old skirmish as long as they upped the health of the first stage null cannon's 1 tank could just rip them apart or even just swarms could kill them. It was nice preventing the enemy team from hacking those 2 if they didn't bring tank's in and never got to the second stage
Definitely a big increase in health. They could make them hack points that could be destroyable but take a lot of hits to destroy. The attackers have to keep the points hacked long enough or have a couple tanks working on it to destroy it for their MCC to get to the second line of defense. |
ICECREAMK1NG
WARRIORS 1NC
441
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:02:00 -
[54] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Was removed with a shockingly bad excuse of balance. To which the correct response would have been to balance the map but as what became established as normal the nuked the idea and replaced it with something noone liked from inception.
Dust is the only game where I feel it has gone backwards as development progressed. Sure the Ie and crashes have stopped but that just having somthing run. The gameplay of dust has declined dramaticy since the trials.
This.^
And @ icy tiger, better late than never I suppose. Guess my boredom threshold is lower than yours. And whoever said it, yes you should use the search function. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
1271
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:17:00 -
[55] - Quote
Calgoth Reborn wrote:I wouldn't mind the old skirmish as long as they upped the health of the first stage null cannon's 1 tank could just rip them apart or even just swarms could kill them. It was nice preventing the enemy team from hacking those 2 if they didn't bring tank's in and never got to the second stage
I wouldnt say raise health. I'd say make them undestructible and change mecanics so both defense relay have to be hacked at the same time. (not at the same time, but be both owned by the attackers) Add a nice visual effect like a shield barrier round the outpost to give lore and explain why those defense relay actually matter.
THIS would promote actual teamplay and give a feeling of conquest. Add to that buffing A LOT health of turrets and you would get an actually very strategic game with infantry moving to take assets allowing tanks to move into position and hold the ground, people covering one objective while others try to conquer it. etc..
Skirmish 2.0 is a joke. a game mode from the 90s. |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
407
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Tbh to this day we never got a reason on why it was removed it was only implied that their was A balance issue which during my experience I never found. And they never proabaly realised that the skilled players just made sure they were defending all the time. But to notice that they would have to been paying attention to the player base at the time |
commando biffle
Shadow Company HQ
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
+1 |
Icy TIG3R
Universal Allies Inc.
51
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 20:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Tbh to this day we never got a reason on why it was removed it was only implied that their was A balance issue which during my experience I never found. And they never proabaly realised that the skilled players just made sure they were defending all the time. But to notice that they would have to been paying attention to the player base at the time
It was a tiny balance issue that could've been solved in numerous ways but wasn't. What we have now is Domination, running in circles for objectives, and redlines.
What we had before were epic battles. Even though the game ran pretty bad at the time and there were disgustingly bad spawn mechanics, I still loved Skirmish 1.0 and Craterlake, and it's the only reason I played. |
Maximus Stryker
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
414
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 20:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
signed.
caveat: don't get rid of skirmish 2.0  just add back in skirmish 1.0 for more variety... |
Logi Bro
Eyniletti Rangers
Minmatar Republic
1046
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 20:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
They aren't going to make any changes till Uprising, so we'll all have to wait. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |