|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Icy TIG3R
Universal Allies Inc.
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 23:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP you've said that you listen to the players. So please, hear us now.
Bring back Skirmish 1.0.
|
Icy TIG3R
Universal Allies Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Can't you just wait until Uprising. They said they'll have new gamemode variations. Also use the search engine before posting. It's also funny because people were complaining about skirmish 1.0 because defending team almost always lost. Or maybe it was the offense that always lost. Not too sure anymore but pretty sure it was defending team.
Please just stop. You've never played it. You haven't been here for months like I have. Don't tell me about Search. And I've seen what their gamemode "variations" are like. Just switching around objectives does not make it a KITTEN NEW GAME MODE! |
Icy TIG3R
Universal Allies Inc.
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 02:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Icy TIG3R wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Can't you just wait until Uprising. They said they'll have new gamemode variations. Also use the search engine before posting. It's also funny because people were complaining about skirmish 1.0 because defending team almost always lost. Or maybe it was the offense that always lost. Not too sure anymore but pretty sure it was defending team. Please just stop. You've never played it. You haven't been here for months like I have. Don't tell me about Search. And I've seen what their gamemode "variations" are like. Just switching around objectives does not make it a KITTEN NEW GAME MODE! I've been here since E3 build so stfu
lol E3 build. The days when all scrubs got in. I've been here since the Second build, and Replication. |
Icy TIG3R
Universal Allies Inc.
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 02:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
If you guys had played the REAL Skirmish 1.0, you would realize why half the player base afk's in the MCC all day.
|
Icy TIG3R
Universal Allies Inc.
51
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 20:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Tbh to this day we never got a reason on why it was removed it was only implied that their was A balance issue which during my experience I never found. And they never proabaly realised that the skilled players just made sure they were defending all the time. But to notice that they would have to been paying attention to the player base at the time
It was a tiny balance issue that could've been solved in numerous ways but wasn't. What we have now is Domination, running in circles for objectives, and redlines.
What we had before were epic battles. Even though the game ran pretty bad at the time and there were disgustingly bad spawn mechanics, I still loved Skirmish 1.0 and Craterlake, and it's the only reason I played. |
Icy TIG3R
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 03:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:Calgoth Reborn wrote:I wouldn't mind the old skirmish as long as they upped the health of the first stage null cannon's 1 tank could just rip them apart or even just swarms could kill them. It was nice preventing the enemy team from hacking those 2 if they didn't bring tank's in and never got to the second stage I'm thinking that life would be a lot harder for those tanks today.
I think that they should just remove damage, instead make 3 points instead of 2 to compensate for more players. |
Icy TIG3R
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
65
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 14:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Thank you people, keep the support coming.
This is what we are missing out: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cHUo9UPiq8A/T4Dh9SZ2cgI/AAAAAAAAAUs/974DrF3vpGY/s640/Grenade+launcher+mass+driver.png |
Icy TIG3R
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 20:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Luke Vetri wrote:signed
although I'm sure they are in uprising I doubt it, based on earlier posts and IRC, they haven't fully decided to bring it back. |
|
|
|