Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Void Echo
A.I.
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
why is it that when someone posts a "tanks are op" thread anywhere, the majority of the posts n that thread are agreeing with it yet when there a thread saying that av equipment is op (which a lot of it is) everyone jumps in and says it needs to be buffed not nerfed WTF? theres no logic in that other than the infantry of this game wanting to make this another COD game. |
Forlorn Destrier
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
932
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:why is it that when someone posts a "tanks are op" thread anywhere, the majority of the posts n that thread are agreeing with it yet when there a thread saying that av equipment is op (which a lot of it is) everyone jumps in and says it needs to be buffed not nerfed WTF? theres no logic in that other than the infantry of this game wanting to make this another COD game.
Different people have different complaints, and anything that kills you must be over powered, right? I mean you're that good and all. (sarcasm not directed at poster) |
Void Echo
A.I.
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
according to the infantry of this game, anything not an assault riffle is either OP or shouldn't be in dust514 |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
56
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
seems quite logical....
everyone agrees tanks are OP, thus a complaint about AV would not be considered OP.
whether I agree or not is irrelevant, where the flaw in the logic? |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
230
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 21:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:why is it that when someone posts a "tanks are op" thread anywhere, the majority of the posts n that thread are agreeing with it yet when there a thread saying that av equipment is op (which a lot of it is) everyone jumps in and says it needs to be buffed not nerfed WTF? theres no logic in that other than the infantry of this game wanting to make this another COD game.
You mean like this accurate thread about how OP AV weapons are?
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=66528&find=unread
Perhaps it's because you're wrong. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2207
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:why is it that when someone posts a "tanks are op" thread anywhere, the majority of the posts n that thread are agreeing with it yet when there a thread saying that av equipment is op (which a lot of it is) everyone jumps in and says it needs to be buffed not nerfed WTF? theres no logic in that other than the infantry of this game wanting to make this another COD game. So you're confused that people who say tanks are OP get lots of agreement, while people who say the opposite get the opposite reaction?
I'm confused about why this is confusing...
Tanks are OP: Everyone says yes. Anti-tank weapons are OP: Everyone says no.
Most players think (incorrectly) that tanks are more powerful than they should be. If they were correct, the logical solutions would be to either buff AV or nerf tanks. When someone says tanks are OP, people who think tanks are OP will agree. When someone says AV is OP, people who think tanks are OP will ask for a buff instead.
As someone who runs both AV and tanks on multiple characters, the balance between AV and vehicles is pretty good right now. There are issues with Missile Turrets having been over-nerfed, and some problems with even the better turrets having (only slightly) too many drawbacks for their advantages. If they straighten up how tank weapons work so they're more balanced instead of being underpowered, maybe AV will need a buff, but at the moment, it works well, and so do tanks. |
Void Echo
A.I.
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Void Echo wrote:why is it that when someone posts a "tanks are op" thread anywhere, the majority of the posts n that thread are agreeing with it yet when there a thread saying that av equipment is op (which a lot of it is) everyone jumps in and says it needs to be buffed not nerfed WTF? theres no logic in that other than the infantry of this game wanting to make this another COD game. So you're confused that people who say tanks are OP get lots of agreement, while people who say the opposite get the opposite reaction? I'm confused about why this is confusing... Tanks are OP: Everyone says yes. Anti-tank weapons are OP: Everyone says no. Most players think (incorrectly) that tanks are more powerful than they should be. If they were correct, the logical solutions would be to either buff AV or nerf tanks. When someone says tanks are OP, people who think tanks are OP will agree. When someone says AV is OP, people who think tanks are OP will ask for a buff instead. As someone who runs both AV and tanks on multiple characters, the balance between AV and vehicles is pretty good right now. There are issues with Missile Turrets having been over-nerfed, and some problems with even the better turrets having (only slightly) too many drawbacks for their advantages. If they straighten up how tank weapons work so they're more balanced instead of being underpowered, maybe AV will need a buff, but at the moment, it works well, and so do tanks.
interesting reply, im just wondering why nobody sees this flaw of judgment, every time someone cries "assaults are OP" everyone criticizes them, but when "everything else is OP" everyone says nerf it all. |
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
57
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Void Echo wrote:why is it that when someone posts a "tanks are op" thread anywhere, the majority of the posts n that thread are agreeing with it yet when there a thread saying that av equipment is op (which a lot of it is) everyone jumps in and says it needs to be buffed not nerfed WTF? theres no logic in that other than the infantry of this game wanting to make this another COD game. So you're confused that people who say tanks are OP get lots of agreement, while people who say the opposite get the opposite reaction? I'm confused about why this is confusing... Tanks are OP: Everyone says yes. Anti-tank weapons are OP: Everyone says no. Most players think (incorrectly) that tanks are more powerful than they should be. If they were correct, the logical solutions would be to either buff AV or nerf tanks. When someone says tanks are OP, people who think tanks are OP will agree. When someone says AV is OP, people who think tanks are OP will ask for a buff instead. As someone who runs both AV and tanks on multiple characters, the balance between AV and vehicles is pretty good right now. There are issues with Missile Turrets having been over-nerfed, and some problems with even the better turrets having (only slightly) too many drawbacks for their advantages. If they straighten up how tank weapons work so they're more balanced instead of being underpowered, maybe AV will need a buff, but at the moment, it works well, and so do tanks. interesting reply, im just wondering why nobody sees this flaw of judgment, every time someone cries "assaults are OP" everyone criticizes them, but when "everything else is OP" everyone says nerf it all.
the only surprising part about that is that people manage to agree on something. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2207
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:interesting reply, im just wondering why nobody sees this flaw of judgment, every time someone cries "assaults are OP" everyone criticizes them, but when "everything else is OP" everyone says nerf it all. Assaults are the most commonly-used suit. Everyone uses them, and is comfortable and familiar with them. Assault Rifles are the most commonly-used weapon. Everyone uses them, and is comfortable and familiar with them.
If something that's outside your comfort zone is killing you, regardless of what that something is, it must be OP.
Human logic is fail. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1148
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
What baffles me is that when someone posts the "tanks are OP" thread, everyone jumps in for support. However, when I post a thread about how the main tank turret should be controlled separately from the driver, everyone is against it. |
|
DUST Fiend
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
2170
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:What baffles me is that when someone posts the "tanks are OP" thread, everyone jumps in for support. However, when I post a thread about how the main tank turret should be controlled separately from the driver, everyone is against it.
Omg I've wanted this for forever.
|
Blamejudg3s KEQ
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
7
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 22:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Its all OP, smh.
Everything is OP in its appropriate usage therefore its not OP but balanced. On the otherhand if something is really powerful outside its intended use, therefore it should be OP.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |