Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. |
WyrmHero1945
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
60
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Close range AV like an AV shotgun??? |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? That's pretty much what I'm referring to, but at most they do little over a swarm launcher volley |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad.
still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots) |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? That's pretty much what I'm referring to, but at most they do little over a swarm launcher volley I have destroyed plenty of tanks with av grenades..... Nanohive and packed av grenades..... |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. That would explain all the whining from both sides about the other being op, this way if people want ti take down a Hav in the quickest way (depending in the scenario) they'll have to close the distance ir engage the Hav in a close quarters part if the map. |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots) But technically tanks can hold 3 people so therefor it should take more then one person to destroy it since you have a chance at getting a triple kill plus the 40 wp you get for destroying it. |
|
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
WyrmHero1945 wrote:Close range AV like an AV shotgun??? Basically but not as easy to kill infantry with |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:37:00 -
[12] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. That would explain all the whining from both sides about the other being op, this way if people want ti take down a Hav in the quickest way (depending in the scenario) they'll have to close the distance ir engage the Hav in a close quarters part if the map.
yeah, lets go engage the thing that kills us in half a second at close range, at close range!
seriously, in the open, vs a blaster tank, you getting within 40 yards and surviving is the sign of a terrible driver with crap gunners. |
Zekain Kade
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
the way it's set up now is that it's balanced so that the weakest Av weaponry has the opportunity to take down the best of tanks. While all the other vehicles in the game are either 1, or 2 shotted by the same militia Av weaponry.
Mtacs, fighters, gunships. They will all be so under powered. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:39:00 -
[14] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots) But technically tanks can hold 3 people so therefor it should take more then one person to destroy it since you have a chance at getting a triple kill plus the 40 wp you get for destroying it.
I only count the driver as most of the one's I've seen run alone to pubstomp ambushes. and redberries manning the guns, shooting at the MCC. |
Y0UR NAME HERE
UnReaL.
658
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:40:00 -
[15] - Quote
One guy can already solo a tank with Av grenades. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:40:00 -
[16] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? That's pretty much what I'm referring to, but at most they do little over a swarm launcher volley I have destroyed plenty of tanks with av grenades..... Nanohive and packed av grenades..... But from what I've seen the main complaint from tanks have been Av having toi much range while some Av people complain that they don't do enough damage, si this way Av players can choose between range and damage and have a noticeable gap in between the damage (I remember Av grenade damage for standards being in the range of 1100-1200 back when the damage was still shown |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? That's pretty much what I'm referring to, but at most they do little over a swarm launcher volley I have destroyed plenty of tanks with av grenades..... Nanohive and packed av grenades..... But from what I've seen the main complaint from tanks have been Av having toi much range while some Av people complain that they don't do enough damage, si this way Av players can choose between range and damage and have a noticeable gap in between the damage (I remember Av grenade damage for standards being in the range of 1100-1200 back when the damage was still shown
seeing as the only defense AV really has is range, I see that as a terrible idea. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:42:00 -
[18] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. That would explain all the whining from both sides about the other being op, this way if people want ti take down a Hav in the quickest way (depending in the scenario) they'll have to close the distance ir engage the Hav in a close quarters part if the map. yeah, lets go engage the thing that kills us in half a second at close range, at close range! seriously, in the open, vs a blaster tank, you getting within 40 yards and surviving is the sign of a terrible driver with crap gunners. That's only in the open, unless they're sniping from the back they won't be impossible to flank and they'd have very little short range defense being sniper fit |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:44:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? That's pretty much what I'm referring to, but at most they do little over a swarm launcher volley I have destroyed plenty of tanks with av grenades..... Nanohive and packed av grenades..... But from what I've seen the main complaint from tanks have been Av having toi much range while some Av people complain that they don't do enough damage, si this way Av players can choose between range and damage and have a noticeable gap in between the damage (I remember Av grenade damage for standards being in the range of 1100-1200 back when the damage was still shown
seeing as the only defense AV really has is range, I see that as a terrible idea.[/quote] Not really, it's always possible to flank it
Btw was this post directed towards our discussion? |
danny12343331
SyNergy Gaming
25
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
Y0UR NAME HERE wrote:One guy can already solo a tank with Av grenades.
Only if he's an ambush tanker, skirmish tankers on the other hand have better knowledge on how to counter AV personnel on ground. |
|
Chris F2112
Killshot Corp
12
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:46:00 -
[21] - Quote
This would certainly help dropships. And if it helps dropships, count me as for it. |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. That would explain all the whining from both sides about the other being op, this way if people want ti take down a Hav in the quickest way (depending in the scenario) they'll have to close the distance ir engage the Hav in a close quarters part if the map. yeah, lets go engage the thing that kills us in half a second at close range, at close range! seriously, in the open, vs a blaster tank, you getting within 40 yards and surviving is the sign of a terrible driver with crap gunners. That's only in the open, unless they're sniping from the back they won't be impossible to flank and they'd have very little short range defense being sniper fit
my sniping tank(my tanks are refitted militia for cost and skill point purposes) has small blaster turrets fitted for anyone deciding to get up in my face, and I only call it in when I have a squad willing to man the guns. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. That would explain all the whining from both sides about the other being op, this way if people want ti take down a Hav in the quickest way (depending in the scenario) they'll have to close the distance ir engage the Hav in a close quarters part if the map. yeah, lets go engage the thing that kills us in half a second at close range, at close range! seriously, in the open, vs a blaster tank, you getting within 40 yards and surviving is the sign of a terrible driver with crap gunners. That's only in the open, unless they're sniping from the back they won't be impossible to flank and they'd have very little short range defense being sniper fit my sniping tank(my tanks are refitted militia for cost and skill point purposes) has small blaster turrets fitted for anyone deciding to get up in my face, and I only call it in when I have a squad willing to man the guns. Even with your gunners you'll always have a blind spot and therefore a position you can be flanked from, especially when you factor you and your forward gunner facing the same way, and if people apply the same group Av strategy 1 Av person with a long range weapon could distract you while the other moves in for the killing blow |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
ignoring the top gun that has full mobility. and can watch my back. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Daringly Inserting Large Dangerous Objects
40
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:59:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots) But technically tanks can hold 3 people so therefor it should take more then one person to destroy it since you have a chance at getting a triple kill plus the 40 wp you get for destroying it. its 150 for tanks 75 for dropships and 40 for lavs |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
Chris F2112 wrote:This would certainly help dropships. And if it helps dropships, count me as for it. I'm glad someone sees my main point, for a lav or dropship to kill it has to get close or snipe which leaves it open to both or the long range form of Av |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:01:00 -
[27] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:ignoring the top gun that has full mobility. and can watch my back. Whose watching your right and left then? |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:09:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:ignoring the top gun that has full mobility. and can watch my back. Whose watching your right and left then?
My tanks ability to tank shots and leave, any driver who does not have at least 3 escape plans is bad. unless I get 3-5 shots from coordinated forges/swarms/vehicle nades(accounting for skill levels and damage mods) I can simply leave the area and get behind a hill/rock/building have the gunners cover one corner they can come around, use the main to cover the other.
if that much damage happens quickly enough that I could not even mount a defense then I was outmaneuvered. it means I need to get better, not scream that everything else needs a nerf. |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax. CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:09:00 -
[29] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots) But technically tanks can hold 3 people so therefor it should take more then one person to destroy it since you have a chance at getting a triple kill plus the 40 wp you get for destroying it. its 150 for tanks 75 for dropships and 40 for lavs Close enough lol. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:14:00 -
[30] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:ignoring the top gun that has full mobility. and can watch my back. Whose watching your right and left then? My tanks ability to tank shots and leave, any driver who does not have at least 3 escape plans is bad. unless I get 3-5 shots from coordinated forges/swarms/vehicle nades(accounting for skill levels and damage mods) I can simply leave the area and get behind a hill/rock/building have the gunners cover one corner they can come around, use the main to cover the other. if that much damage happens quickly enough that I could not even mount a defense then I was outmaneuvered. it means I need to get better, not scream that everything else needs a nerf. But it's not just a one sided complaint, crys of imbalance come from both pilots/drivers. That shows that there is an overall problem not one being over or under powered. Also how do you plan on not crashing every few seconds if you're driving while not watching the front |
|
2-Ton Twenty-One
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
348
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tanks are fine
-1
Tanker wants to solo tank more, big surprise..... |
Heathen Bastard
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:ignoring the top gun that has full mobility. and can watch my back. Whose watching your right and left then? My tanks ability to tank shots and leave, any driver who does not have at least 3 escape plans is bad. unless I get 3-5 shots from coordinated forges/swarms/vehicle nades(accounting for skill levels and damage mods) I can simply leave the area and get behind a hill/rock/building have the gunners cover one corner they can come around, use the main to cover the other. if that much damage happens quickly enough that I could not even mount a defense then I was outmaneuvered. it means I need to get better, not scream that everything else needs a nerf. But it's not just a one sided complaint, crys of imbalance come from both pilots/drivers. That shows that there is an overall problem not one being over or under powered. Also how do you plan on not crashing every few seconds if you're driving while not watching the front
A. Third Person view B. What me worry? they're cheap fits compared to a real tank and can still take quite a hit while providing firepower. |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
That view is pretty limited, it hardly defends other than against remote explosives |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
626
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:23:00 -
[34] - Quote
2-Ton Twenty-One wrote:Tanks are fine
-1
Tanker wants to solo tank more, big surprise..... If anything this encourages more tankers to pick up gunners to cover it |
Takahiro Kashuken
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
164
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 12:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
Fantastic
Lets raise HAV hp but on the other hand we will give AV yet another weapon to solo a tank with
*facepalm* |
Vermaak Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
629
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 12:12:00 -
[36] - Quote
And did you ignore that you have to get close to use said stronger Av?
Btw Let the thread die! |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2126
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 12:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
So there's this thing where Gallente are famed for short-range weapons.
And Plasma weapons typically have a short range.
And we've been shown artwork for an upcoming Gallente Plasma Cannon as an AV weapon.
Who else can see where I'm going with this...? |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
259
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 13:15:00 -
[38] - Quote
There was another thread about this... There were some ideas posted regarding signature radius and explosion radius. It would fix the LAV and DS being god-awful against AV, but tanks are in a good place right now. |
BlG MAMA
PLAYSTATION4
22
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 13:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
i have an ideea , upgrade your LAV if you plan to go on a trip into enemy territory |
Gelan Corbaine
BetaMax. CRONOS.
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 13:23:00 -
[40] - Quote
Sigh...... Let me tell you about a time back during closed beta where CCP decided to nerf the range of the Forge Gun severely . It sucked .......big time. ( Ah the days when Dropships mocked you by rising 2 meters) Forge gunners couldn't do their jobs and died ... a lot and usually ran deep in the red. Why ? Because close range AV is an absolutely stupid idea when you not only have to deal with the tank but all the guys around it. Squad cant protect you because you know tank . You cant protect squad because AI AND Tank . |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |