|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
107
   |
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts?
Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver.
Or one well coordinated squad. |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vermaak Doe wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vermaak Doe wrote:What I think should be done is to substantially raise the amount of hp all vehicles have across the board, now before you crucify me like a minmatar heretic hear me out. At the same time there should be really high damage Av that has a highly limited range. In this scenario long range Av would have it's place but only when deployed in groups, however by using the close range Av you can take said tank down the sane tank (both scenarios on paper) in a relatively shirt amount of time solo or at most with 2 total users if said close range Av.
Any thoughts? Close range AV.... What are AV grenades? That's pretty much what I'm referring to, but at most they do little over a swarm launcher volley
I have destroyed plenty of tanks with av grenades..... Nanohive and packed av grenades..... |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots)
But technically tanks can hold 3 people so therefor it should take more then one person to destroy it since you have a chance at getting a triple kill plus the 40 wp you get for destroying it. |
Kane Fyea
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
107
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 04:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:*Pulls hammer, nails, and 2x4s*
no, the current AV is good, in comparison to the old style of god-mode tanks that required the entire team to switch to AV to hope to take down a crappy driver. Or one well coordinated squad. still too much. one player should be defeatable by one player, a technical superiority(tank) should be defeated by a tactical superiority(learning to fire from cover and ducking shots) But technically tanks can hold 3 people so therefor it should take more then one person to destroy it since you have a chance at getting a triple kill plus the 40 wp you get for destroying it. its 150 for tanks 75 for dropships and 40 for lavs
Close enough lol. |
|
|
| |
|