|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
339
   |
Posted - 2013.03.08 04:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Who cares if there is a game mode with no vehicles? Sheesh, if you want to use your tank then just don't play in that mode, it's not like it would be the only mode available. Just look at OMS, almost no one uses tanks there because taking them out is pretty easy.
Ambush should not allow vehicles.
OMS should allow them.
What exactly is the problem with an Infantry only mode? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
339
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 04:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:your ability to use two completely unrelated topics to support one another is astounding.
What two different topics? Did I ever talk about anything that wasn't alternate game modes? The militia only mode was just an example of possible alternatives to ambush.
The topic at hand is a no vehicle mode, yet everyone else has gone off and started talking about balance. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
339
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 05:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:Breakin Stuff wrote:your ability to use two completely unrelated topics to support one another is astounding. What two different topics? The militia only mode was just an example of possible alternatives to ambush. The topic at hand is a no vehicle mode, yet everyone else has gone off and started talking about balance. Edit: my mistake, the variety part was directed at Ulysses. there should be no mode that renders any player irrelevant. a no-vehicle mode does this.
Because vehicle users are incapable of using a militia assault rifle? It renders Vehicles irrelevant, not the users. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
339
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 05:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote: you can only have fun our way, not yours."
Because the addition of new modes completely removes all pre existing modes? That makes no sense at all.
We don't need a solution, because there is no problem. The OP just wants a infantry only mode because it would be fun, not because he has a problem with tanks. I don't play skirmish because I find the whole objective thing boring, how is that any different? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
339
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 05:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Let me try and use an analogy.
If I go to a sushi place, am I going to ask for a hamburger? No. Does the existence of a sushi place mean that I can't get a burger elsewhere? No. If I want a burger, then I'll just go to a place that sells burgers. I'm not going to have the place shut down just because they don't have burgers.
If you want to use a vehicle then you wouldn't be interested in an infantry only mode anyway, why would that make anyone feel left out? My friends know I hate fish, so they don't invite me to seafood places, that doesn't bother me, because I DON"T LIKE FISH. The only way it would be "giving a good chunk of the player base the finger" would be if alternatives didn't exist. You're saying that certain modes shouldn't exist because not everyone would play them, really? That's like someone who only plays single player asking for multi-player to get cut just because they don't care for it.
Why do people insist on making things so complicated? |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
341
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 08:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:because we don't want you to be able to escape.
lol, I knew it |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
355
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 19:45:00 -
[7] - Quote
iLLMaTiC619 wrote:BASSMEANT wrote:so go buy a tank and learn to use it and quit whining.
Peace
B learn to read derp... smfh thinking yall are illiterate on here.. MY CORP has a tank and we smash on yall I am saying add another game mode... so we have more options to play
Don't listen to Assmeant, he literally says the same thing in every thread lol. |
|
|
| |
|