Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
283
 |
Posted - 2013.03.01 04:43:00 -
[61] - Quote
Gunner Nightingale wrote:
Because some ppl are very particular about keeping their fitting specs a secret, and if you can obtain the exact modules you use it may erk some people then again i say its the fault of a person who lost a fit with stuff that they dont want other people to know about.
This mentality really applies to tankers though. If this bounty system did every go live i think it should give the fit in terms of shell and weapon but not modules.
I know this is off the original topic but what you guys think?
I'm all for the bounty system, and yeah, just suit/shell weapons. Everything else can kind of be guessed at, though it's still a guess. |

trollface dot jpg
Destined 4 Biomass
32
 |
Posted - 2013.03.01 11:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
Belzeebub Santana wrote:I'm all for bonus points for the multi-kill and things like defending an objective and saving someone's life (savior) and head shots.
Kill streaks I can go without, have enough snipers already don't need to give extra incentive to camp.
I see going forward there to be a great variety to obtain WP.
Agreed 100%. Don't need killstreak rewards, but special accomplishment rewards are fine. Going 20/0 is far too easy, and adding incentive for people to be out trying to rack up kills instead of supporting the squad is ridiculous. Racking up kills isn't always supporting your squad.
Now maybe if it was 5 kills within 10~12 meters of a squad mate, 10 within 10~12, etc, but even that's pushing it. Killstreak rewards will do nothing but make CCP raise the WP needed for an OB since it would become that much easier to call them in.
Also, maybe have a higher WP bonus for getting a double, triple, or multi-kill with one shot, like a grenade or mass driver round.
As for AV, perhaps give a 20WP bonus for killing a swarmer or forge guner withing 5 seconds of them charging/locking on/firing their weapon. However AV still needs it's WP system fixed as well.... |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |