Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
37
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 18:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Simple son: Scrap terrible ideas from the get go, when you as a comunity know that a terrible idea should not implemented (like the UVT but hey if they are fools who want to was money on it), I think as many people do, that the mayor issues of the current builds had been convered.... that ccp had take notice of or not its up to them.
And second, you saprogenic mongoloid, if most of the oldschool beta testers have a unanimous grpe is the lack of reponse on CCP and you go like "well they dont have to" then THERE IS A ******* PROBLEM, wherether people like you who just seem to be a living congnitive dissonance, or CCP just rocking their chair saying "see, they are stupid, lets just keep running this beta as a jenga game", |
zeek1227 zeek1227
Blitzkrieg Co.
144
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 19:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote:Simple son: Scrap terrible ideas from the get go, when you as a comunity know that a terrible idea should not implemented (like the UVT but hey if they are fools who want to was money on it), I think as many people do, that the mayor issues of the current builds had been convered.... that ccp had take notice of or not its up to them.
And second, you saprogenic mongoloid, if most of the oldschool beta testers have a unanimous grpe is the lack of reponse on CCP and you go like "well they dont have to" then THERE IS A ******* PROBLEM, wherether people like you who just seem to be a living congnitive dissonance, or CCP just rocking their chair saying "see, they are stupid, lets just keep running this beta as a jenga game", Well you see "son" I like information on upcoming builds however I realize that CCP cannot just toss around info about things that are subject to change Lets say that tomorrow they say "Oh we are gonna add giant transforming robots" then the following week they find a problem with this and have to remove it Then the community is all POed cuz they were told they would get giant transformers And one of the reasons we arent getting dev blogs is that Shanghai team is/was on vacation i think they might have gotten off of vacation in the last few days so watch for a dev blog Anyway who gives a flying **** go outside and socialize with real people instead of obsessing over a game that isn't even released yet. And just fyi I happen to love jenga |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising
373
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 19:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
And here I thought this was supposed to be a positive thread... I was tricked!! |
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
37
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 19:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Not dense.... right.
Look, we are not asking them to feature the upcoming content on a full propaganda or plaster a website with it, we are asking for something beyond a couple of ambigous quotes, to have an idea what to expect, like back in the e3 build, at least they gave us something to chew onto. Besides that not only for next build but just information in general, how many people would like to know where does the true feedback goes to or how do they apply it, since the only current responses we get from CCP goes as follow: A) Soon.tm B) Silent as a graveyard. C) Nerfhammer to oblivion. D) "Oh yeah, about that... well maybe"
I rest my case, son. |
Utsuru Kaiju
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 20:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
I think we need more complaining. The more we complain the more likely things that are big issues will get fixed.
We need more interaction from the developers, too. |
zeek1227 zeek1227
Blitzkrieg Co.
144
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 01:28:00 -
[36] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote:Not dense.... right.
Look, we are not asking them to feature the upcoming content on a full propaganda or plaster a website with it, we are asking for something beyond a couple of ambigous quotes, to have an idea what to expect, like back in the e3 build, at least they gave us something to chew onto. Besides that not only for next build but just information in general, how many people would like to know where does the true feedback goes to or how do they apply it, since the only current responses we get from CCP goes as follow: A) Soon.tm B) Silent as a graveyard. C) Nerfhammer to oblivion. D) "Oh yeah, about that... well maybe"
I rest my case, son. Again ccp doesn't have to give you any info before release How much info do you get from bf3 or cod or halo before release other than some small concepts? you are being dense by not thinking this through
|
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
37
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 02:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
By that logic Valve should never had given information to their testers or players for that matter, when they released every new patch in dota 2 or CS, but still they did.... or are you going to argue those are bad betas for not being secretive? Dont mistake prudence with silence. Numbskull. |
zeek1227 zeek1227
Blitzkrieg Co.
144
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 04:59:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rupture Reaperson wrote:By that logic Valve should never had given information to their testers or players for that matter, when they released every new patch in dota 2 or CS, but still they did.... or are you going to argue those are bad betas for not being secretive? Dont mistake prudence with silence. Numbskull. Again you ignore any reason I never said they SHOULDNT have info Just they don't have to |
Rupture Reaperson
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
37
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 00:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
Except for that fact of what they claimed of their relationship with their playerbase, not to mention that a level of comunication on that level would ceirtainly help and improve inmensly the comunity input and also would tell the devs in a more clear way, what people want and what they dont.
But if you want CCP not backing up their claims, and a sub par betaprocess/product, more power to you...
In other words, you dont have to use shoes while walking on glass, but does it sounds like a good idea? if so, go ahead. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |