Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
I am a big fan of the game mode Skirmish. I do not like Ambush because it reminds me of "Call of Duty"(worst game ever). Lately I have noticed that people have been Skirmish as if it were Ambush. People are running past cannons, not hacking installations, etc. People that is the objective. Not to run around getting kills. You kill the enemy for several reasons in this mode, however it is not the main objective. People that do this ruin the game mode for those who enjoy Skirmish. I believe this is happening cause those who prefer Ambush, are not happy with the spawn situation. Well I am here to tell you, Ambush lovers, your play style is not welcome in Skirmish. So PTFO or GTFO!
Edit: If it doesn't apply let it fly. If this is not you don't be butt hurt over the thread. In my opinion the people that posted here against this are the people who do this.
Edit: Defending an objective and/or defending someone hacking it, is just as much PTFO as any. |
Travi Zyg
G I A N T
13
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
theres always going to be people like that. Get used to it. As for running by installations and turrets and not hacking them, if its between a turrent , supply depot, CRU or control point...believe im running by the turrets and depot. In most cases the CRU and control point will always take precedence. And usually its the CRU first. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Travi Zyg wrote:theres always going to be people like that. Get used to it. As for running by installations and turrets and not hacking them, if its between a turrent , supply depot, CRU or control point...believe im running by the turrets and depot. In most cases the CRU and control point will always take precedence. And usually its the CRU first. Agree completely with last part. CRU, Null Cannon, everything else, in that order. There are people who won't even do that though. As far as getting used to it, yeah, that won't happen. Playing a game mode with an objective, then not playing the objective, just seem like a brain dead move to me. |
KryptixX
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Skirmish is the same game mode as domination in CoD, better luck next time. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers
117
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
well couldnt another way to win skirmish is to deplete enemy clone reserves? just sayin theres been times that the scrub team im on is losing and we still win by wiping the clones of the other team... points controlled just alters the timer for you to accomplish that (not always the case and I understand the OP argument, just playin devils advocate) |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:well couldnt another way to win skirmish is to deplete enemy clone reserves? just sayin theres been times that the scrub team im on is losing and we still win by wiping the clones of the other team... points controlled just alters the timer for you to accomplish that (not always the case and I understand the OP argument, just playin devils advocate) I feel you playing devil's advocate, so I am going to play my advocate. With your point of view, we should play Skirmish like Ambush cause we could still win. You know what I am dead ass gonna try that and see how many games we win. |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
32
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
The only things I tend to hack are Null Canons and CRUs, everything else comes after.
I dont mind players who are just there to kill others, I think they help the team in a way. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
KryptixX wrote:Skirmish is the same game mode as domination in CoD, better luck next time. And yet COD players can't figure out how to cap and objective, sheesh. Shame on you. |
DEADPOOL5241
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
231
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:48:00 -
[9] - Quote
dabest2evadoit7 wrote:I am a big fan of the game mode Skirmish. I do not like Ambush because it reminds me of "Call of Duty"(worst game ever). Lately I have noticed that people have been Skirmish as if it were Ambush. People are running past cannons, not hacking installations, etc. People that is the objective. Not to run around getting kills. You kill the enemy for several reasons in this mode, however it is not the main objective. People that do this ruin the game mode for those who enjoy Skirmish. I believe this is happening cause those who prefer Ambush, are not happy with the spawn situation. Well I am here to tell you, Ambush lovers, your play style is not welcome in Skirmish. So PTFO or GTFO!
So while I'm off killing everything you could be hacking all of those and getting WP's, I guess I don't see your point.
So what if I don't hack anything (I do, im just making a point), that means you or some one else could go do it. Maybe we saw blue dots around the CRU and decided to protect you while you hack, have you even considered that?
Also when you hit the cap, ambush becomes like a second home. 20 to 25 mins of skirmish = 1500 WP but 6-9 minutes of ambush = 1500 WP so who is the real winner once you hit the SP cap. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Knight SoIaire wrote:The only things I tend to hack are Null Canons and CRUs, everything else comes after.
I dont mind players who are just there to kill others, I think they help the team in a way. I agree with this to a certain extent. If they did that while watching the back of someone who is hacking a cannon or anything else that would be great. I haven't seen it though. What I have seen is people running away from what was clearly an enemy own cannon. |
|
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:dabest2evadoit7 wrote:I am a big fan of the game mode Skirmish. I do not like Ambush because it reminds me of "Call of Duty"(worst game ever). Lately I have noticed that people have been Skirmish as if it were Ambush. People are running past cannons, not hacking installations, etc. People that is the objective. Not to run around getting kills. You kill the enemy for several reasons in this mode, however it is not the main objective. People that do this ruin the game mode for those who enjoy Skirmish. I believe this is happening cause those who prefer Ambush, are not happy with the spawn situation. Well I am here to tell you, Ambush lovers, your play style is not welcome in Skirmish. So PTFO or GTFO! So while I'm off killing everything you could be hacking all of those and getting WP's, I guess I don't see your point. So what if I don't hack anything (I do, im just making a point), that means you or some one else could go do it. Maybe we saw blue dots around the CRU and decided to protect you while you hack, have you even considered that? Also when you hit the cap, ambush becomes like a second home. 20 to 25 mins of skirmish = 1500 WP but 6-9 minutes of ambush = 1500 WP so who is the real winner once you hit the SP cap. Again, I am going by what I have seen, I can't go by what I think is going on or what I hope is going on. After you hit your cap go play Ambush, I have no problem with that. Just don't play Ambush in Skirmish, that's my argument. So you said that for what reason? |
Midas Man ll
Talon Strike Force LTD Sleepless Knights Alliance
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 15:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
This is what you will need to expect in public matches, whining on the forum wont help that. unfortunately the majority of players play for fun, play to escape real life and for the interaction. People will do what they find fun which maynot always be what you or the dev's anticipated.
For most people being told YOU MUST, YOU HAVE TOO or a similar statement turns the game from something fun to a second job.
So if people doing what they like to do annoys you to the point you're no longer having fun then maybe you should HTFU or GTFO |
Midas Man ll
Talon Strike Force LTD Sleepless Knights Alliance
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
dabest2evadoit7 wrote: Again, I am going by what I have seen, I can't go by what I think is going on or what I hope is going on. After you hit your cap go play Ambush, I have no problem with that. Just don't play Ambush in Skirmish, that's my argument. So you said that for what reason?
Win rules for Skirmish -
1) Destroy Enemy MCC 2) Deplete enemy clones
I really dont see the issue they are not breaking ccp rule, they are doing something you dont like something that may not be efficent but they are noing nothing wrong.
For professional battles see corp battles. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
Midas Man ll wrote:This is what you will need to expect in public matches, whining on the forum wont help that. unfortunately the majority of players play for fun, play to escape real life and for the interaction. People will do what they find fun which maynot always be what you or the dev's anticipated. For most people being told YOU MUST, YOU HAVE TOO or a similar statement turns the game from something fun to a second job. So if people doing what they like to do annoys you to the point you're no longer having fun then maybe you should HTFU or GTFO First off why is that anytime anyone say anything it has to be a whine? I was just making a statement. I always have fun playing this game or else why would I do it. What annoys me is ******** ass, brain dead people, who would do anything else than play the objective in an objective based game. Same problem in BF3 if not worse. If you don't want to play the objective they have other game modes and other games. Just cause it free I guess it attracts every kind of person, even the not so intelligent, as seen in this thread. |
JW v Weingarten
SyNergy Gaming
300
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
you say ptfo? going for useless installations is not really ptfo. forget about installations, cru's and objectives first. i can't stand it when i see noobs ariving at an objective and they all go for the installations, just common sense to hack spawn points first. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
Midas Man ll wrote:dabest2evadoit7 wrote: Again, I am going by what I have seen, I can't go by what I think is going on or what I hope is going on. After you hit your cap go play Ambush, I have no problem with that. Just don't play Ambush in Skirmish, that's my argument. So you said that for what reason?
Win rules for Skirmish - 1) Destroy Enemy MCC 2) Deplete enemy clones I really dont see the issue they are not breaking ccp rule, they are doing something you dont like something that may not be efficent but they are noing nothing wrong. For professional battles see corp battles. I didn't say they were breaking any rules, Did I say that? No. I am saying it is pointless to play a game with an objective and not do it. From the sound of it people are saying that "Depleting enemy clones" is also the objective. My bad, I really was under the impression that we were suppose to hack cannons and destroy the enemy MCC. So now instead I am going to just run around aimlessly killing people, for the sole purpose of stat padding.........**** outta here. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
JW v Weingarten wrote:you say ptfo? going for useless installations is not really ptfo. forget about installations, cru's and objectives first. i can't stand it when i see noobs ariving at an objective and they all go for the installations, just common sense to hack spawn points first. Did you read the thread? Really? I agreed in the importance of order in which things are taken. Again it is the fact that nothing is being taken. I have seen it. Also if it doesn't apply let it fly. |
DEADPOOL5241
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
231
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
dabest2evadoit7 wrote:JW v Weingarten wrote:you say ptfo? going for useless installations is not really ptfo. forget about installations, cru's and objectives first. i can't stand it when i see noobs ariving at an objective and they all go for the installations, just common sense to hack spawn points first. Did you read the thread? Really? I agreed in the importance of order in which things are taken. Again it is the fact that nothing is being taken. I have seen it. Also if it doesn't apply let it fly.
Maybe you just played with a bunch of other blueberry noobs like yourself and they did not know any better.
Maybe you should stop worrying about others playing the game and just go play it.
QQ less and Bang Bang more... |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:dabest2evadoit7 wrote:JW v Weingarten wrote:you say ptfo? going for useless installations is not really ptfo. forget about installations, cru's and objectives first. i can't stand it when i see noobs ariving at an objective and they all go for the installations, just common sense to hack spawn points first. Did you read the thread? Really? I agreed in the importance of order in which things are taken. Again it is the fact that nothing is being taken. I have seen it. Also if it doesn't apply let it fly. Maybe you just played with a bunch of other blueberry noobs like yourself and they did not know any better. Maybe you should stop worrying about others playing the game and just go play it. QQ less and Bang Bang more... Yeah just play a team based game and not worry about what my team is doing. Where do they find these guys? Smh. |
DEADPOOL5241
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
231
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:38:00 -
[20] - Quote
dabest2evadoit7 wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:dabest2evadoit7 wrote:JW v Weingarten wrote:you say ptfo? going for useless installations is not really ptfo. forget about installations, cru's and objectives first. i can't stand it when i see noobs arriving at an objective and they all go for the installations, just common sense to hack spawn points first. Did you read the thread? Really? I agreed in the importance of order in which things are taken. Again it is the fact that nothing is being taken. I have seen it. Also if it doesn't apply let it fly. Maybe you just played with a bunch of other blueberry noobs like yourself and they did not know any better. Maybe you should stop worrying about others playing the game and just go play it. QQ less and Bang Bang more... Yeah just play a team based game and not worry about what my team is doing. Where do they find these guys? Smh.
Yes, that is actually what you do. If I or any one of us gets into a skirmish and we don't hack, (vets actually hack) then its for a good reason. But most of the time its new players like yourself that don't hack or know what to do. But you decided to go to the forums and rant about ambush being like COD, then lambasted players for not hacking an ammo supply, turret or CRU.
When did you start playing my game for me or anyone else?
This comment has been edited by a moderator because it is in breach of the rules of conduct of this community. |
|
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
DEADPOOL5241 wrote:dabest2evadoit7 wrote:DEADPOOL5241 wrote:dabest2evadoit7 wrote:JW v Weingarten wrote:you say ptfo? going for useless installations is not really ptfo. forget about installations, cru's and objectives first. i can't stand it when i see noobs arriving at an objective and they all go for the installations, just common sense to hack spawn points first. Did you read the thread? Really? I agreed in the importance of order in which things are taken. Again it is the fact that nothing is being taken. I have seen it. Also if it doesn't apply let it fly. Maybe you just played with a bunch of other blueberry noobs like yourself and they did not know any better. Maybe you should stop worrying about others playing the game and just go play it. QQ less and Bang Bang more... Yeah just play a team based game and not worry about what my team is doing. Where do they find these guys? Smh. Yes, that is actually what you do. If I or any one of us gets into a skirmish and we don't hack, (vets actually hack) then its for a good reason. But most of the time its new players like yourself that don't hack or know what to do. But you decided to go to the forums and rant about ambush being like COD, then lambasted players for not hacking an ammo supply, turret or CRU. When did you start playing my game for me or anyone else? This comment has been edited by a moderator because it is in breach of the rules of conduct of this community. . This comment has been edited by a moderator because it is in breach of the rules of conduct of this community. |
James Thraxton
The Exemplars
73
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 17:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
and the trolling begins, started by an imperfect, of course. . . don't name drop unless you're actually going to back it up by being as good as the rest of the imps. . . ask your corp mates on how to spew hate properly |
ImperfectFan514
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
51
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 17:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
dabest2evadoit7 wrote:I am a big fan of the game mode Skirmish. I do not like Ambush because it reminds me of "Call of Duty"(worst game ever). Lately I have noticed that people have been Skirmish as if it were Ambush. People are running past cannons, not hacking installations, etc. People that is the objective. Not to run around getting kills. You kill the enemy for several reasons in this mode, however it is not the main objective. People that do this ruin the game mode for those who enjoy Skirmish. I believe this is happening cause those who prefer Ambush, are not happy with the spawn situation. Well I am here to tell you, Ambush lovers, your play style is not welcome in Skirmish. So PTFO or GTFO!
Edit: If it doesn't apply let it fly. If this is not you don't be butt hurt over the thread. In my opinion the people that posted here against this are the people who do this.
Skirmish in it's current state is exactly the same as domination from COD. The common strategy is to cap a majority of the points, and leave 1 point for the enemy to spawn thus creating a "kill farm" These matches usually end with the enemy team being cloned versus waiting the duration of the match for the enemy MCC to be destroyed.
Kills are far more important in Skirmish than you think. In most circumstances when you are down in terms of MCC shields or armor it's much more easier to clone the enemy team versus trying to capture every point and destroy their MCC.
moral of the story is to kill people dude. hold OBJ's like a sissy will only get you so far. |
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
95
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 17:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
LOL Skirmish is Ambush with objectives.
Skirmish = Round Robin Ambush running from one point on the map to the other killing each other. Rinse repeat. |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
317
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 17:57:00 -
[25] - Quote
WOW OP brought his tears very quickly to this thread. Hilarious.
In reality usually when vets dont hack its because A) they know something you dont and realize they need to secure or defend an area before hacking or B) they are expecting the blue dots to hack and they are guarding the blue dots.
Your complaints are invalid sorry. I dont know how you would force a noob to hack an objective. From what your saying you probably dont think more strategically then 'GET ALL DEM JECTIVES SO WE WIN' but if your down too much it wont matter if you have all the objectives are not you will still lose because the MCCs shoot eachother too. I have need noobs hack CRUs that the imperfects were allowing the enemy to keep so that we could farm away the clones and win. Instead we lost because the newberry had no strategy in mind and didnt realize that we would lose if we didnt clone them first because despite us having all objectives we werent going to kill the MCC fast enough.
Sorry buddy from what you said you still have alot to learn about this game.....and I laugh when you bring age into it. Surprisingly enough the majority of Imperfects are actually adults. |
DEADPOOL5241
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
231
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 18:02:00 -
[26] - Quote
semperfi1999 wrote:WOW OP brought his tears very quickly to this thread. Hilarious.
In reality usually when vets don't hack its because A) they know something you don't and realize they need to secure or defend an area before hacking or B) they are expecting the blue dots to hack and they are guarding the blue dots.
Your complaints are invalid sorry. I don't know how you would force a noob to hack an objective. From what your saying you probably don't think more strategically then 'GET ALL DEM OBJECTIVES SO WE WIN' but if your down too much it wont matter if you have all the objectives are not you will still lose because the MCCs shoot each other too. I have need noobs hack CRUs that the imperfects were allowing the enemy to keep so that we could farm away the clones and win. Instead we lost because the newberry had no strategy in mind and didn't realize that we would lose if we didn't clone them first because despite us having all objectives we weren't going to kill the MCC fast enough.
Sorry buddy from what you said you still have a lot to learn about this game.....and I laugh when you bring age into it. Surprisingly enough the majority of Imperfects are actually adults.
He brings up a good point, often we will farm a CRU if its the only source available to the enemy. This seems cheap, but really if a red dot spawns in that area they are just asking to be killed. They will learn not to do that, which in a corp battle is a major lesson learned.
KCCO
|
Tregar Kerrigan
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
36
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 18:11:00 -
[27] - Quote
KryptixX wrote:Skirmish is the same game mode as domination in CoD, better luck next time. More like conquest from Battlefield. domination still has the random as **** spawns, and the points are about 10 foot away from each other. It does very much remind me of a combination of conquest, as well as hints of Titan Assault from Battlefield 2142. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 18:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
semperfi1999 wrote:WOW OP brought his tears very quickly to this thread. Hilarious.
In reality usually when vets dont hack its because A) they know something you dont and realize they need to secure or defend an area before hacking or B) they are expecting the blue dots to hack and they are guarding the blue dots.
Your complaints are invalid sorry. I dont know how you would force a noob to hack an objective. From what your saying you probably dont think more strategically then 'GET ALL DEM JECTIVES SO WE WIN' but if your down too much it wont matter if you have all the objectives are not you will still lose because the MCCs shoot eachother too. I have need noobs hack CRUs that the imperfects were allowing the enemy to keep so that we could farm away the clones and win. Instead we lost because the newberry had no strategy in mind and didnt realize that we would lose if we didnt clone them first because despite us having all objectives we werent going to kill the MCC fast enough.
Sorry buddy from what you said you still have alot to learn about this game.....and I laugh when you bring age into it. Surprisingly enough the majority of Imperfects are actually adults. Really though? Where did you come from? Anyway that is all well and good during your corp battles. That is your strategy amongst the corp. The general idea of a skirmish is to cap cannons. Since not everyone can get on the same page with lets say your strategy the best thing to do is to grab a cannon that the enemy has. CRU's, in my opinion are most dangerous when in the enemies hands. You never know what or who may come through the portal and with a bunch of randoms I prefer not to chance it. So yes that may work, what you said, in a corp. battle. Also not that you directed it toward me but for future quotes I like being called a noob. To me it says I have a life outside of Dust 514. Side note: It is really not a good look to brag about how long you been playing. I think it is better to say your just good at what you do. |
Panoscape
BurgezzE.T.F
107
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 18:24:00 -
[29] - Quote
I don't like it when blueberry's hack my red CRU. Nothin' better than camping a red CRU and mowing down reds with my HMG. Win by clone depletion I say... kill them all. |
dabest2evadoit7
Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Revenant Order
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 18:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tregar Kerrigan wrote:KryptixX wrote:Skirmish is the same game mode as domination in CoD, better luck next time. More like conquest from Battlefield. domination still has the random as **** spawns, and the points are about 10 foot away from each other. It does very much remind me of a combination of conquest, as well as hints of Titan Assault from Battlefield 2142. Thank you sir. I come from a strategical game such as Battlefield 3 and pretty much this is where I get my argument from. Control the objective control, the game. The biggest problem in BF3 is also the same here, no one defends shyt. I now see though there are not many BF3 players and maybe with good reason. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |