DUST Search - up to a maximum limit of 1000 SP

All Channels

General Discussions

up to a maximum limit of 1000 SP

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ydubbs81 RND Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising 886	Posted - 2013.01.29 15:33:00 - [31] - Quote Noc Tempre wrote: The fact that this soft cap has no variability for match length and performance at only the lowest threshold is complete fail. I'll miss skirmish :( So then play skirmish....you will still be at the forefront. Noone's forcing you to play ambush.
Wakko03 Better Hide R Die 134	Posted - 2013.01.29 16:59:00 - [32] - Quote And in 6 months to a year, will you still be OKAY with having the skill cap? This whole system reeks of a bad short term solution once again..... CCP is still keeping everyone distracted from what is important. -Bigger squad sizes -Stacking penalties actually being active -Abysmal Matchmaking -Match launching that doesn't give an instant defeat by throwing a player into an already over game. -Being cursed with No Salvage for ending a match with the most WP. -Where is that in game system that will allow me to customize a weapon so that I get a scope back on an AR? -Pilot dropsuits -Leadership Controls (which green dot is BOB, how do I know which one I want to frago, # the dots or something) -Swarm Launcher missles that can hit something other than the ground at the base of Installation (when I don't have to jump up on the hill or mountain I am standing on to do it, considering I can't even see the sniper doing the happy dance off in the enemy redline that loved shooting the idiot jumping up and down) -AV grenades that can damage the previously mentioned installations -standing next to a resupply or nano-hive that won't give you ammo or grenades, or better yet getting all your equipment when you switch to a fat suit, instead of having to switch twice. -Playing something other than TDM over and over again
Maken Tosch Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 1593	Posted - 2013.01.29 17:03:00 - [33] - Quote I do see a point here. CCP didn't make any statement as to what the new soft cap will be WITH boosters.
G Sacred Rubber Chicken Bombers 73	Posted - 2013.01.29 17:32:00 - [34] - Quote Its probably just going to be a limit of 1000 even with boosters.
Skihids Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 969	Posted - 2013.01.29 17:36:00 - [35] - Quote Noc Tempre wrote: The fact that this soft cap has no variability for match length and performance at only the lowest threshold is complete fail. I'll miss skirmish :( Remember, this is just a temporary fix until they can do a broader recoding. We can petition that the final system take varying length matches into account such that we earn a 50WP conversion per minute so a twenty minute Skirmish match and two ten minute Ambush matches both yeild the same 1000WP conversion.
General Tiberius1 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 206	Posted - 2013.01.29 17:57:00 - [36] - Quote Sontie wrote: I doubt that this downtime marked the change. Maybe tomorrow? And there is a LOT more content coming. As soon as you think you've maxed out your character, new **** will come out. CCP loves doing that "oh, you maxed out your character? congradulations! now here, new update, enjoy training for another 3 years, BWAHAHAHAAHHA!!!"
Full Metal Kitten Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation 151	Posted - 2013.01.29 18:06:00 - [37] - Quote Skihids wrote: Remember, this is just a temporary fix until they can do a broader recoding. Rollover system is in development per DEV post. Also, at it's core, DUST shares a healthy portion of EVE's DNA. CCP will iterate, experiment, and evolve the game and SP system. Your mind will be blown when massive multiplayer truly comes to fruition. Consider a day when your home planet is persistent. The possibilities are endless. You will have 99 problems, and the SP cap won't be one.
The-Kurgan Tgrad Mercs 4	Posted - 2013.01.29 18:47:00 - [38] - Quote i always envisioned SP boosters to be a boost to the speed u gain sp not the amount. higher SP cap with a booster that u can only get by paying money reeks of a pay-to-win mindset. identical SP cap with a booster but not having to spend as many hours grinding for that SP sounds much more fair, less like pay-to-win and more understandable to the scenario to which boosters were meant to be for (people who cannot play all the time, work during the week and can afford buying aurum to use for boosters and other items) people who use aurum already have an edge with aurum only items that are comparable to non aurum items, but require less SP to use. why the double buff to people using aurum? (lower skill req's + more SP per week) :S
Ten-Sidhe Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 414	Posted - 2013.01.29 19:47:00 - [39] - Quote The stacking penalty is missing not additive. Percentage bonus are multiplied not added. S0, 1001.1=1101.1=121 for two complex damage for example With stacking penalty it will be 1001.1=110(1+(.1.867))=119.537, that the game will round to 1.2 on screen. Third module has bigger penalty, and any after that don't do much at all. Right now it's 1001.1=1101.1=1211.1=132.11.1=145.311.1=159.841 for four 10% mods and weaponry skill. AR proficiency would make this 183.81715% damage. Some kind of soft soft cap would be nice, so you get fewer sp per wp as you get more in single match after the cap. Like the 514 are 1=1, next 514 are 1=2/3, next 514 are 1=4/9, next 514 are 1sp=8/27wp, ect.. Pattern goes on infinity, so if you get 5k wp in match you still get more then somebody that got 4k in single match, but it will only be a couple since by then it takes many wp for each sp, about 40wp=1sp at this point.
King Kobrah SyNergy Gaming 33	Posted - 2013.01.29 19:50:00 - [40] - Quote disregard, wrong thread.

Belzeebub Santana SVER True Blood Unclaimed. 409	Posted - 2013.01.29 20:38:00 - [41] - Quote Love how people QQ, saying they won't play skirmish now cause you can earn more SP from Ambush. What about those people who don't hit 1000 SP while doing Ambush, I see quite a few mercs not hitting that number in Ambush but they probably could in a Skirmish, also people were playing Skirmish when you got only 50 SP, with that way of thinking we should have just kept the 50 SP cap if people think skirmish is now a raw deal. Hearing some of the communities grumbling, this is the best option by far and could only imagine what option 5 would have done to the game. Funny how so many people only care for the SP so much so that they would only play one game type to keep up their grind. On the topic of is it going to be 1000 plus booster making it 1500 or if 1000 SP cap is just that, my money is on 1500 with boosters, would bet large sums of isk on this.
Rorek IronBlood ZionTCD Legacy Rising 746	Posted - 2013.01.29 20:50:00 - [42] - Quote Belzeebub Santana wrote: Love how people QQ, saying they won't play skirmish now cause you can earn more SP from Ambush. What about those people who don't hit 1000 SP while doing Ambush, I see quite a few mercs not hitting that number in Ambush but they probably could in a Skirmish, also people were playing Skirmish when you got only 50 SP, with that way of thinking we should have just kept the 50 SP cap if people think skirmish is now a raw deal. Hearing some of the communities grumbling, this is the best option by far and could only imagine what option 5 would have done to the game. Funny how so many people only care for the SP so much so that they would only play one game type to keep up their grind. On the topic of is it going to be 1000 plus booster making it 1500 or if 1000 SP cap is just that, my money is on 1500 with boosters, would bet large sums of isk on this. I have to agree. Well put, Belzeebub.
Papa Malo Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 43	Posted - 2013.01.29 21:19:00 - [43] - Quote People will still need to hit the weekly cap first, best way to do that is still in Skirmish...
Oxskull Duncarino Shadow Company HQ 165	Posted - 2013.01.29 22:59:00 - [44] - Quote The-Kurgan wrote: i always envisioned SP boosters to be a boost to the speed u gain sp not the amount. higher SP cap with a booster that u can only get by paying money reeks of a pay-to-win mindset. identical SP cap with a booster but not having to spend as many hours grinding for that SP sounds much more fair, less like pay-to-win and more understandable to the scenario to which boosters were meant to be for (people who cannot play all the time, work during the week and can afford buying aurum to use for boosters and other items) people who use aurum already have an edge with aurum only items that are comparable to non aurum items, but require less SP to use. why the double buff to people using aurum? (lower skill req's + more SP per week) :S This is the way I'd prefer to see boosters. It'd render the passive useless as they are at the moment. The active then would be used by those that don't have a massive amount of time during the week to get to the cap. The passive booster could be used to activate a temporary passive SP on an Alt character.


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.