Don't they have to be rather close to you to use grenades?

It sounds like the infantry that should be covering you tank against saboteurs is the problem, not the grenades.

Get good son.

I here there is a book that teaches these things to whiny kids like you

there AV there ment to blowup tanks. mr. zitro is like all other imps. he just wants to be a god

That's consistent with a grenade, and it has far less range than any other AV device.

The solution is screening infantry, precisely the solution used by real militaries against close quarters saboteurs.

I expect that CCP will decide that AV Grenades are working as intended.

Marauders are subject to RPS like everything else.

No. That doesn't seem broken.

Forge Gun does more DPS than Swarm Launchers, but at lower range. AV Grenades do more DPS than a Forge Gun, but at much lower range.

That's a reasonable progression, especially since someone trying to use AV Grenades against a tank moving with an infantry screen is likely to die messily before they get close.

Infantry screens are the Rock to the AV Grenade's Scissors.

Okay - let's try honesty. AV nades cost how much? Militia tanks who die to 3 cost how much?

It's a bit broken. But fixing it now seems like a horrible idea. Half my games are dominated by a blaster tank that speeds through all onslaughts to safety.

AV grenades are fine. Could you not start a nerfrenzy on grenades! It takes two to take out a militia LAV which is fine. You can throw one and finish it off with the AR whatever. Against tanks. The ones ive thrown them at it takes all three to get through thier shields on a militia one. With others i cant take shields out.

AV grenades are perfectly fine now. With the tracking.

Av nades should be buffed, it's very tedious and annoying to have to throw down a nano hive for the extra grenade to kill a militia tank.

Because we should be throwing out these antivehicle nades from up close? Sorry, I think the AV need is perfect the way it is. Still takes a good 3 or 4 Av nades to take out a fully armored vehicle and I don't see them being used against infantry effectively to call for a change.

bottom line: Tanks can be a game changer, but just as specialized infantry, Tanks are specialized. if you are expecting to be able to have 30k EHP and just sit on an objective, you are sadly mistaken. every time you pull that tank out, expect to be the center of attention. it's the risk you run when pulling out expensive equipment (same for heavy DS, proto gear ETC)

Driving a tank into CQ means you are at risk of getting AV frag spammed as it should be. If you are saying someone can solo your tank out in the open, you must be really bad at killing people who are running at your tank, or you have poor battlefield awareness.

I know who you are Zitro, I've played against and with you before back in the days when we were both codewish whores before the guns got recoil. I am saying if a tank pilot gets in a situation where they die out in the open from grenades they suck. I agree the nanohive spamming is a problem. I think a better solution is to lower the restock timer on grenades instead of nerf the damage. It takes 6-8 grenades to get through a well shielded tank, so lowering the damage on them would make them useless without a nanohive. Just fix the problem where it is caused.