May I be the first to say, I love you commander wang, down with the SP CAP!

If by full life you mean the requirement to invest most of my time working just to put food on the table and pay the rent, while not having children or even a wife, and not having many friends or the money or time to go out an do things, then I think you've just stuck your foot in your mouth. (i.e: **** off; you don't have a clue what you are talking about)

This was an incredibly ignorant statement. You've got a lot of balls to say others have made poor choices. Life doesn't always give you what you want even when you deserve it.

You assume my life choices are poor, and you defend people who claim I have a full life because I work for a living? News Flash: This just in; Working for a living is a poor life choice.

wtf Do you honestly think people can just change their circumstance so easily? Shall I just wave a magic wand and make a good woman appear--who is interested in me--and increase my yearly income to about $90000 so I can afford to have a family and buy a house?

Just fyi, only so many people can earn so much, and there isn't that much money to go around with high paid persons earning enough to provide much better quality of living for hundreds, if not thousands, or hundreds of thousands. The vast majority of global income is drawn into finite points. It is not spread around.

I work as an Electrician, and only recently started doing that. It might amount to something some day, but it certainly hasn't yet. It would cost me nearly one quarter of my income just to finance and insure a newer vehicle. Maybe a little more than. Rent is about a third.

This has nothing to do with poor life choices, and everything to do with a lack of opportunity and fiscal assets to make things happen. Even provided I didn't have any bad habits at all, I would still be moving forward under low steam. I waste some money, it is true, but I waste it because I'm attempting to at least enjoy something of this life I've been given.

Mostly good food actually, rather than eating KD which wouldn't get me through my work day anyway. I consume an average of 3-4K calories a day and I weigh in at 184 pounds at 6'1" If I didn't at least eat good food once in awhile, I'd be suffering from exhaustion most days.

I'm already suffering from exhaustion, but it has more to do with limited sleep than food I think. I also smoke; have for 25 years; terrible habit, but not so easy to quit for some as others. Also, waste of money.

I don't hesitate to admit my flaws; I never pretended otherwise. Calling people out for not having the time, and claiming working was a reward is ignorant. People work because they have to; if they didn't, they'd have the time if they wanted to invest it.

Believe it or not, someone better off than me--by a bit--and married to an equally well off spouse, raising children, will still have limited time and energy, and their life will not be so rewarding as suggested. Most people don't even have the time to invest on spending with their children, and are mostly investing it in providing for them, even when they are well off.

How is that rewarding? ..particularly when the majority of what you do more readily benefits someone else, or provides them with things you don't have yourself, and likely could not afford?

Myself for example: I have literally assisted with the install of multiple security systems, prewired and finished thousands of homes with cable, telecommunications and audio systems, security wiring, and both roughed in and installed central vacuum systems in as many or more than that. I have, as well, wired and finished electrical for as many as 40 homes and done quite a few Reno's.

That's just in the last 6 years, and I don't yet have a home of my own and couldn't possibly think of affording one.

Do you think my job is unnecessary? That I made a poor life choice?

In this context, do you think it is rewarding enough in itself, and that I should make way for those who don't have to invest their time on such things, and can sit at home on a PS3? That I am undeserving somehow, of having something to do with my spare time, when I want to, without having to suffer from the iniquity of limited SP when compared to others who have been playing as long as I have, if more than?

I don't.

@Deveshi

You are a ignorant, arrogant, selfish jerk.

Anyways, you don't know anything about the consequences of not having an SP cap, do you? I know the consequences. I was there when it all happened. Replication build (or earlier) I saw plenty of no-lifers manage to reach prototype level in as little as two weeks which was too much to see and experience to say the least. There was no point in setting up a skill tree system that's suppose to take 7 years to train when it was possible to finish most of the skill tree in a month or two.

Of course, that was allow CCP to see how prototype suits worked out in mass numbers. They got the results. Then the SP cap came which was a godsend because according to CCP our SP gains were suppose to be in equal pace to that of Eve Online players (maximum of 1SP/sec).

Great, now the minority "NO-TO-CAP" players are acting out. As if the majority should bend to their will.

I haven't read threw the entire post so forgive me if its been said,

Was thinking about how World of Warcraft(yeah shut up) did it., maybe making it so if you don't log into the game for some amount of time a you get a sp bonus for a few matches based off the time you were inactive. who ever wants to grind can, who ever doesn't can at least make up some of that gap.

Exactly.

On all my characters, I see in local channel that new players ask why is there a stupid SP cap? They are like I did decent last match, why did I get 50SP? It not just one or two people complaining, it's everybody.

Only players who want it are the self entitled players who work and do other things and think they should have exactly the same SP as player who play all day. Sounds like communism to me, we all know how that has worked out.

I felt jipped off because I'm forced to play my matches to hit my SP cap each day.

How do you think I'll feel if I know that no amount of hours I have free in a day will match the no lifers?

If this goes through, I'm changing my mind about throwing $20-$40 a month at you guys for AUR. I won't be a part of supporting such a garbage decision by paying for boosters.

This decision just shows that all you really care about is money. It's just like the monocle incident all over again. You're just looking for ways to keep people addicted to boosters, and what better way then to reward people who never leave their couch.

How you guys thought this is a good idea is actually beyond me. Worst decision out of the Beta.



Self entitled, lmfao. I'm sorry that some of us can't be slaves to a game so we can stroke our epeen for everyone to see. You shouldn't be rewarded and elevated above everyone else because you're 12 or a welfare mooch.

1 WP = 1 SP?

Dear God.

I've been in the closed beta a while but don't get to play a lot so can someone explain the 'cap' to me because I'm not sure i understand correctly what everyone is upset about.

In my opinion i say keep the SP cap .I disagree with removing it.As many more than a few problamatic senarios have been mentioned

No its not instanced. A fully decked out skilled player merely has enough health to claim he is still alive. They get an edge but can die just as easily.

Its an fps for Christs sake people died for stupider reasons. So you have to fire 1 or two more bullets. Big whoop.

The point still stands that head shots still 1 shot, OBs still one shot, grenades still one shot and lastly tanks still one shot.

Learn to aim, learn to relay hard targets to your heavy arms teammates and learn to coordinate effort.

You are far more optimistic than I am. New players will look at the cost of the skill tree, compare that to their 2-3k SP per day and opt to play PS2 instead. No new blood, no huge player base.