|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ryanki
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
29
   |
Posted - 2013.01.22 05:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Vanda-Kon wrote:
...I'm sure there are players who don't even use sights, which I think is not natural for a shooter.
Counter strike
Doom
Quake
well, pretty much everything before COD |
Ryanki
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
29
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:
Coulda fooled me lol
If you want an idea like this to pass you must give valid physical reasonings. I can't think of a single one where "aiming" causes the bullet to dig deeper into the enemy.
The higher height at which one holds the weapon causes the gravity to increase the force of impact of the bullet, or some other such doodoo :P
Vanda-Kon wrote:Saying something is mainly hip fire just because people prefer to shoot from the hip is different. Some people shoot from the hip even if an aim reward is available. I'm just saying accuracy should count for something. Even the effort to be more accurate should count.
it does, i generally tend to kill ppl faster while aiming down sights, just cuz im hitting them more often, and have a greater chance of headshots than hip fire, i can also burst fire less and have higher accuracy than at hipfire, i dont think we need INCREASED damage for aiming...since we do get an accuracy bonus |
Ryanki
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
29
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vanda-Kon wrote:
Yeah, glad to know I'm noticed around here.
The entire military industry is based around a more accurate bullet. The future will always be dedicated to that aim. Now ask yourself why.
In this game I've killed a guy shooting his foot that was poking out a crack in the wall. I'm saying he shouldn't die at the same rate if I shoot him in the chest or head.
aiming down sights DOES increase accuracy...but even in real life, simply aiming down the sights won't physically cause more damage than if a random hipfired bullet happened the strike the same area.
I still aim down sights when people are farther away, or if I can follow their movements well enough at close range, i don't think it needs to do more damage though, since i still land more bullets on them |
Ryanki
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
29
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vanda-Kon wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:I agree... but this post and your original don't match. Military wants a more accurate gun for very obvious reasons. None of it involves the bullet itself doing anything more then moving or swirling *Armor Piercers*. The gun itself delivers the force in which the bullet hurts - not the aim. You are obviously someone who would shoot from the hip no matter what. In real life, shooting from the hip would rarely kill someone with a trained eye on them. Unless you like jumping and spraying wildly. If you dont think accuracy matters, you're crazy.
i think he's more referring to the fact that you want [more damage] for aiming down sights, not the issue of accuracy |
Ryanki
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
29
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
i thought other games "reward" aiming down sights simply with greater accuracy...which this game does too i'm pretty sure
And honestly, i'm not sure if there's a head vs foot dmg ratio (i think there is because headshots tend to kill them faster, or maybe its coincidental) but regardless, the greater accuracy accompanying AS would generally increase the amount of bullets hitting them and thus, introduce more damage in a sense.
|
|
|
| |
|