|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 03:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
The problem is, is that it IS a lobby shooter.
Your actions have no impact on EvE at present.
You cannot own anything. You cannot control anything. There's no indication about how these issues will be resolved in future either.
You just respond to a contract, get in a lobby, play a technically poor FPS.
We keep reading about these features but they aren't here and have NO impact whatsoever on the core mechanics. How can people not see that the core game-play has to be spectacular first? It's a half baked proposition right now and it's getting ready to move into open beta (how far is that from actual release people?).
Why are you making excuses for the games current state based on things that may or may not be added? |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 04:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
That's why we are here. We see this potential for a shooter to take things to a new level. My point is, NONE of those features mean anything when you have a sub-standard game experience to begin with.
Why are there still GLARING technical issues, 2 days from open beta? Why has no one on the dev team addressed these concerns about frame-rate etc?
The stat-**** will not save Dust if it plays like crap. How can you not see this? |
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 04:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Do you honestly, hand on heart, believe that FPS players are going to be as forgiving? Do you honestly think that EvE integration matters a jot to people? Do seriously think that a huge number of players are going to drop Battlefield, CoD, Halo or any of those top tier games to play a game with the technical and game-play issues that Dust has.
Honestly? I'm not being facetious.
Every single person I play with (all of them fairly involved gamers who play nothing but online FPS) think Dust is a complete disaster. Read around on various gaming forums (where you can find any kind of buzz). The majority think it's a crock of ****.
|
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 04:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
I don't think you catch my drift at all.
You'll be playing with 3 or 4 hundred other guys in a years time if they don't do something with this game engine soon.
|
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 04:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
:D
Explain to me how in any way, this game (when you are in battle) is any more complex than Battlefield 3. I'm talking purely about the mechanics now (movement, shooting, animations, frame-rate).
|
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 14:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Beast Beastlington wrote::D
Explain to me how in any way, this game (when you are in battle) is any more complex than Battlefield 3. I'm talking purely about the mechanics now (movement, shooting, animations, frame-rate).
An Abrams in real life wouldn't die to a smoke grenade launcher as they do in battlefield is a wonderful start.
That's a massive load of horse-**** and you know it.
nice cop out.
|
Beast Beastlington
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
237
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 01:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Volgair wrote:Can we get back to the wild and hopeful speculation. I want to read more about peoples awful ideas on how this needs to be another half assed cookie cutter shooter.
Yeah, lets keep it running at 20 fps. Lets keep the pathetic gun noises exactly how they are. All these gameplay elements that are out of joint are not important...WE HAVE STATS!
The sycophantic wailing on this forum is pathetic. |
|
|
|