Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Tarquin Markel
The Synenose Accord Celestial Imperative
85
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 16:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
So, I've only been playing for about a day, browsing the forums, yadda yadda. So far, what I've seen is unique in certain ways (high-level customization, RPG-style skills) and very much the same in others (people very reasonably advising me to learn the maps).
The former is what I signed on for. The latter is very, very not.
I fully realize that DUST is in an early stage, so this is more about the future than the present. For now, I will be content to hone my skills and develop my character. But for that future....
I do not want "Battlefield" by another name, only with crafting and RPG elements. I do not want an even match, with "shields" and "structure" for my team's FAV functioning as a slow countdown of "points." I do not want to look on the field and see something well-worn and familiar.
I want to plan an assault on familiar, standardized structures on unfamiliar terrain. I want to plan that assault as though I were cracking Fort Knox. I want to watch the defenders setting static defenses a good five minutes before my boots hit the ground, knowing that the ideal-- wearing down their clone supplies or destroying their field command unit-- might not be achievable, but also knowing that, failing that, a few demolitions charges around the facility's reactor will produce an acceptable outcome where my client is concerned.
On the flip side, I want to lay down defensive kill zones in advance, knowing full well that the enemy only has to get through once to claim victory. I want to have real reason to grimace when orbital bombardment starts raining on a hardened position. I want to curse as I watch hostile troops solidifying their control over the complex, and to direct our team's demo expert to blow the charges we set on the main reactor ourselves, knowing that denying the invaders vital assets is more important than the facility's survival.
DUST 514 is an addition and expansion, functionally, of Eve Online, one of the most cutthroat, merciless games in existence and proud of it, a game in which a "fair fight" occurs when somebody makes a terrible mistake. The kind of matches we have been playing would work for Alliance Tournament-style organized fights, and might (MIGHT) be passable for faction warfare, but for nullsec control? Conquest of PI sites? It's hard to imagine Eve players, accustomed to hardened facilities and massive fleets, feeling comfortable leaving the fates of their holdings up to a more-or-less even fight on a battlefield everybody has memorized-- a "match" that has more in common with a sporting event than a battle.
And Eve has so much more to offer than a few terrestrial planets.
I want to watch something huge and living pass overhead in the depths of an ocean world, yell in surprise as a slaver dog drops on my face, see a teammate blasted off a walkway to plummet into the swirling, multicolored clouds below, and get sniped right through my visor by a sniper hidden in an alien forest. I want to drive a tank through a freaking plasma storm.
If that comes at the cost of having to fight the occasional battle that was over before it began, I say that's all to the good. Perhaps you can have an "arena mode," complete, at the high end, with seasons and televised viewing, for those who favor playing a sport over going to war. |
Val'herik Dorn
CrimeWave Syndicate
264
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 16:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
I cannot love you enough. If I could im sure a restraining order would be involved. Reading your post made that little part of my brain that says "BRING IT THE KITTEN ON" tingle in so many good ways that it should be criminal.
+1 to you sir +1 to yoy sir! |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation
88
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 17:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tarquin Markel wrote:So, I've only been playing for about a day, browsing the forums, yadda yadda. So far, what I've seen is unique in certain ways (high-level customization, RPG-style skills) and very much the same in others (people very reasonably advising me to learn the maps).
The former is what I signed on for. The latter is very, very not.
I fully realize that DUST is in an early stage, so this is more about the future than the present. For now, I will be content to hone my skills and develop my character. But for that future....
I do not want "Battlefield" by another name, only with crafting and RPG elements. I do not want an even match, with "shields" and "structure" for my team's FAV functioning as a slow countdown of "points." I do not want to look on the field and see something well-worn and familiar.
I want to plan an assault on familiar, standardized structures on unfamiliar terrain. I want to plan that assault as though I were cracking Fort Knox. I want to watch the defenders setting static defenses a good five minutes before my boots hit the ground, knowing that the ideal-- wearing down their clone supplies or destroying their field command unit-- might not be achievable, but also knowing that, failing that, a few demolitions charges around the facility's reactor will produce an acceptable outcome where my client is concerned.
On the flip side, I want to lay down defensive kill zones in advance, knowing full well that the enemy only has to get through once to claim victory. I want to have real reason to grimace when orbital bombardment starts raining on a hardened position. I want to curse as I watch hostile troops solidifying their control over the complex, and to direct our team's demo expert to blow the charges we set on the main reactor ourselves, knowing that denying the invaders vital assets is more important than the facility's survival.
DUST 514 is an addition and expansion, functionally, of Eve Online, one of the most cutthroat, merciless games in existence and proud of it, a game in which a "fair fight" occurs when somebody makes a terrible mistake. The kind of matches we have been playing would work for Alliance Tournament-style organized fights, and might (MIGHT) be passable for faction warfare, but for nullsec control? Conquest of PI sites? It's hard to imagine Eve players, accustomed to hardened facilities and massive fleets, feeling comfortable leaving the fates of their holdings up to a more-or-less even fight on a battlefield everybody has memorized-- a "match" that has more in common with a sporting event than a battle.
And Eve has so much more to offer than a few terrestrial planets.
I want to watch something huge and living pass overhead in the depths of an ocean world, yell in surprise as a slaver dog drops on my face, see a teammate blasted off a walkway to plummet into the swirling, multicolored clouds below, and get sniped right through my visor by a sniper hidden in an alien forest. I want to drive a tank through a freaking plasma storm.
If that comes at the cost of having to fight the occasional battle that was over before it began, I say that's all to the good. Perhaps you can have an "arena mode," complete, at the high end, with seasons and televised viewing, for those who favor playing a sport over going to war.
+ 1 fantastic , its the way I also would like it to aim at, and I do think CCP also Are going that way with Dust 514 after a wile. |
Grenwal Hiesenberg
Shadow Company HQ
226
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 17:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
You gotta crawl before you can walk, walk before you can run. They need to iron out the wrinkles in the base of the gameplay before they can bring out any major changes/additions, otherwise people will be QQing about an FPS with broken game mechanics that just feels "tacked on" to EVE. Most (not all) players are going to be PS3 patriots and are used to triple A shooter mechanics, anything less will not hold their attention for long enough to ever consider buying an Aurum pack. I do understand what you're looking for but I'm willing to wait for them to get the various bugs, kinks, quirks and glitches out before they open up a few thousand planets for us to fight over. |
SOMBRA del MUERTE
The Exemplars
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 17:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
I saw the topic line and though you were just gonna troll, but this is constructive and inspired.thanks. +1 |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
220
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 17:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
I do believe this is the way it is eventually intended to play out but this may take a while. I hope this is what the game will be because all those things you've said sound awesome. |
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
435
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 21:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
It's a fish developing its legs right now. Going to be a bit before it evolves into the Human. |
SOMBRA del MUERTE
The Exemplars
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 23:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
This^ (agreed). The scope of this game could take it past the the usual fps lifespan. And with free to play and free expansions, the real test is keeping up with player interest |
James Thraxton
The Exemplars
75
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 23:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
+1 like it, want it, hoping for a large boost within open beta and initial release timeframe |
Jackof All-Trades
Bojo's School of the Trades
79
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 23:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
OP has successfully described the reasons why we all love and play this game. +1.
And somebody find out a way to get CCP to see this thread, because they really need to take this to heart. |
|
Hunter Junko
WARRIORS 1NC
45
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 00:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jackof All-Trades wrote:OP has successfully described the reasons why we all love and play this game. +1.
And somebody find out a way to get CCP to see this thread, because they really need to take this to heart.
we do it by bumping the Kitten out of this thread, spreading the word, Trying to contact CCP throught the support email themselves. posting it on Youtube even thought that unsung hero will get a permaban |
Severus Smith
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
163
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 01:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
+1,000,000. This is perfectly written and is my, my wife's, my friends, and every person I have spoken to's dream for DUST. We don't want fair fights, we want this.
Jackof All-Trades wrote:OP has successfully described the reasons why we all love and play this game. +1.
And somebody find out a way to get CCP to see this thread, because they really need to take this to heart. It just so happens that I have the email address for Hilmar Veigar P+¬tursson (CCP's President) and that he now has an email with a link to the OP. I have spoken to him in the past and he is an amazing person. I can only hope that his, and CCP's, goals for DUST match up with what the OP's vision. Because I, and many people I know, will pay serious bank to play that game.
And before anyone asks: No, I will not share his email address.
|
Severus Smith
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
163
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 03:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bump, because the OP needs to be read. |
Hunter Junko
WARRIORS 1NC
45
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 03:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
Severus Smith wrote:Bump, because the OP needs to be read. this isnt an OP
Its a Decree, Dust 514's Mission Statement |
Jason Sera
DUST University Ivy League
18
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 04:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
This is what I thought we'd be getting in Dust 514. We're still along way off but the potential is limitless....and that's why I play and support CCP....not because the game is good now but because I believe in the New Eden universe and the incredibe things I expect to see and do there in the future. |
Godin Thekiller
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND
14
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 05:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
SOONtm, so CTFO till then see you later. |
Severus Smith
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
163
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 19:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Bump for awesomeness. |
Vaerana Myshtana
ScIdama Endless Renaissance
205
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 19:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
+1
If I understand the initial vision for Dust correctly, this might be in the works, at least for battles over actual terrain.
I fully understand the idea behind making pub match instabattles balanced, but when you are actually battling over somebody's planetary interaction (PI) installation, the defender should have an advantage- provided they actually prepare effectively.
I also recall something about procedural maps, so hopefully as they iron out the bugs in that (I've seen some changes in the buildings, but not terrain yet), we will get that "I don't know this map" feeling more and more.
|
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
55
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 20:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
+1 amazing, you're watching my dreams OP. |
KalOfTheRathi
CowTek
168
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 23:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
Vaerana Myshtana wrote:+1
If I understand the initial vision for Dust correctly, this might be in the works, at least for battles over actual terrain.
I fully understand the idea behind making pub match instabattles balanced, but when you are actually battling over somebody's planetary interaction (PI) installation, the defender should have an advantage- provided they actually prepare effectively.
I also recall something about procedural maps, so hopefully as they iron out the bugs in that (I've seen some changes in the buildings, but not terrain yet), we will get that "I don't know this map" feeling more and more. Manus Peak is getting a little freaky of late.
B and C can be surprisingly close from time to time.
Roads, sniper positions and the like don't change but the infrastructure certainly does. C is sometime below ground and others above.
The bad side of that is Defender Turret positions can be useless more times than not. Same for the Turret at C. Also some of the random building placements means entire buildings are just a waste. Nothing facing any useful direction or, my fav, no ladders going up to the platform.
|
|
KalOfTheRathi
CowTek
168
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 23:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
Great ideas. I believe that they were in the original design directions for CCP and Dust514.
I suspect that recent reactionary* hot fixes have lost more than they have gained.
Having to learn maps is terrible for me as it does tend towards no more than a common broshooterdude Game in my view.
Procedurally generated should mean you cannot learn it. You have to go in and learn it now. Fight it now. Win or lose it now.
That however is not going on now.
Who knows if it ever will? Certainly not I.
*knee jerk |
Talos Alomar
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
392
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 00:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
I'm all but sure that this is going to be unfair in the future, and that's a good thing.
Picture it now - Being completely surrounded by an enemy force that's preventing any supplies from coming in.
Every fit will have become irreplaceable and you've got nowhere to run with well supplied ground forces knocking on your door, and a fleet raining fire down on you.
I'm going to look forward to null sec. |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 01:03:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tarquin Markel wrote:So, I've only been playing for about a day, browsing the forums, yadda yadda. So far, what I've seen is unique in certain ways (high-level customization, RPG-style skills) and very much the same in others (people very reasonably advising me to learn the maps).
The former is what I signed on for. The latter is very, very not.
I fully realize that DUST is in an early stage, so this is more about the future than the present. For now, I will be content to hone my skills and develop my character. But for that future....
I do not want "Battlefield" by another name, only with crafting and RPG elements. I do not want an even match, with "shields" and "structure" for my team's FAV functioning as a slow countdown of "points." I do not want to look on the field and see something well-worn and familiar.
I want to plan an assault on familiar, standardized structures on unfamiliar terrain. I want to plan that assault as though I were cracking Fort Knox. I want to watch the defenders setting static defenses a good five minutes before my boots hit the ground, knowing that the ideal-- wearing down their clone supplies or destroying their field command unit-- might not be achievable, but also knowing that, failing that, a few demolitions charges around the facility's reactor will produce an acceptable outcome where my client is concerned.
On the flip side, I want to lay down defensive kill zones in advance, knowing full well that the enemy only has to get through once to claim victory. I want to have real reason to grimace when orbital bombardment starts raining on a hardened position. I want to curse as I watch hostile troops solidifying their control over the complex, and to direct our team's demo expert to blow the charges we set on the main reactor ourselves, knowing that denying the invaders vital assets is more important than the facility's survival.
DUST 514 is an addition and expansion, functionally, of Eve Online, one of the most cutthroat, merciless games in existence and proud of it, a game in which a "fair fight" occurs when somebody makes a terrible mistake. The kind of matches we have been playing would work for Alliance Tournament-style organized fights, and might (MIGHT) be passable for faction warfare, but for nullsec control? Conquest of PI sites? It's hard to imagine Eve players, accustomed to hardened facilities and massive fleets, feeling comfortable leaving the fates of their holdings up to a more-or-less even fight on a battlefield everybody has memorized-- a "match" that has more in common with a sporting event than a battle.
And Eve has so much more to offer than a few terrestrial planets.
I want to watch something huge and living pass overhead in the depths of an ocean world, yell in surprise as a slaver dog drops on my face, see a teammate blasted off a walkway to plummet into the swirling, multicolored clouds below, and get sniped right through my visor by a sniper hidden in an alien forest. I want to drive a tank through a freaking plasma storm.
If that comes at the cost of having to fight the occasional battle that was over before it began, I say that's all to the good. Perhaps you can have an "arena mode," complete, at the high end, with seasons and televised viewing, for those who favor playing a sport over going to war.
One it's not in early stages it's close to open beta so pretty far along,
You are playing a battle field game skirmish = conquest or didn't you notice the similar ring a roses play style.
It dosn't matter what planet your on you have 8 (i think) maps and thats what you get no matter where you are not even randomly generated maps just the same ones.
Only thing dust dose is you get to choose skills which some need to be just incorperated in to others, and you lose your stuff when you die, so it's not so unique.
Oh and the teams are still to small for these large scale epic battles that I was lead to believe I would be involved in |
CAN-I-HAVE-YOUR-STUFF
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 04:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
Tarquin Markel wrote:So, I've only been playing for about a day, browsing the forums, yadda yadda. So far, what I've seen is unique in certain ways (high-level customization, RPG-style skills) and very much the same in others (people very reasonably advising me to learn the maps).
The former is what I signed on for. The latter is very, very not.
I fully realize that DUST is in an early stage, so this is more about the future than the present. For now, I will be content to hone my skills and develop my character. But for that future....
I do not want "Battlefield" by another name, only with crafting and RPG elements. I do not want an even match, with "shields" and "structure" for my team's FAV functioning as a slow countdown of "points." I do not want to look on the field and see something well-worn and familiar.
I want to plan an assault on familiar, standardized structures on unfamiliar terrain. I want to plan that assault as though I were cracking Fort Knox. I want to watch the defenders setting static defenses a good five minutes before my boots hit the ground, knowing that the ideal-- wearing down their clone supplies or destroying their field command unit-- might not be achievable, but also knowing that, failing that, a few demolitions charges around the facility's reactor will produce an acceptable outcome where my client is concerned.
On the flip side, I want to lay down defensive kill zones in advance, knowing full well that the enemy only has to get through once to claim victory. I want to have real reason to grimace when orbital bombardment starts raining on a hardened position. I want to curse as I watch hostile troops solidifying their control over the complex, and to direct our team's demo expert to blow the charges we set on the main reactor ourselves, knowing that denying the invaders vital assets is more important than the facility's survival.
DUST 514 is an addition and expansion, functionally, of Eve Online, one of the most cutthroat, merciless games in existence and proud of it, a game in which a "fair fight" occurs when somebody makes a terrible mistake. The kind of matches we have been playing would work for Alliance Tournament-style organized fights, and might (MIGHT) be passable for faction warfare, but for nullsec control? Conquest of PI sites? It's hard to imagine Eve players, accustomed to hardened facilities and massive fleets, feeling comfortable leaving the fates of their holdings up to a more-or-less even fight on a battlefield everybody has memorized-- a "match" that has more in common with a sporting event than a battle.
And Eve has so much more to offer than a few terrestrial planets.
I want to watch something huge and living pass overhead in the depths of an ocean world, yell in surprise as a slaver dog drops on my face, see a teammate blasted off a walkway to plummet into the swirling, multicolored clouds below, and get sniped right through my visor by a sniper hidden in an alien forest. I want to drive a tank through a freaking plasma storm.
If that comes at the cost of having to fight the occasional battle that was over before it began, I say that's all to the good. Perhaps you can have an "arena mode," complete, at the high end, with seasons and televised viewing, for those who favor playing a sport over going to war.
If I could give you a +10 I would...
|
|
CCP Praetorian
C C P C C P Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 02:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Thank you for the excellent feedback.
What you describe is very close to our vision, and we are building towards this, step by step, and this kind of feedback is extremely encouraging so please keep it coming. We will be adding new features and mechanics during the coming months in preparation for this.
It will of course take us a while to realize the full vision and as you know, we are very committed to hardening the core shooter and persistent system aspects of the game before we introduce the more sandbox style in-match gameplay.
|
|
Breakin Stuff
Immobile Infantry
680
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 03:12:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tarquin Markel wrote:PURE, CONCENTRATED AWESOME
Excellent feedback, excellent vision. I regret that I didn't read the whole effing thing earlier. +1 isn't nearly enough |
RolyatDerTeufel
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
1648
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 03:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Vaerana Myshtana wrote:+1
If I understand the initial vision for Dust correctly, this might be in the works, at least for battles over actual terrain.
I fully understand the idea behind making pub match instabattles balanced, but when you are actually battling over somebody's planetary interaction (PI) installation, the defender should have an advantage- provided they actually prepare effectively.
I also recall something about procedural maps, so hopefully as they iron out the bugs in that (I've seen some changes in the buildings, but not terrain yet), we will get that "I don't know this map" feeling more and more. Manus Peak is getting a little freaky of late. B and C can be surprisingly close from time to time. Roads, sniper positions and the like don't change but the infrastructure certainly does. C is sometime below ground and others above. The bad side of that is Defender Turret positions can be useless more times than not. Same for the Turret at C. Also some of the random building placements means entire buildings are just a waste. Nothing facing any useful direction or, my fav, no ladders going up to the platform.
best Is when all the interesting new builds are in the red zone instead of where we can have battles over the different cover zones and areas each commander could manipulate in their own ways. |
NORIC verIV
DUST University Ivy League
34
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 04:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
If the above vision happens, CCP better expect Dust 514 to break Eve online's record for users online 24/7! |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 05:40:00 -
[29] - Quote
CCP Praetorian wrote:Thank you for the excellent feedback.
What you describe is very close to our vision, and we are building towards this, step by step, and this kind of feedback is extremely encouraging so please keep it coming. We will be adding new features and mechanics during the coming months in preparation for this.
It will of course take us a while to realize the full vision and as you know, we are very committed to hardening the core shooter and persistent system aspects of the game before we introduce the more sandbox style in-match gameplay.
CCP Praetorian. Your words were so beautiful i cried.
OP, +1. That is why i'm here - to do what i can to make sure DUST is New Eden, and that CCP's vision does not get sacrificed to some pathetic god of the mundane.
|
shade emry3
Conspiratus Immortalis
18
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 10:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tarquin Markel wrote:So, I've only been playing for about a day, browsing the forums, yadda yadda. So far, what I've seen is unique in certain ways (high-level customization, RPG-style skills) and very much the same in others (people very reasonably advising me to learn the maps).
The former is what I signed on for. The latter is very, very not.
I fully realize that DUST is in an early stage, so this is more about the future than the present. For now, I will be content to hone my skills and develop my character. But for that future....
I do not want "Battlefield" by another name, only with crafting and RPG elements. I do not want an even match, with "shields" and "structure" for my team's FAV functioning as a slow countdown of "points." I do not want to look on the field and see something well-worn and familiar.
I want to plan an assault on familiar, standardized structures on unfamiliar terrain. I want to plan that assault as though I were cracking Fort Knox. I want to watch the defenders setting static defenses a good five minutes before my boots hit the ground, knowing that the ideal-- wearing down their clone supplies or destroying their field command unit-- might not be achievable, but also knowing that, failing that, a few demolitions charges around the facility's reactor will produce an acceptable outcome where my client is concerned.
On the flip side, I want to lay down defensive kill zones in advance, knowing full well that the enemy only has to get through once to claim victory. I want to have real reason to grimace when orbital bombardment starts raining on a hardened position. I want to curse as I watch hostile troops solidifying their control over the complex, and to direct our team's demo expert to blow the charges we set on the main reactor ourselves, knowing that denying the invaders vital assets is more important than the facility's survival.
DUST 514 is an addition and expansion, functionally, of Eve Online, one of the most cutthroat, merciless games in existence and proud of it, a game in which a "fair fight" occurs when somebody makes a terrible mistake. The kind of matches we have been playing would work for Alliance Tournament-style organized fights, and might (MIGHT) be passable for faction warfare, but for nullsec control? Conquest of PI sites? It's hard to imagine Eve players, accustomed to hardened facilities and massive fleets, feeling comfortable leaving the fates of their holdings up to a more-or-less even fight on a battlefield everybody has memorized-- a "match" that has more in common with a sporting event than a battle.
And Eve has so much more to offer than a few terrestrial planets.
I want to watch something huge and living pass overhead in the depths of an ocean world, yell in surprise as a slaver dog drops on my face, see a teammate blasted off a walkway to plummet into the swirling, multicolored clouds below, and get sniped right through my visor by a sniper hidden in an alien forest. I want to drive a tank through a freaking plasma storm.
If that comes at the cost of having to fight the occasional battle that was over before it began, I say that's all to the good. Perhaps you can have an "arena mode," complete, at the high end, with seasons and televised viewing, for those who favor playing a sport over going to war.
Bump for awesomeness
|
|
xp3ll3d dust
The Southern Legion
38
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 11:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
If they did all of that and updated the graphics to look like this on the PS4 https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=471672 this would be the best game in existence |
steadyhand amarr
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
338
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 12:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Best post in months we don't want fair fights I want to walk around as a god among men. And I know their are plenty of people who want to try and kill that good :-) |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:19:00 -
[33] - Quote
Nice ideology, OP. Your words are a tactical and strategic victory in one engagement of a loooong ideological war.
From a previous battle:
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=173688#post173688 |
iceyburnz
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
283
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
You just described what every reasonable player of this games wants. |
Sextus Hardcock
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
63
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:10:00 -
[35] - Quote
+1 for OP, if CCP pulls this off, it will push Eve/Dust onto the next level. |
BMSTUBBY
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
95
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 20:29:00 -
[36] - Quote
Yep!
I Just hope I live long enough to see this vision come to fruition.
Maybe my grand kids will be able to tell me how great DUST turned out. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |