|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
HECATONCHIRES GYGES
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
151
   |
Posted - 2012.12.29 02:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:I dont know how many times I have to say it before you people will realize it, and no matter how much you ignore it wont change the fact that the current SP cap is a weekly cap of around 300k without passive SP or any sort of boosters. I dont know where 500k came from, but it is either a misconception or was changed after Chromosome.
False
You are wrong and this is a garbage thread. |
HECATONCHIRES GYGES
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
151
|
Posted - 2012.12.29 03:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:I dont know how many times I have to say it before you people will realize it, and no matter how much you ignore it wont change the fact that the current SP cap is a weekly cap of around 300k without passive SP or any sort of boosters. I dont know where 500k came from, but it is either a misconception or was changed after Chromosome. False You are wrong and this is a garbage thread. Like I said, you can try to ignore it and you can try to claim it as false all you want but it is fact. Go on an alt with no passive SP active on it and no boosters, write down your starting SP, write down your SP when youre consisitently hitting 500 or less SP a match, and then tell me the differance. I gaurantee you it is around 300k SP. If you grind to 0 SP (has anyone actually done this?) you MIGHT (incredibly low odds) hit 400k, but I seriously doubt it. I have ...matter of fact I wrote down every match that I played since WED.....every, single, match. Sp rewarded,ISK payout, KDR,1-16,WP also team win or loss.I would run a thread with all that info typed into it because I wrote it down in a note book.But I dont think the community would be interested in it.It would also take a while..but alas I have confirmed,because of my own curiosity.....you are wrong. |
HECATONCHIRES GYGES
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
151
|
Posted - 2012.12.29 03:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:I dont know how many times I have to say it before you people will realize it, and no matter how much you ignore it wont change the fact that the current SP cap is a weekly cap of around 300k without passive SP or any sort of boosters. I dont know where 500k came from, but it is either a misconception or was changed after Chromosome. False You are wrong and this is a garbage thread. Like I said, you can try to ignore it and you can try to claim it as false all you want but it is fact. Go on an alt with no passive SP active on it and no boosters, write down your starting SP, write down your SP when youre consisitently hitting 500 or less SP a match, and then tell me the differance. I gaurantee you it is around 300k SP. If you grind to 0 SP (has anyone actually done this?) you MIGHT (incredibly low odds) hit 400k, but I seriously doubt it. I have ...matter of fact I wrote down every match as the sp rewarded....every single match sp rewarded,ISK payout, KDR,1-16,WP also team win or loss.I would run a thread with all that info typed into it because I wrote it down in a note book.But I dont think the community would be interested in it.It would also take a while..but alas I have confirmed,because of my own curiosity.....you are wrong. You wont post it because you have not in fact done this. You are simply trying to discredit what I am saying (for what reason I have no clue) and refuse to admit you are wrong.
Even if i did you still wouldnt believe me...in your paranoid mind you would believe that the list of after match results were a fabrication...so I couldnt really "prove it to you anyways.........I tell you what.Look me up in game next WED after the reset and write down MY SP and watch me break 300k in the first 2 days....
Like I said before this is a garbage thread and I cant believe that YOU are in Beta Max.....Jenza must be going for Quanity not Quality. |
|
|
| |
|