|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
I find this thread to be far beyond the point in which most of the people playing this game would like to think. I on the other hand will debate your points and the statements of others.
Yes this game sexualizes women, but it does the same thing to men. The argument of the game is, we are using genetically enhanced men and women. You have to think of this universe as a spartan world, in which anyone at birth that seemed week was cast from a mountain to their death as an infant. This is the universe that you play in. So for men to be designed the way they are makes sense they must be strong and alpha, they are beyond fit and probably taking muscular enhancers. So the way they are designed makes sense. You may not like it, but it is CCP's universe that they have created, set into motion, and made the vastly large and differentiating back ground stories. From slavery to an over zealous religious worlds. These are worlds made by people with their own views and beliefs but by no means does that mean if you are uncomfortable here should you play this game.
Now as far as women go it sits almost in the same place. These are clones that are created in the same manner. So yes their parts will be overly defined in the same manner as the men are. They also enhanced as well. When you enhance a woman to make them stronger they usually take on a masculine aspect , one that most women would not like to be portrayed as. So in a sense CCP has tried to find a middle ground in which fits their own story and fits the personal views of the women who would like to play this game. Yes I am aware that not all women would like to be portrayed in this manner. But women have breast and as the world goes they are not getting any smaller, and if you increase hormones into a women's body these parts get larger by nature. Again these hormones are used in this world for women and men so they are going to have large breast. Now the sway cannot be defined by any back ground info of the game, but I would like you to take a survey and see which women want to walk like a man and which ones would like to have swagger. The boots are more than likely there also because CCP is trying to make the women happy in this game. I also feel that is is overdone and the military does not issue different boots to women than they do men. But given the statement earlier about armor they might want to look into armor that is more designed for women's body style. Which in turn might give them a more female look. That is to be determined.
As for you fight against the way we are portrayed, you might want to center it on both male and females because we are both stereotyped on this game. Men just have a logical and proven reason for looking and walking the way we do. Yet the way women walk and are their boots has more to do with the way they want to see themselves and the way society would like them to look. Their armor and their physic has logical and proven reasons for looking the way they do. The truth of the matter is if this is how a woman wants to look it is none of you business how they look as long as they are respectable in a public manner then it should not matter to you.
I as a person am very liberal and how you choose to act or portray yourself in a private setting is your own choice. I also feel that there is an amount of respect that should be put out for yourself and those around you when you are in public, given the setting in which you are in. My wife, mother, sister, and many of my female friends are very sexual and have a crude and no holds bar verbal personality. It is no way my right to tell them this is wrong and that they should not act or be this way as long as they hold a respectable manner when one is in the situation that this should be done.
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:So. From what I understand this is the majority of the issues, simplified:
Men don't have inflated breast plates that show off, and protect, their imaginary tig-ol-bitties.
Women have these things for their tig-ol-bitties. Making them over-sexualized.
Men don't "sway" with the way that they walk. It's just "asexual". (Which I find total BS because they swing their shoulders which SHOULD have the same damn complaints if you want to cry about swaying in the women. Because not all men walk like that...only the "manly man")
Women do sway their hips thus making them objects of sex in our eyes. Not all women walk like that except the "womenly women"
Solutions:
1. None. Unless you just keep the curve bodies for women and allow for them, no matter the size, to have flat chest plates. That or have customization but oh wait. We're in a beta and I doubt that would even be a focus until it's about to be put out.
2. Simply just find a manner in which all characters walk. No shoulder swinging, no hip swinging, just walking.
Never expected Dust to get the "hyper-sexualization" stick because I mean really...wtf focuses on the women models, who are fully clothed and shaped according to their roles by the way (e.g. heavy), while we're fighting a battle?
I never thought "wow that's pretty hot". Actually I've thought "Oh wow. That's a female...nice ass." And kept going. >_> You can say that "hyper-sexualization" but P sure women could say the same thing about the men models and they wouldn't have an issue.
Hyper-sexualization is when you have things GROSSLY sexualized. I'm talking half naked, unfair representation (Being honestly it's fairly "unfair" representation with the manly men and womenly women), and extra sexy movement (which has been proven to not actually be stimulating enough for men to be able to tell them apart).
Of course. The only thing that's holding this back is customization. I'll agree that we're limited but DO NOT KITTEN SAY THIS GAME IS OVER-SEXUALIZED WHEN A MAJORITY OF PLAYERS CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MODELS MOST OF THE TIME.
Crack is wack, and smoke is a joke. Get good and adapt or die.
I agree this game is no where near over sexualized. Most of us have played games or watched cartoons or anime in which men and women are done in this manner. This is more actually on the very low end of the spectrum.
Yes customization would be awesome, but it will more than likely not happen. Given that this is not that kind of game.
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gunna Matic wrote:Everyone should just shut the hell up this is an unnecessary thread, OP should be glad CCP even bothered to put female models in the game because its not like it actually improved the game and no the models don't look stupid they look like females in amour which obviously looks strange as in real life women don't even fight on the front lines because they are the weaker sex whether you like it or not and if the female models didn't look like females what would be the point in putting them in the game anyway ??
This whole statement is true I hate to agree with women being the weaker sex, but in our world if you put an equal woman to a man in a physical perfect situation the man is going to do better bottom line. We as men are designed to be physically better than are female counter parts. It is how we are made.
On the other hand this is a game and the balance in physicalities between men and women are completely in the hands of CCP and their own writing not our worlds logic or beliefs. This is their world and they can make it how they like it. We are just playing in it. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Overall I don't think this is an issue at all considering that the men and women in the media are complicit with the whole thing. Think about it. Why do women act the way they act in soap operas? Why do women dress and pose the way they do in magazines? Why do women cosplay (sexually) the way they do in gaming and anime conventions? I have seen plenty of women do that in conventions. A friend of mine told me he saw a hot girl dressed in nothing more than a special kind of body latex paint to cosplay as an anime character. And I was thinking to myself... "wow, I never expected to see so many women who are willfully complicit with the whole concept of how the ideal woman would look like".
I see the same thing with men who in Men's Health Magazine, People Magazine, Time Magazine, films, TV shows, etc. in which men are complicit with the concept of how the ideal man would look like.
None of these willing participants were forced into doing what they do. They do it because they find that they are good at it or it makes them money or brings them fame.
This is why I don't see the sexualization of men and women as an issue anymore because everyone is in on it. What's the point of going to church to confess your sins if you have nothing to confess?
Just because everyone is in on it does not make it right. Look at the holocaust(yes I know this is very extreme comparison but it fits the situation) it was a thing that ****** made most in his world of allegiance believe was okay and they were all in on it. This still does not make it right. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:In terms of how we are genetically born and evolved in real life, I agree that women are technically weaker than men. Women do have the option of building themselves up body wise through rigorous exercise and hormone treatments. But those efforts hardly change anything in the woman's genes unless...
1. Every man wants to start doing it with muscular women like Spartans did. Keep in mind that Spartan women were raised to be equally tough as well. It was believed that only a Spartan woman can give birth to REAL men. That's how tough Spartan women were.
or
2. Scientists figure out how to manipulate the genes of a women to make them equally strong as men while still retaining their beauty (maybe in 500 years).
That is why I stated it is CCP's world and that they can make it how they want it. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
iceyburnz wrote:Kazeno Rannaa wrote:SO, Does anyone find this strange? Mildly sexist? No because its a fictional game, depicting fictional, athlete ised , idealised versions of human beings. Action movie humans if you will. Nobody expects you to look like that. I mean this is the nicest possible way: If you genuinely think this is an issue with Dust 514, I suggest you stop playing Dust and re-prioritise. There are much bigger fish to fry in the endless sex war debate. For example; the portrayal of women in glossy magazines, soap operas and advertising. While I'm sure you eager to flex you new found analytical muscles, and it must be nice and empowering for you, a beta forum for a game is a terrible place to conduct a qualitative study on gender perceptions. Its not empirical, and you just come across is one of those tools who did a 101 class in first year who pretend to be an authority on -insert social science here- on the internet. Its not impressive, and smacks of the worst kind of academic arrogance.
Well put point. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 00:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:I find this thread to be far beyond the point in which most of the people playing this game would like to think. I on the other hand will debate your points and the statements of others.
Yes this game sexualizes women, but it does the same thing to men. The argument of the game is, we are using genetically enhanced men and women. You have to think of this universe as a spartan world, in which anyone at birth that seemed week was cast from a mountain to their death as an infant. This is the universe that you play in. So for men to be designed the way they are makes sense they must be strong and alpha, they are beyond fit and probably taking muscular enhancers. So the way they are designed makes sense. You may not like it, but it is CCP's universe that they have created, set into motion, and made the vastly large and differentiating back ground stories. From slavery to an over zealous religious worlds. These are worlds made by people with their own views and beliefs but by no means does that mean if you are uncomfortable here should you play this game.
Now as far as women go it sits almost in the same place. These are clones that are created in the same manner. So yes their parts will be overly defined in the same manner as the men are. They also enhanced as well. When you enhance a woman to make them stronger they usually take on a masculine aspect , one that most women would not like to be portrayed as. So in a sense CCP has tried to find a middle ground in which fits their own story and fits the personal views of the women who would like to play this game. Yes I am aware that not all women would like to be portrayed in this manner. But women have breast and as the world goes they are not getting any smaller, and if you increase hormones into a women's body these parts get larger by nature. Again these hormones are used in this world for women and men so they are going to have large breast. Now the sway cannot be defined by any back ground info of the game, but I would like you to take a survey and see which women want to walk like a man and which ones would like to have swagger. The boots are more than likely there also because CCP is trying to make the women happy in this game. I also feel that is is overdone and the military does not issue different boots to women than they do men. But given the statement earlier about armor they might want to look into armor that is more designed for women's body style. Which in turn might give them a more female look. That is to be determined.
As for you fight against the way we are portrayed, you might want to center it on both male and females because we are both stereotyped on this game. Men just have a logical and proven reason for looking and walking the way we do. Yet the way women walk and are their boots has more to do with the way they want to see themselves and the way society would like them to look. Their armor and their physic has logical and proven reasons for looking the way they do. The truth of the matter is if this is how a woman wants to look it is none of you business how they look as long as they are respectable in a public manner then it should not matter to you.
I as a person am very liberal and how you choose to act or portray yourself in a private setting is your own choice. I also feel that there is an amount of respect that should be put out for yourself and those around you when you are in public, given the setting in which you are in. My wife, mother, sister, and many of my female friends are very sexual and have a crude and no holds bar verbal personality. It is no way my right to tell them this is wrong and that they should not act or be this way as long as they hold a respectable manner when one is in the situation that this should be done.
The argument that "this is what the perfect woman looks like" is both the most common, and the most sexist I've seen in this thread. It is made all the worse for the fact that most of the folk who use it don't realise just how bad it is.
You have mistaken my comment on perfection as one of looks. My perfection model was one based on the ability to do the job of a merc. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 00:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:You should complain how the men are tall and well built, with an even and powerful frame.
It's wrong to want "perfection" in "perfect" combat clones, am I right? Male "perfection" is good for combat, while "perfection" for females is completely irrelevant for combat. Having nice boobs and walking in a sexy manner in no way helps you in combat. Look at athletic females in the Olympics; that is the kind of "perfection" needed for combat, not "look how hot she is" perfection. I don't understand how someone can come up with such a crappy argument and not see the flaws.
I agree with the two different types of perfection, but on the contrary there are many men out there that feel that physical perfection is the form of visual perfection as well. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 15:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:
You have mistaken my comment on perfection as one of looks. My perfection model was one based on the ability to do the job of a merc.
You can't seriously think these are accurate representations of athletic women.
No, and I never said that they were. What i did say was when you use genetics and hormones to make an athletic woman you will have this happen as by shown through science and facts. When you increase the hormone intake of a woman then she will increase in certain areas of her body. As shown by the size of these parts in the current and up and coming generations.
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 02:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
I have come to notice that the OP and Chunky have managed to grab the trolling posts and use selective reading whenever they read someone's post that uses some tact in there comments(by this I mean they interpret what they want out of the post).
After reading and posting in this thread I went online and googled and searched pics of the Olympic women contenders. During competitions and off of the field. I have to say after doing some research that a lot of those women have good sized breast rather large butts that would look good in a gallente scout suit. Now most of them don't have large hips, do to hip size usually being the first to fall off when you get into good shape and you can't really tell how they walk from still shots. So as far as it goes out side of there walk and their shoes which could be used as women are generally shorter and they need to be as tall as the men so just pump them up a little(for games hit box sake), or just make the a little bit girly. I think CCP has done a pretty good job of capturing women as a whole in this video game where a particular type of woman is need to fill the roles that we are playing.
As stated the OP was trying to ask and confront those about the way they feel about the game, but after people started posting with some respect and some without bout how they feel he left. Chunky has come in to take over on the for front, but has managed to grab troll post and interpret what he/she wants out of people's comments and make snide comments towards that person. I have not offended you or assumed anything in your direction, but you Chunky have attacked and tried to troll/offend me twice. Both times I have come back with respectful answers to you assumptions explaining my side, and both times you have left my comments alone. I find this rather hilarious for someone looking for a debate which you clearly are by your use of words and tact. You two(OP and Chunky) have not brought anything to the table that has not already been posted in the first post by the OP. Where most people who have tried to debate you have brought mutiple, yet you do the same to them. Troll them through misinterpretation or leave their comments alone when you have nothing to return fire with.
For someone looking to debate you my friend have failed, and I hope that this thread dies along with your attempts to debate those who oppose you. I will still be here reading to see if anything new comes up on you two's side which I doubt it will.
This was not an attack on your free time I do understand the days that this thread is taking place in and that family comes first if you do have anything else to add please do it after your RL things are taking care of.
Family first it is SC's way don't believe it come read it for yourself.
Happy Holidays. Dover. |
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 14:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:NovaShadowStorm wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:NovaShadowStorm wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:
Way to miss the point entirely.
Miss the point? You're the one making to much out of it, read again, my point is clear, You're saying that Dust women are oversexualised, my point is that look around, real life, women these days dress alot more provacatively for you to call this oversexualised compared to everyday life, TV, and other games in general is a joke. I will admit though I got off topic at the end. The point, was that there is a disparity between the representations of men & women in this game. Pointing out examples of this happening elsewhere adds nothing to the conversation. The case you are making, is akin to saying we don't have to worry about problems in our own countries/homes/lives, just because those problems are worse in other countries etc. Once again I still fail to see how breasts, and a rather hip swaying walk can possibly be be that bad but somehow you'll take offense to anything it seems. So I'm done with this now, you're the one averting your eyes from the fact that due to the way women interact and dress socially does change the way the world looks at things thus looking into this game from the outside people would then with this new perspective would say compared to other things and games I've seen this isn't bad at all. Because for the last time really how much of a difference between the two suits are there? Very little, save for breasts and a hip swaying walk. Breasts are obviously necessary to depict a grown woman, and a different skeletal structure means that a different walk is also required. Once again you seem to be missing the point. These things aren't the issue. The issue is that all male suits are all painfully vanilla, ordinary athletic men. Meanwhile, the only way CCP seems capable of depicting a female equivalent is "**** & ass". It troubles Kaz, myself, and many others, that this seems to be the best the gaming industry can offer. Dust's depiction of women is not comparable to the likes of Tomb Raider, Grand Theft Auto, or Dead Or Alive. You only need look at the hassle the TR reboot got for trying to depict both a realistic & attractive woman to seenwhat the rest of the world thinks of this industry. GTA is a commentary on our own society, and our own society contains such flaws. And finally, no self-respecting male plays DOA games for the gameplay.
These female avatars are depicted rather well as women, outside of the walk which looks like either their suits are to tight or they have a stick in their butts. lol.
These women have slender frames, a basic hour glass shape, decent size breast, decent sized rears, rather thicker shoulders for your average woman(which is usually a sign of athleticism). They actually look some what athletic. At a runners/stamina stand point these women by their virtual look and my own experience as a runner look like they could smoke probably at least 85% of the people playing in this beta.
I was contemplating on this thread and games over doing women's sexual physical identities. CCP had two roads to take in the category of the female body. They could have gone the over athletic female figure which as an athlete I can tell you is a very hard body type to achieve, and most who try cannot get there just do to body style and genetics. Which is sexiest in itself because this promotes the same feelings as a Barbie. I can't look like that and I should look like that or I am not pretty.
Or they could have taken the road that they have taken the cross between athleticism and general average women. In the Gallente suit the avatars body is more noticable, but if you look she does not have a completely flat stomach she actually has a stomach that is there not in a completely wash board abs style. Good sized breast a good sized rear, but they are not over done they are on the average size. Which the women who can never achieve this shape will fill the same way as the category before.
Then they could have taken the third route which does not put women into the game at all. This again is sexist, because it promotes the thought that women are not competent enough to perform on the battle field.
So in conclusion of the choices where would you have like them to have gone with this game. Which route would you have taken. All are sexiest in there own right by your definition of over sexualizing women. I feel that CCP has taken the middle road with this everyone was not going to be happy you can't make them all happy if you try you will only go mad.
On a final note towards the game listed, I am a self respecting man and I loved DOA it is by far one of the most complicated and hardcore fighting games ever made. The combos, counters, grab, and counter grabs are so advanced and responsive that if performed by an advanced players can go on for 15 to 20 seconds before someone even deals damage. These women were oversexualized but was looked past by me and many others(not payed any attention to when you are trying not to lose)do to the complexity and the large amount of skill needed to even be good at this game. These games are still mocked and laughed at due to the way they depict women, even given how good of a game it was by women, men, and gamers alike to this day.
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:This has to be the dumbest thing ever.Any women that is famous ie movie star,singer has done something in the way of cosmetic surgery to her body.Some type of body modification,lipo suction,breast implants,no jobs ,face lifts,eye wrinkle removing.It has nothing to do with sexism at all.It has to do with what is aesthetically pleasing to the eye.For all of you who look down at CCP's scout as sexism you need to watch GI Jane again.When Demi Moore is working out.Look at her body.That is what the female form looks like when its devoted to exercise and physical conditioning.Am I wrong to find that appealing?I think not.The OP needs to get real. Weather thick,chubby,short,or tall.I love all women....BECAUSE they're effeminate and feminine.
True but Demi Moore's breast are not real. So that is not exactly what a body would look like but it is really close and spot on depending on the breast size of the woman who is in this kind of shape(And they vary we all know that).
We know what people do to be appetizing to the eye in the world of media. The problem with this is Dust should not be trying to make the women of this game sexually appetizing. They should look like they are here to do the same job as their male counter parts, with respect to the background story of Dust and EvE. Which most of the people who have posted their opinions feel that they have already achieved this.
Me included outside of that god awful walk. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:
These female avatars are depicted rather well as women, outside of the walk which looks like either their suits are to tight or they have a stick in their butts. lol.
These women have slender frames, a basic hour glass shape, decent size breast, decent sized rears, rather thicker shoulders for your average woman(which is usually a sign of athleticism). They actually look some what athletic. At a runners/stamina stand point these women by their virtual look and my own experience as a runner look like they could smoke probably at least 85% of the people playing in this beta.
I was contemplating on this thread and games over doing women's sexual physical identities. CCP had two roads to take in the category of the female body. They could have gone the over athletic female figure which as an athlete I can tell you is a very hard body type to achieve, and most who try cannot get there just do to body style and genetics. Which is sexiest in itself because this promotes the same feelings as a Barbie. I can't look like that and I should look like that or I am not pretty.
Or they could have taken the road that they have taken the cross between athleticism and general average women. In the Gallente suit the avatars body is more noticable, but if you look she does not have a completely flat stomach she actually has a stomach that is there not in a completely wash board abs style. Good sized breast a good sized rear, but they are not over done they are on the average size. Which the women who can never achieve this shape will fill the same way as the category before.
Then they could have taken the third route which does not put women into the game at all. This again is sexist, because it promotes the thought that women are not competent enough to perform on the battle field.
So in conclusion of the choices where would you have like them to have gone with this game. Which route would you have taken. All are sexiest in there own right by your definition of over sexualizing women. I feel that CCP has taken the middle road with this everyone was not going to be happy you can't make them all happy if you try you will only go mad.
On a final note towards the game listed, I am a self respecting man and I loved DOA it is by far one of the most complicated and hardcore fighting games ever made. The combos, counters, grab, and counter grabs are so advanced and responsive that if performed by an advanced players can go on for 15 to 20 seconds before someone even deals damage. These women were oversexualized but was looked past by me and many others(not payed any attention to when you are trying not to lose)do to the complexity and the large amount of skill needed to even be good at this game. These games are still mocked and laughed at due to the way they depict women, even given how good of a game it was by women, men, and gamers alike to this day.
Unless all the women in your life are regulars in Maxim, I think you need to reassess what you think is typical/average for a woman. Everything else you said doesn't even deserve a response.
Again Chunky you have misread my post and interpreted it as you would like it to be.
Yes the DOA was on a limb but I still stand by the mechanics and fighting in the game are ground breaking and to this day stand as the epitome of tactical fighting imo, yes it is crude the way women are shown in this game but it does not take away from the game play that I defended not the over sexualization of women.
My comments were that the women represented in Dust are not average women that they are average athletic women maybe even beyond average. There is beyond a difference in average women and athletic women. If you are stating that the breast size and the size of the avatars butt are beyond average for that of and athletic woman. Then you my friend might need to reassess what a women who could actually perform the way that the women in this game does would look like. Like I myself did when I went and looked at the women of the Olympics on and off the field.
You seem to think that I am okay with the over sexualization of women which by far I am completely against, and that my opinion of an average woman is wrong. I have never stated what my average woman looks like No the idiots posting in this thread are not joking they genuinely don't care. I am a father of four with only one daughter. If my daughter looked like this(which she will probably be rather close do to how athletic I require my children to be for their health)when she is grown and was to wear an outfit as of the sort then I would not be ashamed or insulted of the way she looked, but my daughter would be an average athletic woman. Which is what is being depicted in this game. Not a sexual item or an oversexualized image of one either.
Lastly why do my other comments not deserve a remark. This is insulting and makes it seem like I have not brought up a valid point. If you do not feel like they are valid please state why. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:This has to be the dumbest thing ever.Any women that is famous ie movie star,singer has done something in the way of cosmetic surgery to her body.Some type of body modification,lipo suction,breast implants,no jobs ,face lifts,eye wrinkle removing.It has nothing to do with sexism at all.It has to do with what is aesthetically pleasing to the eye.For all of you who look down at CCP's scout as sexism you need to watch GI Jane again.When Demi Moore is working out.Look at her body.That is what the female form looks like when its devoted to exercise and physical conditioning.Am I wrong to find that appealing?I think not.The OP needs to get real. Weather thick,chubby,short,or tall.I love all women....BECAUSE they're effeminate and feminine. The view you hold is exactly the problem the OP was concerned about. You've used a hollywood actress as an example of a realistic woman. As for your comments on cosmetic surgery, I'm genuinely stunned. Surely it demonstrates the opposing position to the one you expressed?
Again Chunky you have a way of not reading what is written. He is stating that it is the norm, not that it is right just that it is the norm. It is what we see everyday if you see something and tell yourself that is normal you will begin to see it(I am not saying that this is how the poster feels, I am saying this is the norm of society. Right or wrong.).
His post is stating the same thing that I have been saying the whole time that these are not average women in this game they are women of athleticism, not average women. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:17:00 -
[15] - Quote
Goat of Dover wrote:HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:This has to be the dumbest thing ever.Any women that is famous ie movie star,singer has done something in the way of cosmetic surgery to her body.Some type of body modification,lipo suction,breast implants,no jobs ,face lifts,eye wrinkle removing.It has nothing to do with sexism at all.It has to do with what is aesthetically pleasing to the eye.For all of you who look down at CCP's scout as sexism you need to watch GI Jane again.When Demi Moore is working out.Look at her body.That is what the female form looks like when its devoted to exercise and physical conditioning.Am I wrong to find that appealing?I think not.The OP needs to get real. Weather thick,chubby,short,or tall.I love all women....BECAUSE they're effeminate and feminine. True but Demi Moore's breast are not real. So that is not exactly what a body would look like but it is really close and spot on depending on the breast size of the woman who is in this kind of shape(And they vary we all know that). We know what people do to be appetizing to the eye in the world of media. The problem with this is Dust should not be trying to make the women of this game sexually appetizing. They should look like they are here to do the same job as their male counter parts, with respect to the background story of Dust and EvE. Which most of the people who have posted their opinions feel that they have already achieved this. Me included outside of that god awful walk.
The part that erks me the most Chunky is when I side with you, you still think that I am against you. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Friendly Woodsman wrote:Still surprised this thread isn't dead? Why do you want it dead in the first place? Do your problems usually go away when you ignore them? Obviously this topic hits a nerve, which kinda means we should talk about it.
And a big thank you to Chunky Munkey for a willingness to wade through the trolls!
I agree this thread will not die. Chunky and I will not let it until we have agreed, or CCP locks it. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
1CLIP 1KILL wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:I agree this thread will not die. Chunky and I will not let it until we have agreed, or CCP locks it. Goat... he's never going to agree with you.
It is not that he won't agree with me really it is that Chunky feels that what I am saying is not viable and that it is not a reason for the female avatars to look the way they do. So maybe it is he won't agree with me. lol
I agree with him on oversexuality just not in DUST514. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 22:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
tastzlike chicken wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:MItt R0mney wrote:Why does this thread exist?
...my brain... I know dude. It just doesn't die already. We've finished with the dead horse and have moved on to the cute baby seals. I let out a sigh of relief when this thread disappears from the front page, and then it reappear AGAIN. It's like forum herpes.
This thread is important. As big in the media that video games are becoming you must depict the things in you game a way for a reason or you chance lawsuits or being pushed away for what you have done. This is not something that I want for dust, it is a game that I want to enjoy for years to come.
As stated IMO DOA was the epitome of fighting games, what do you think killed. It was not the great mechanics that is for sure. It was its inability to be excepted into mature gaming due to the way it depicted women. It is still a mockery do to this, even given how great of a game it was.
Again this is not what I want for Dust, and if this thread helps for people to realize that this is not oversexualization then I will bump it to make sure this thread never leaves the Dust forums. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 23:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote:This has to be the dumbest thing ever.Any women that is famous ie movie star,singer has done something in the way of cosmetic surgery to her body.Some type of body modification,lipo suction,breast implants,no jobs ,face lifts,eye wrinkle removing.It has nothing to do with sexism at all.It has to do with what is aesthetically pleasing to the eye.For all of you who look down at CCP's scout as sexism you need to watch GI Jane again.When Demi Moore is working out.Look at her body.That is what the female form looks like when its devoted to exercise and physical conditioning.Am I wrong to find that appealing?I think not.The OP needs to get real. Weather thick,chubby,short,or tall.I love all women....BECAUSE they're effeminate and feminine. The view you hold is exactly the problem the OP was concerned about. You've used a hollywood actress as an example of a realistic woman. As for your comments on cosmetic surgery, I'm genuinely stunned. Surely it demonstrates the opposing position to the one you expressed? Again Chunky you have a way of not reading what is written. He is stating that it is the norm, not that it is right just that it is the norm. It is what we see everyday if you see something and tell yourself that is normal you will begin to see it(I am not saying that this is how the poster feels, I am saying this is the norm of society. Right or wrong.). His post is stating the same thing that I have been saying the whole time that these are not average women in this game they are women of athleticism, not average women. The issue is that they, and you, think that is the norm. This is what I was talking about when I said people sincerely don't see anything wrong with they way they think about these issues. Demi Moore is not the average woman. The female scout does not look like an athlete. Finding some olympic athletes that do look like this isn't a valid argument. I've pointed this out more than twice now, and you're still accusing me of missing the point. It gradually sounds more & more like projection.
You will have to forgive me I am not the most educated person and I am not exactly sure what you mean by projection, but I think I get what you are saying.
In the post I state that it is the norm of society not my own or the posters. I have a severely strong athletic background and will sit here and state that 80% of the women that I knew in school that were of the same cliche as me for sports and see in the gym that are of athletic build are for the most part in this shape maybe not exactly(some wider some thinner some taller some with smaller breast some with larger breast some with smaller rears some with larger). I still feel that this is a very well made depiction of a athletic woman in really good shape for the situation(again outside of the walk). This avatar looks nothing like a barbie her stomach is larger, her legs thicker, shoulders wider, and has again a more muscular build than barbie.
I hate barbie and wish my wife and I did not get her them and I don't want to anymore given the awkwardly proportioned options that don't look like hookers.
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 23:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:If the men looked like classical Greek statues, this forum thread wouldn't be about sexism, it would just be about silly character models. .
Classical greek male statue look like they are in pretty good shape if you ask me.
Edit: sorry link did not work but go ahead and look up some classical Greek statues of men. |
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 23:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:If the men looked like classical Greek statues, this forum thread wouldn't be about sexism, it would just be about silly character models. . Classical greek male statue look like they are in pretty good shape if you ask me. Edit: sorry link did not work but go ahead and look up some classical Greek statues of men. That's my point: if we were looking at potential underwear models of either gender nobody would have a problem. At least not a sexism problem.
but she is not posing for any advertising. She is not posing at all, unless you take it that way which is your own prerogative. Also Greek statues don't look silly outside of missing appendages, they look athletic and like fit people. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 00:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
Okay so I have a quick question does it make us people who don't care about sexualism or people that are mature enough to look past a female body since we never noticed before this thread.
Because to me it was just a woman not the perfect woman, not the best athlete, not a sex idol. Just an avatar for me to shoot at that represented the enemy or someone on my team to protect, rep, revive, and play with. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 00:14:00 -
[23] - Quote
Elijah Sol' Dzusaki wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:As stated IMO DOA was the epitome of fighting games, what do you think killed. wasn't it the boob physics that got that series popular?
Maybe for pubescent teenagers yes. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 00:16:00 -
[24] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:If the men looked like classical Greek statues, this forum thread wouldn't be about sexism, it would just be about silly character models. . Classical greek male statue look like they are in pretty good shape if you ask me. Edit: sorry link did not work but go ahead and look up some classical Greek statues of men. That's my point: if we were looking at potential underwear models of either gender nobody would have a problem. At least not a sexism problem. but she is not posing for any advertising. She is not posing at all, unless you take it that way which is your own prerogative. Also Greek statues don't look silly outside of missing appendages, they look athletic and like fit people. I'm not sure how that matters. I'm not saying Greek statues are silly, just that if the mercs all looked like aesthetically idealised humans, that would be silly.
That is what we are idealised people for the job of being a merc. Yes the women would be aesthetically pleasing to someone who would look at it that way but like I asked in my post a sec ago. Who would? Most of the people here don't care what she looks like as long as she fits the role, because we don't see her that way we see her as a virtual image of someone that we play with not a sex model. That maybe the opinion of a man and I can't really see it from the female side, other than looking at the male avatars which does not bother me. So I guess I don't see why it would offend mature women, someone who actually saw it as what it was.
This maybe why I don't see them as oversexualized. Just because there is a woman with female features does not make them sexualized in anyway to me. I don't see them sexually, and I don't think that the majority do either. Yes they may have made smart comments about the thread, but that does not mean that they see her as a sexual being. They just felt that in a game to be as mature as the community will be this will not be an issue, because we don't see them that way. Much like the post stated earlier about Iceland not being like America, the community here will not be like the community for other video game. We will be mature people who come to play in a fake world(lol) for the sake of politics, virtual ownership for the most part, and the fun of competition. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 00:42:00 -
[25] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:Okay so I have a quick question does it make us people who don't care about sexualism or people that are mature enough to look past a female body since we never noticed before this thread.
Because to me it was just a woman not the perfect woman, not the best athlete, not a sex idol not just an avatar for me to shoot at that represented the enemy or someone on my team to protect, rep, revive, and play with. Clearly you are someone who recognises that sexism something that should be addressed. Nearly all issues of sexism stem from the public perception of women. The fact that you can look at the female mercs and not see an issue, is just one more example of that. I thought we covered this on our first exchange.
But how is that sexist if no one see it as sexy no one looks at it as a sexual image. We would not have looked at it in any other way if she had looked more idealistic to the people that feel like this oversexualized.
if I see someone in real life that I feel is over the top i would make a comment about it being wrong. Much like people have stated in earlier post in society if i see something like that. I make comment she or he should not look like that it is not respectfull to them or anyone else. I don't get where me not seeing this as disrespectful to me or anyone observing it because it is not sexy makes sexist.
I think as you stated this is all up to interpretation and each individuals thresholds of sexy. They only good news I see is for me where most of the people don't see this as sexy. Which falls to another issue of desensitivity of society. Which falls to a perception of change and a system of liberal and conservative. The conservative feel that we should feel like we used to and women should be wrapped up and covered for the world not to see them and protected from the preying eyes of the perverted man. This is wrong because it destroys a section of society by control. On the other hand you have the liberal which feels that they should be given the freedom to do as they see fit within the confounds of the law that is in charge at the time. This also cause issues because it constantly pushes limits which eventually may take us to a point where we don't care what people do as a whole.
This all is a very political/ethical thing which i think does not belong here on this forum. It is a matter of opinion, and I don't see either of ours changing. There is no right or wrong there is only a matter of opinion, this will not change things. The reason I fought so hard was because I seen what you were getting at and I did not want it to effect Dust as a whole. If CCP wants to change it then they should but they should change it because they want to, and if they do they will do it because they felt like they have offended people. Which is respectful of them and wise from a business stand point. If they don't I stand by them in the right to make their avatars as they want them to look and that they don't see it as over sexualization.
1Clip was right we will not agree we have different opinions and we have probably a lot of different stand points. That we will not agree on. You have stood by your opinion strong and fought well. I wish I could have the education to stand toe to toe with you for this debate, but it is not education that decides this it is opinion. Very well done Chunky, I still stand by my point and hope that they don't change her because I feel there is no need to. Also this is one of the few times I have not fought my point ongoing, well done.
P.S. sorry for the political rant |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 01:21:00 -
[26] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Please let this die. If you really care about this, gtfo and try putting your opinion in places that people actually look. If you think you can change anything by getting the character models in this game changed, you've got another thing coming.
We know that and everyone here knows that.
The thing is CCP didn't lock this for a reason because they wanted to see what we felt as a whole. The only problem is that we are two sided on the issue, that is why it won't die. I am arguing for the sake of Dust not the world. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 01:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I think the general opinion was stated on one of the first (if not THE FIRST) pages- -Players would rather have female characters have an athletic build -Once we get a better character creation process, this won't matter anyway
We don't need to hear everyone ranting about such a small issue.
The same can be said about all the other OP threads that go on for pages and pages. Which are generally summed up in a page or two, the only difference is this thread actually carries weight and really matters in the real world. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 21:32:00 -
[28] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Goat of Dover wrote:Logi Bro wrote:Please let this die. If you really care about this, gtfo and try putting your opinion in places that people actually look. If you think you can change anything by getting the character models in this game changed, you've got another thing coming. We know that and everyone here knows that. The thing is CCP didn't lock this for a reason because they wanted to see what we felt as a whole. The only problem is that we are two sided on the issue, that is why it won't die. I am arguing for the sake of Dust not the world. No CCP don't give a **** because its a design decision, the reason the threads open is they don't want to be accused of censorship. Personally i find this whole thread distasteful.
A distasteful thread is more than welcome to be closed by CCP at their disclosure along with one that they feel is going nowhere and is becoming just a "I know you are but what am I' thread as well. That is their right as per the NDA.
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 21:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Nobody has to see it as sexy for it to be sexualised.
For me this makes no sense if it is not taken in a sexual manner how can it be sexualized. Other than by perverting the original idea to something else. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 22:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
@ Kaz
Female avatars are not a selling point to this game and will never be so. The way they look I feel does not affect any aspect of this game in any way or the media it will recieve.
I would also like to say that through sociocultural studies we try to deny our animal urges in an attempt to be better than them.
Also to your last question. No I don't want my daughter to be thought of as something to be owned. But I am completely aware that she will have men attracted to her just because she is an able bodied woman for procreation. The same way that I am able to as a man to find a woman attractive just because she is an able body woman as well without taking in to consideration age, height weight and actual over all attractiveness. Given this I am able to not think of myself as a weird pervert because I understand myself as a human. No I do not act on these instinctual urges or feel bad for it because I have this understanding.
This does not apply to insest in that we as humans know that this can produce weakness and abnormalities in the offspring so is only brought about at truly desperate times to reproduce for the need to continue, and those who are actually sick in the head to see this as an option given the know facts and risks for the offspring. |
|
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 00:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote:Ya know what would be cool?
If they only had one model for everything, but still gave you the option of picking between male and female.
Then it'd be completely accurate.
I do believe that is how it used to be or is that what you are getting at. Forgive me I don't know how long you have been here. |
Goat of Dover
Shadow Company HQ
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 03:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:If one more person posts here, I'm closing the kitchen down.
But Icy I am still hungry. |
|
|
|