DUST Search - A great build is horrible because of this one thing!!!!

G-SLicK wrote:

Deskalkulos Ildigan wrote:

Actually Heavies are supposed to win a 1v1 match (to my knowledge), it should be the case that multiple people have to band together to take one heavy down not the other way around.
Of course there are things like maneuverability that might allow a single person to outsmart bull. .. i mean, a heavy in 1v1. But if you have an open field and a heavy on one side and 2-4 not heavies on the other side (all with equal equipment levels), then the heavy should win by mowing the group down in a matter of seconds.
Thats the most enjoyable part about encountering heavies. Distracting them without getting yourself killed, so that another player can flank him from the side / behind and deal massive damage.

About AR themself:
I have seen people playing perfectly fine without AR's. There are too many different weapon types to say "This one and single type of weapon is THE ONE TYPE of weapon the whole game is centered around"

And to be slightly trolling at the end:
You want to play "every other game?" You are free to play CoD.

Edit:
*shivering at the thought that quick scoping is THE WAY to play sniper*

well if the heavies were intended to win every 1v1 then why dont we all just play heavies? that sounds like the best way to play this game right? im sorry but i dont think they were intended to 1v1 and 1v4 by themselve thats too easy


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
fred orpaul Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 211	Posted - 2012.12.31 02:14:00 - [1] - Quote G-SLicK wrote: Deskalkulos Ildigan wrote: Actually Heavies are supposed to win a 1v1 match (to my knowledge), it should be the case that multiple people have to band together to take one heavy down not the other way around. Of course there are things like maneuverability that might allow a single person to outsmart bull. .. i mean, a heavy in 1v1. But if you have an open field and a heavy on one side and 2-4 not heavies on the other side (all with equal equipment levels), then the heavy should win by mowing the group down in a matter of seconds. Thats the most enjoyable part about encountering heavies. Distracting them without getting yourself killed, so that another player can flank him from the side / behind and deal massive damage. About AR themself: I have seen people playing perfectly fine without AR's. There are too many different weapon types to say "This one and single type of weapon is THE ONE TYPE of weapon the whole game is centered around" And to be slightly trolling at the end: You want to play "every other game?" You are free to play CoD. Edit: shivering at the thought that quick scoping is THE WAY to play sniper well if the heavies were intended to win every 1v1 then why dont we all just play heavies? that sounds like the best way to play this game right? im sorry but i dont think they were intended to 1v1 and 1v4 by themselve thats too easy becuase they would be out manuvered but shotgun scouts and laser rifles, or re scouts or by lobbing grenades at them. heavies are horribly vulnerable becuase they lack speed and range once they go some place they are commited to following thru. so yes in CQC and mid range combat they should beat 2-4 other suits depending on skill, that said should the other suits break engagement and renegage with the advantage the heavy would be done. I cant remember the number of times in the first build a heavy would roll half my team at a point, but I would take him down almost every time becuase I would fall back take higher ground grenade the ** out of him and use range to my advantage(or just swarm shotgun him). heavys are the troops that should force every one to back off, they should cuase mobs to split up and flee, instead of some ***** in a proto advance suit.