Your entire post is terrible.

1. Heavies should always beat AR users in a 1v1 fight, as long as they aren't extremely stupid. The weakness with heavies is that they don't have equipment and can't be where they're needed as quickly as other suits. Yes, they shouldn't attack a squad in win, but an AR user beating a heavy 1v1 is a joke.
2. Exactly: ARs should be a generalist weapon. However, unlike what you think, they shouldn't be perfect at everything. If you think you can get through armor faster than a MD, you're joking.
3. How exactly was this ruined? The only difference now is the sniper has a chance to kill you if you run out in the open in front of them while shooting like an idiot.
4. MDs needed a bigger clip- but perhaps only a 1 round increase. If you would use more than ARs (and by the sound of it, you used them because they were OP at the time) you would know this.

Learn to play- as I learned how to effectively use non-OP weapons last build.

What are you talking about.... aside from the bigness problem of the IS, the other main problem is that I can't see what I am hitting because of the opponents name.

Mass driver isn't really good at long range, isn't it?

G-slick you're such a beast on the field - I fear very little besides you and 2 others. Never seem to be able to kill you guys. But I think I see a problem with your thinking. CCP is a company - and your a hardcore gamer. The idea of the balance wasn't just fixing game mechanics - but a lot of what CCP is doing is developing a game that will last - thus their also trying to be attractive to gamers. And what's commonly known as unattractive to the FPS crowd is a single weapon that can do all in high end games. That was the AR - the do all weapon. Not do all because it can do everything well enough like an AR should - it did everything the best. That needed fixing pretty badly if CCP wants to advertise how depth there creative system is. A person shouldn't need to dedicate too much time learning a weapon that's only point and fire.

They only got nerfed in 1 way- recoil. 1 "nerf" was only because people whined they wanted ironsights, no matter how much they suck or how little sense it makes to have them. Not sure what that 3rd nerf you made up is.

So either vehicles or ...not in the hands of 90% of the players?

Do you want 40% of the players using MD or Sniper rifles? Would that be a fun game?

The Tac is a poor choice against laser right now.

Cover is just situational.

I finally get to see AR users whine. Hows it feel to be on the end of the nerf stick? I'm so happy I could cry.

I love the hatred and competition this game is breeding.

Last time I checked almost every single corp goes into pubs with squads. Yet they have some of the worst W/L ratios.

You must of been dropped as a baby.

Our win lose for every corp match and tourney match is: We are undefeated!!

hes just a random who gets face rolled by SI. G-slick you do remember craftyslyfox aint ya? He is the guy who is capable in taking you on 1vs1 with militia stuff while you go full proto. Scrub player is scrub player..

If my corp had a lack of a life enough to match your ISK and SP, we would.

Btw, remember all the times I killed your tac AR last build with my pistol when we ran into eachother 1v1?

I'm saying that in this game money+SP>skill. From what I've seen of you fighting and heard on the forums, you're backed up by too much ISK and SP to overshadow lack of skill.