Why bother? You will just leave out one of the best teams and then put zion TCD in 3rd for no reason what-so-ever.

You want to be taken seriously? Do real evaluations

I like Zionshad, it wasn't an attack against him or his corp. I was making a point. Do you know the matches they won/lost since then and who was invovled? The tourny was almost a month ago and a lot has changed since them. How you didn't put SyNergy in top 5 is evidence enough that you dont know what you are talking about. They were put in a group with us and that shouldn't be held against them. Do you know who they battled and won/lost to since the tourny?

Besides imperfects at the top you are just guessing at the rest. Even I couldn't give you a top 10 because we only know about who we play against and their skill/tatics. So maybe you should go back and put a big dislaimer thats says

"I made this all up and your guess is as good as mine"

To be fair about this you need to give detail or you are just guessing too. Let me save you the trouble though. Unless all the better corps fought each other best 2 out of 3 and had the isk to go all out then it doesn't matter.

I get it we all like rankings but there just isn't a point to do it without any sort of accuracy or consistancy

Pretty sure the gameplan was to leave us out and hope Nummies throws an ego tantrum right lolDusters? lol silly dusters

While having some good laughs and ur lolblog sure does give us some good laughs

LOL Beers ur wasting ur time this Blog hates us and is run by some of the ppl that truly despise me for whatever reason
Pretty sure the gameplan was to leave us out and hope Nummies throws an ego tantrum right lolDusters? lol silly dusters

The teams we played so far know how we are. If ppl rate us highly thats kool, if they rate us low thats kool as well. We dont really care what ppl think of our skill lvl we will continue to do what we do which is work hard while having some good laughs and ur lolblog sure does give us some good laughs

ur missing the point.

we used as much measurable data from the tourney as we could .

everyone is going to agree with any top 10 list. they really arent supposed to. games won/lost after the tourney are so subjective. .

no corps comes on here and says 'we just lost to _____' it just doesnt happen. and where is the proof of these horrible TCD losses btw?

we received tons of emails about the rankings but not one tried to discredit them as a bad corp. in the end they arent static ratings they change a great deal.

ur missing the point. we used as much measurable data from the tourney as we could and relied on opinions as secondary indicators becuz of bias. not ranking SI second is the kind of MAG fanboyism that needs to stop. they earned the right to be ranked #2 at this stage. not everyone is going to agree with any top 10 list. they really arent supposed to. games won/lost after the tourney are so subjective. no corps comes on here and says 'we just lost to _____' it just doesnt happen. and where is the proof of these horrible TCD losses btw? we received tons of emails about the rankings but not one tried to discredit them as a bad corp. in the end they arent static ratings they change a great deal.

we recognize the skill of the Imperfects and their #1 ranking but thats where it ends. their opinions on how to rank the bottom 9 corps means as much as anyone else.

this makes no sense as we had you ranked the #3 dust corp behind betamax and GC on the power rankings we never got to finish because the tourney started. the bottom line is u didnt perform in the tourney. if PRO had the same performance as you no one says a word if we leave them out of the top 10. all we did was leave the bias out.

imperfects 'guess' is more right than dustmerc 'guess'

ur missing the point. we used as much measurable data from the tourney as we could and relied on opinions as secondary indicators becuz of bias. not ranking SI second is the kind of MAG fanboyism that needs to stop. they earned the right to be ranked #2 at this stage. not everyone is going to agree with any top 10 list. they really arent supposed to. games won/lost after the tourney are so subjective. no corps comes on here and says 'we just lost to _____' it just doesnt happen. and where is the proof of these horrible TCD losses btw? we received tons of emails about the rankings but not one tried to discredit them as a bad corp. in the end they arent static ratings they change a great deal.

we recognize the skill of the Imperfects and their #1 ranking but thats where it ends. their opinions on how to rank the bottom 9 corps means as much as anyone else.

Firts, what i ranked isnt the imp opiinion but my own; but like beers said, SI was the 3rd best team we faced in the tourny.

Also this "data" you have is complete bull unless u post it, otherwise its just words. As my data of playing is more accurate tyen yours. Coprs have been playing before and now after the tourny yet you dont seem to make note of that; as people have joined and left corps which also should impact ranking.

So in end, your ranks are 1/2 a$$ed w/o proper intel, data and consideration on how teams actual did per game in the tourny (as only looked at win/loss), and how do in regular battles (pub/corp)

SYN

1) this isnt bruce. he isnt the only blog writer, most of us write more than him at this pt.

and being mad is dumb all i did was give my opinions. SYN has been together playing 'competitively' [ur words] longer than any of these groups. the real question is, if u are so competitive in every game u play and practice strats and teamwork [again ur words] how do u leave in the same round as zerg clans like KEQ [ur words again] thats not performing. u also were the only group to face the imperfects twice. if ur as good as u say u should have learned from the first battle. no one beat the imperfects but many people said u and pfb had the same level of players. if u did and learned anything from kz3, bf3, uc3 and all those games u actually should have been the favorite imo. u werent ranked becuz even tho we agreed KEQ had bracket luck they basically finished in a tie with u with worse players. its the same reason we rated zion over rofl house. they had a big alliance to choose from TCD only had their clan. in the end the ratings are fluid and u will have plenty of chances to move up.

Let me ask you this Reiki not Bruce... Did you or any of your "writers" play in the tournament? What "data" do you have to back up said opinions?

If the answer to the first question is none. Don't bother with the second question or corp. rankings.

Corps. that fought in the tournament are the ultimate judge of who is good and who isn't. The tournament corps. members opinions are based on facts, THEY WERE THERE and didn't get the information second hand.

1) This isnt Bruce. He isnt the only blog writer, most of us write more than him at this point. (Gawd we need more clowns like Brucey around)
2) Being mad is dumb. All I did was give my opinions. (We care )


SYN has been together playing 'competitively' [your words] longer than any of these groups. The real question is?;- If you are so competitive in every game you play and practice strategies and teamwork [again in your words];- how do you leave in the same round as zerg clans like KEQ [in your words again] that is not performing.

You also were the only group to face The Imperfects twice. If your as good as you say, you should have learned from the first battle. No one beat The Imperfects but many people said you and PFB had the same level of players. If you did and learned anything from KZ3, BF3, UC3 and all those games;- you actually should have been the favorite IMO.

You werent ranked because even though we agreed KEQ had bracket luck (WTF???) they basically finished in a tie with you with worse players. It is the same reason we rated Zion over ROFL House. They had a big alliance to choose from. TCD only had their clan. In the end the ratings are fluid and you will have plenty of chances to move up.

well if the IMP said it than it must be right ur opinion doesnt get a bonus because of ur corp tag. sorry.

Maybe you should have asked the corp that knows a bit about skilled players and tatics. Even better you could have ask in a post for corps to send in a lit of corp battles an results. Ever think of that? I mean the winners would always send in a list so in the end you can get a pretty good picture of things. Oh but thats real data and its not that important to you. Opinons of certain people is the way to go it seems.

I mean you listed corps that didn't even participate in the tournament? Do you have information of them beating corps since then that the rest of us dont have? What about the rest of the corps?

I talk to corp leaders all the time and know who plays who and the results on these matches. Its not my place to give that info out but if you made a list based on real information it would look nothing like the one you put up there.

You picked the order then bascially made up reasons to justifiy them. Nothing more.

A thread where the most logical posts are coming from one of the trolliest of clans?

A thread where the most logical posts are coming from one of the trolliest of clans? What is this world coming to????

I <3 you all, it's so nice to be able to wake up and come to the forums and find something that puts a smile on my face.

A thread where the most logical posts are coming from one of the trolliest of clans? What is this world coming to????

I <3 you all, it's so nice to be able to wake up and come to the forums and find something that puts a smile on my face.