DUST Search - new users

SoTa PoP wrote:

Char Egret wrote:

SoTa PoP wrote:

Uh, PC Gamers are hardcore, Minecraft being the first game that casual players on PC took a shine too besides WoW. DUST's success will come from the casual gamers, who are far more willing to pick up a console game then a PC game. Why? PC Games communities are elitest assholes who think in an FPS that you can't even have an opinion without a 2.0 KDR. Throw in the availability of the PS3 compared to PC, It's just easier to sit down and relax to rather then sitting down in front of my computer.

The latest statistics from netflix says PS3 is there number 1 platform for online streaming, beating out PC. This goes to show the change of mind people are having towards consoles in general, and shows CCP may be on the right track making this a console exclusive.

I think PC gamers have a harder time being casual then console ones, and graphics have nothing to do with anything.

And for the post above me -I'd rather drop $60 bucks on a new game then spend 20 to make dust fun- This is a joke statement right? You'd rather drop 60 bucks on just any other FPS then spend 20 on possibly making a character rock in an ever expansive and growing game? You sir, are a rager.

Yes im saying they are different for that reason so think about the regular ps3 gamer who trys this game. THIS IS NOT A CASUAL GAME IN ANYWAY! As far as droping $20 on a ****** looking game that takes way to much time to be casual vs a $60 solid great looking game that i can jump on play and have fun any day any time ill take it. Just a FYI IM NOT A COD FAN IN ANY WAY. I enjoy Killzone and playing Resistance fall of man 1 before cod ****** it.

But... you're wrong.
This game will *Supposedly* last for years, well beyond any 60 dollar game you pay for. By the time the servers are closed for that 60 dollar game 2 years from now, DUST will be launching surface to space game play and putting down mechanics to allow NPCs to get involved in planetary battles. Your 20 bucks today could lead you into battles and meta gaming you never of dreamed of. But instead, you bought BF4, blew up a building with 3 people in it, and got to fly in an aircraft with 30 other people at once. Then you gladly did it all over again, and again, and again.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.01 20:47:00 - [1] - Quote i just joined the beta so granted i don't have any great guns or armor but when this game launches this will affect new players who want to join after the initial launch, trying to join in right away no one will play for very long. the skill menu is confusing took me about an hour to figure it out, i know there are tutorials but i don't feel like sitting there for an hour to listen how to play. anyone playing for awhile will wreck any noob in seconds with superior fire power and armor a swell. I tried to buy some new guns and armor and the prices are so high and to buy multiple for every time a die is mind blowing. If i buy a gun i should get like 20 not just one. I know this is a beta but these issues need to be addressed soon rather then later. Oh and remove the limited number of clones for skirmish it turns it into no more then death match with people camping objectives for the kills and a easy win. plus not a bug fan of the arrows over everyone's head especially enemies makes it far to easy to find someone and makes snipping difficult give us a kill cam maybe but get rid of it. again i know this is a beta and your trying to do something new with making it free to play but right now id much rather go pay for a $60 game and have fun then waste time on this.
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 20:30:00 - [2] - Quote Well i see what your all saying but think about the market on counsole it is not the same for PC. People want to jump in and play not spend their life on game to upgrade a character. The game has terrible graphics they are awful. I know they are trying something new and i'm all for it i personally hate what cod has done to shooters. Any resistance fall of man fan would know what i'm talking about. But they have to be more generous with the market and im not going to pay real money for blue prints if playing it for free relies on spending money. if i have to drop more then $20 on this game for it to be fun the ill buy $60 game and not have to waste my time. I was extreamly excited when i got accepted to the beta i was looking up lore and into the back story. I downloaded it and was up and ready. first the graphics hit me as a piece of ****, then the death match centered game play pissed me off. the maps where i jog for 10min looking for an enemy. the lil red arrows that makes everyone visible for noob kills. and then got shat on by superior fire power i cant afford. you will have to play this game on day one or else your left in the dust. eve online must be great but that's not a shooter for one and two PC gamers and counsole players are very differnt my roommate is PC and im counsole i played WOW and im a big LOL fan now to but the style and the commitment are very different you cant expect this game to succeed with such a small nich at this rate its doomed to fail especially when there are other shooters that are more forgiving and and more fun. MAG is a great example id much rather play then this. but to be honest if killzone 4 releases before this then i wont be returning.
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 20:52:00 - [3] - Quote Just to state i do like the idea that my actions matter and that i have to play this game with my limits in mind about what kind of gear i have and if i lose i lose it to. But unless your a eve vet ummm i could really give two *** about taking my time to find what some one is running and what kind of load out they have then i have to get my team cooperate in taking down an individual. NOW STOP think about that.....get my cooperate unless your playing with friends or a clan your **. no one cooperates in any game even in LOL where the game is based on it and if they don't have mics good luck with that. I enjoy a challenge and as far as putting a kill limit on the skirmish mode i have no clue why you want that when your suppose to going for objectives vs kills like i said it invites camping. Kill-cams im not a fan but what dictates line of sight if my camera is in your general direction i can see you, your in my line of sight if you can see me unless you can see through walls. (don't argue this its physics) I enjoy the challenge but like i said im not going to pay to play if the game is free then that's how i play it same goes for LOL i don't pay unless i really want a skin. Im not going to pay for blue prints they should be accessible in game currency otherwise anyone who pays again will on others. if that's the case where i have to pay then ill get a good game like killzone. The other concern is and ill let it slide with it being a beta is the game looks like crap im playing on my ps2. reminds me of a ** version of killzone 1. I want to get into this game i really do trust me but right now there is nothing that makes me want to play. If you want to make a game where dieing really matters im all for it but make smaller maps that allow for tactical play. Metal Gear online did a great job and so did MAG. this game the cost of death is to high with little reward. Almost mandatory you play with a clan or mics which i like but good-luck finding actually players granted i come from mindset of 5th graders that play and do what they want but lil here shows me its any diffrent you will always ahve the people who will do what they want and the team over but when that means i lose items i put time into getting and get spawned killed or even a regular kill ** it.
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 20:58:00 - [4] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Uh, PC Gamers are hardcore, Minecraft being the first game that casual players on PC took a shine too besides WoW. DUST's success will come from the casual gamers, who are far more willing to pick up a console game then a PC game. Why? PC Games communities are elitest assholes who think in an FPS that you can't even have an opinion without a 2.0 KDR. Throw in the availability of the PS3 compared to PC, It's just easier to sit down and relax to rather then sitting down in front of my computer. The latest statistics from netflix says PS3 is there number 1 platform for online streaming, beating out PC. This goes to show the change of mind people are having towards consoles in general, and shows CCP may be on the right track making this a console exclusive. I think PC gamers have a harder time being casual then console ones, and graphics have nothing to do with anything. And for the post above me -I'd rather drop $60 bucks on a new game then spend 20 to make dust fun- This is a joke statement right? You'd rather drop 60 bucks on just any other FPS then spend 20 on possibly making a character rock in an ever expansive and growing game? You sir, are a rager. Yes im saying they are different for that reason so think about the regular ps3 gamer who trys this game. THIS IS NOT A CASUAL GAME IN ANYWAY! As far as droping $20 on a **** looking game that takes way to much time to be casual vs a $60 solid great looking game that i can jump on play and have fun any day any time ill take it. Just a FYI IM NOT A COD FAN IN ANY WAY. I enjoy Killzone and playing Resistance fall of man 1 before cod **** it.
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 21:15:00 - [5] - Quote Its been stated before and i think they all make a good point this game needs better tutorials and what would e nice is online missions that are co-op not pvp. Do missions or contracts that you can earn gear and in game currency with out fighting others. If this game wants to be like a rpg then make it like one. Just like in WOW not everyone is doing pvp 24/7 they do missions and such to build their character. this will allow newcomers to come in and have fun before joining the fight. But just jumping in as a wet fish where is the fun if you just wrecked when you try. Like the fact you lose everything but getting it back somewhat should not seem like a job. This is a game not an occupation. And yes other games have it where vets wreck noobs but to this scale not where is it this bad. a slightly better lmg at lvl 20 vs a assault rifle at lvl 2 your good. but armor, weapons, modules, vehicles, and everything else a vet has vs a noob at lvl 1 the odds are stacked much higher in this game then any other.
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 21:15:00 - [6] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Char Egret wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Uh, PC Gamers are hardcore, Minecraft being the first game that casual players on PC took a shine too besides WoW. DUST's success will come from the casual gamers, who are far more willing to pick up a console game then a PC game. Why? PC Games communities are elitest assholes who think in an FPS that you can't even have an opinion without a 2.0 KDR. Throw in the availability of the PS3 compared to PC, It's just easier to sit down and relax to rather then sitting down in front of my computer. The latest statistics from netflix says PS3 is there number 1 platform for online streaming, beating out PC. This goes to show the change of mind people are having towards consoles in general, and shows CCP may be on the right track making this a console exclusive. I think PC gamers have a harder time being casual then console ones, and graphics have nothing to do with anything. And for the post above me -I'd rather drop $60 bucks on a new game then spend 20 to make dust fun- This is a joke statement right? You'd rather drop 60 bucks on just any other FPS then spend 20 on possibly making a character rock in an ever expansive and growing game? You sir, are a rager. Yes im saying they are different for that reason so think about the regular ps3 gamer who trys this game. THIS IS NOT A CASUAL GAME IN ANYWAY! As far as droping $20 on a **** looking game that takes way to much time to be casual vs a $60 solid great looking game that i can jump on play and have fun any day any time ill take it. Just a FYI IM NOT A COD FAN IN ANY WAY. I enjoy Killzone and playing Resistance fall of man 1 before cod **** it. But... you're wrong. This game will Supposedly last for years, well beyond any 60 dollar game you pay for. By the time the servers are closed for that 60 dollar game 2 years from now, DUST will be launching surface to space game play and putting down mechanics to allow NPCs to get involved in planetary battles. Your 20 bucks today could lead you into battles and meta gaming you never of dreamed of. But instead, you bought BF4, blew up a building with 3 people in it, and got to fly in an aircraft with 30 other people at once. Then you gladly did it all over again, and again, and again. 2015 ps3 servers close
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 21:24:00 - [7] - Quote I hope it gets really big if you think it will go to ps4. better update the graphics and such. Cause i see this game filling a small niche in games i would love to see filled but execution so far not such much. Give me missions and contracts for co-op PvE and I can see people getting on board and even i will drop real cash on this game but as it sits you better get the most out of it till 2015 cause i dont see it being popular on ps4.
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 21:39:00 - [8] - Quote We are in a age of where people like a good looking game. I want to enjoy my experience and where visuals are 90% of how you connect to a video-game its important. Blan landscaped can ruin great game-play video-game history has shown us that. Just please don't say nintendo is amazing compared to modern games they didnt have the tech back then and everyone loves a classic. Dust is not a classic so it doesn't get a pass in the visuals department. And something you all seem to enjoy saying is that this game breaks the mold its new it great for being new i totally agree but... BUT it has to be accessible play have to be able to play it and you cant rely on only a small group to keep it alive. It costs money to keep a game up and running and they need to get people to drop real cash to keep it going not in game cash. Look at the business model you cant make it pay to play you have to make it accessible to a large market and you have to make them want to drop real cash on it. If they dont take care of these three core aspects of a free game then it will fail. I'm glad apparently there are missions and pve as the above post stated so if that's going to be in there then its all gravy baby lol
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.05 21:47:00 - [9] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Yea, looks don't count for much to me. It's nice, but the mechanic of the game is what will keep me coming back." But then again, my all time favorite games are the Romance of the Three Kingdoms ones. Graphics, non-exitant I agree I enjoy classic games and graphics aren't big for me. But look at the market and the new HD remastering of games. Dont just think about your self you need to think about others and if they will play. lol i wish they made a game just for me but i dont know how many people will buy it, that kinda thing. But i will say this GIVE ME MY FINAL FANTASY 7 HD REMAKE! lol
Char Egret Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 3	Posted - 2012.12.06 00:07:00 - [10] - Quote meh i could care less if you read it to be honest when i saw it when i was done i didnt want to read it lol. typed it out of frustration lol read it if you like if not not meh a rant is a rant