Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
WHz DS9899
Doomheim
136
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 21:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
First thing is to buff everything's sheilds,armor, and health, because it's honestly harder to kill someone in MW3. Now to actually fix vehicles: Next is to give vehicles limited ammo, Dropships having the least, LAV's second, tanks the most. After that, make turret types having different ammounts of ammo, missiles having the least, rails second, and blasters the most. Lastly, Make different ammo types change vehicle speeds (misslis slowest, rails middle, blasters fastest). This would make missiles strongest, but with the least ammo, and slowest, rails in the middle, and blasters having the most ammo, fastest, but the weakest. This would also keep Dropships from being Gunships. |
WHz DS9899
Doomheim
136
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 21:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
WHz DS9899 wrote: First thing is to buff everything's sheilds,armor, and health, because it's honestly harder to kill someone in MW3. Now to actually fix vehicles: Next is to give vehicles limited ammo, Dropships having the least, LAV's second, tanks the most. After that, make turret types having different ammounts of ammo, missiles having the least, rails second, and blasters the most. Lastly, Make different ammo types change vehicle speeds (misslis slowest, rails middle, blasters fastest). This would make missiles strongest, but with the least ammo, and slowest, rails in the middle, and blasters having the most ammo, fastest, but the weakest. This would also keep Dropships from being Gunships.
EDIT: A way to increase the ammount of ammo you carry is the same as handhelds |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 21:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
WHz DS9899 wrote:First thing is to buff everything's sheilds,armor, and health, because it's honestly harder to kill someone in MW3. And so it should be.
In MW3, you're a 30 metre tall giant robot, weighing anything up to 100 tons. If you're going to die this fast to enemy fire, there's something VERY wrong with your armour. |
WHz DS9899
Doomheim
136
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 22:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:WHz DS9899 wrote:First thing is to buff everything's sheilds,armor, and health, because it's honestly harder to kill someone in MW3. And so it should be. In MW3, you're a 30 metre tall giant robot, weighing anything up to 100 tons. If you're going to die this fast to enemy fire, there's something VERY wrong with your armour.
I think we're talking about the wrong game. I was talking about Modern Warefare 3 |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 22:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
WHz DS9899 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:WHz DS9899 wrote:First thing is to buff everything's sheilds,armor, and health, because it's honestly harder to kill someone in MW3. And so it should be. In MW3, you're a 30 metre tall giant robot, weighing anything up to 100 tons. If you're going to die this fast to enemy fire, there's something VERY wrong with your armour. I think we're talking about the wrong game. I was talking about Modern Warefare 3 Modern Warfare doesn't deserve the abbreviation. They can have MW4, but MechWarrior has a much better claim on MW, MW2 and MW3 than Modern Warfare.
So yes, you were talking about the wrong game. |
Reimus Klinsman
BetaMax.
320
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 22:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vehicles can do everything very well. They need to have a single roll. I'd love to see Vehicles being harder to kill as compinsation. |
Fivetimes Infinity
Immobile Infantry
1086
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 23:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
All that is needed is ammunition to be added in and changed. Giving vehicles either limited ammo, or semi-limited (unlimited ammo supply, but a finite magazine and a long reload time, as that other guy suggested), and also changing the weapon types so that they aren't all good at killing infantry, would be fine.
That's really the major issue. Except for small railguns, they're all good at killing infantry. Weapon types need to be more specialized. Infantry should not be prey to every single vehicle on the battlefield. |
drake sadani
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 01:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
instead of that why not just introduce a rapid accelerating anti tank weapon. and put weak points on the vehicles . like a game that was out a while ago that was called fattle bield 3 |
WHz DS9899
Doomheim
136
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 21:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
drake sadani wrote:instead of that why not just introduce a rapid accelerating anti tank weapon. and put weak points on the vehicles . like a game that was out a while ago that was called fattle bield 3
1: explain the new AV weapon
2:there's already weak points in shields
3: how would a new AV weapon help? It wouldn't. |
WHz DS9899
Doomheim
136
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 21:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:WHz DS9899 wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:WHz DS9899 wrote:First thing is to buff everything's sheilds,armor, and health, because it's honestly harder to kill someone in MW3. And so it should be. In MW3, you're a 30 metre tall giant robot, weighing anything up to 100 tons. If you're going to die this fast to enemy fire, there's something VERY wrong with your armour. I think we're talking about the wrong game. I was talking about Modern Warefare 3 Modern Warfare doesn't deserve the abbreviation. They can have MW4, but MechWarrior has a much better claim on MW, MW2 and MW3 than Modern Warfare. So yes, we were talking about the wrong game.
fixed. Anyways, that is true, but youdon't have to act like the game was total ****, it ok at least a 6.5-7..... |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 22:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
WHz DS9899 wrote:that is true, but youdon't have to act like the game was total ****, it ok at least a 6.5-7..... I never said it was BAD, just that it's not deserving of the "MW" abbreviation taken by the MechWarrior series.
But they're skipping 4, so Modern Warfare can have that one. |
drake sadani
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.11.24 00:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
there is weak points in shields . then make them obvious >.> color them different or something because i never knew and i was never told and i never saw a difference
and my idea of a AT weapon was unguided and precision . like a anti tank laser |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |