|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cpl Quartz
127
   |
Posted - 2012.10.16 18:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
OgTheEnigma wrote:Bubbles moon wrote:Unreal engine 3 is great. If you want to make games with it too, You should follow my video tutorials I'm making in a few months. It's graphics are limiting only by the platform you are putting the game on. Remember dust has a terrible texture loading issue that makes it look like a ps2/ps1 game. It will be fixed. To test this fix stare at an ugly gray crate on any map. Make sure it looks super ugly. Then wait 2 minutes, don't look away.
TADA, high res textures suddenly appear!
Point is it's awesome and you should make games with it too. : ) Textures taking ages too load = proof of awsomeness? The way Unreal Engine handles textures is one of the worst aspect about it, simply because of the pop-in. No point of having hi res textures if you can't even see them most of the time.
valve are guilty too.
|
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 19:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:OgTheEnigma wrote:The main issue is that Unreal Engine 3 generally performs quite poorly on PS3. But we're way too far into development now to make any fundamental engine changes (not to mention the whole licensing situation). It could change if Dust is developed on PS4 or other next gen consoles in the future (or even PC) but for now we'll just have to make do. Dust is not going ti be 'developed' for ps4 as its basically going to be a direct transfer. (Buy ps4, download dust client, input details, pick up from where you left off on ps3) They are probably aware that unreal 3 doesn't perform to its maximum potential on ps3 due to the fact ps4 will be out within two years, so when ps4 is released......unreal 3 will run max performance. They planned ahead is all, very smart thinking on ccp's part I say.
******* dumb asses tieing themselves to a ******* donkey.
|
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 20:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
oh no, no section 8 dumb americans. this nightmare gets worse and worse. deleted and forgot just because. |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 20:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
unreal 4 will be just as bad, same people same ****. at least one of them had the decency to go. and he was one of the ones that had to put up with this ****. |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 21:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
dont blame other developers ******* epic couldnt make their own engine work for them so **** knows why anyone else would buy an engine from them. |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 21:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Naustradamus Oracle wrote:Ieukoplast wrote:I've always hated the Unreal engine, there was just too many incredibly bad games made with it in early PS3 years that tarnished and made the console look bad in comparison to the 360. It used to be a tell that the game was garbage (if it was on PS3).
They would have done good to use something like the Havok engine, which is proven to work extremely well on the PS3. The Unreal engine just doesn't seem to play well with the PS3 architecture. My guess is that before Sony bought the exclusivity, the 360 was the main focus and thus the Unreal engine would have performed admirably, while us PS3 users would have gotten the shaft, as like the olden days...
Consoles in general wasn't a main focus back then ... it was a goal, but not the focus. PC gaming is still relevant, but now a days, console gaming is larger, that's why I'm sure Epic will be working much more closely with Sony, Microsoft, etc to make UE4 work as best as possible
and still ******* fail. 128 players in this game and im still waiting. |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 22:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
Xavier Hastings wrote:The sad thing is that Unreal allows limited building destruction.
I mean, who wouldn't want to destroy towers and bridges and watch everything collapse?
Correct me if I am wrong. or watch rains come in an sweep whole buildings away - ps3 - dynamic maps impossible. i have a toaster thats more powerfull. |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 23:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
you missed the best - killing floor, used all the good things unreal engine had to offer and turned all the bad ones into advantages.
|
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 23:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
DON RODIE II wrote:Cpl Quartz wrote:Naustradamus Oracle wrote:Ieukoplast wrote:I've always hated the Unreal engine, there was just too many incredibly bad games made with it in early PS3 years that tarnished and made the console look bad in comparison to the 360. It used to be a tell that the game was garbage (if it was on PS3).
They would have done good to use something like the Havok engine, which is proven to work extremely well on the PS3. The Unreal engine just doesn't seem to play well with the PS3 architecture. My guess is that before Sony bought the exclusivity, the 360 was the main focus and thus the Unreal engine would have performed admirably, while us PS3 users would have gotten the shaft, as like the olden days...
Consoles in general wasn't a main focus back then ... it was a goal, but not the focus. PC gaming is still relevant, but now a days, console gaming is larger, that's why I'm sure Epic will be working much more closely with Sony, Microsoft, etc to make UE4 work as best as possible and still ******* fail. 128 players in this game and im still waiting. I WOULD BE HAPPY WITH 48 PLAYERS....THATS JUST ME I GUESS. BUT 128 WOULD BE GREAT. I WANT THAT TOO.
you'll be lucky with 16 v 16 that works properly |
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 23:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
DON RODIE II wrote:Xavier Hastings wrote:The sad thing is that Unreal allows limited building destruction.
I mean, who wouldn't want to destroy towers and bridges and watch everything collapse?
Correct me if I am wrong. LOL U MUST BE A BF3 PLAYER? I am to but I'm sick of BF3 due to the lack of customization in your character. Dust 514 and planetside 2 is what I always wanted. I don't care about blowing up buildings. Besides, the buildings rarely are blowed up in battlefield. its just a gammic lol
what about dynamic maps so your not playing the same old **** every time?
|
|
|
Cpl Quartz
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 23:17:00 -
[11] - Quote
Xavier Hastings wrote:DON RODIE II wrote:Xavier Hastings wrote:The sad thing is that Unreal allows limited building destruction.
I mean, who wouldn't want to destroy towers and bridges and watch everything collapse?
Correct me if I am wrong. LOL U MUST BE A BF3 PLAYER? I am to but I'm sick of BF3 due to the lack of customization in your character. Dust 514 and planetside 2 is what I always wanted. I don't care about blowing up buildings. Besides, the buildings rarely are blowed up in battlefield. its just a gammic lol What customization? What? I get to paint my suit red for real money? Wow! Five Stars! Trolling aside... Well, what I really want is to destroy bridges. Massive glob of enemies? Use a remote explosive and blow the bridge up. Even better if you covered the alternative route. Plus, remote explosives would actually be useful then.
1+ anything so maps change and tactics change, preferably not player driven. - road got washed away cant take tank there now, rethink tactics on the hop. |
|
|
| |
|