|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
   |
Posted - 2012.09.16 22:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ignatius Crumwald wrote:Average Joe81 wrote:OP railgun instalation 
Exact same face I made.
I kinda figured since installations are non mobile defensive emplacements, they're kinda supposed to be freakishly strong. Besides, 3-4 shots from a Standard tank railgun will destroy any weapon emplacement...they're easy to deal with as long as you don't go charging at them like an idiot. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 22:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Average Joe81 wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:Ignatius Crumwald wrote:Average Joe81 wrote:OP railgun instalation Exact same face I made. I kinda figured since installations are non mobile defensive emplacements, they're kinda supposed to be freakishly strong. Besides, 3-4 shots from a Standard tank railgun will destroy any weapon emplacement...they're easy to deal with as long as you don't go charging at them like an idiot. i had a blaster, it was out of range and also im pretty sure they have a proto level turret that shouldn't be accesable by just any one
I had a shotgun, he had a proto sniper rifle, clearly the sniper is OP
*facepalm*
You're complaining you were getting your ass kicked by someone in a defensive emplacement that YOU drove over to. If you have a blaster and can't retaliate against a long range emplacement, don't go near any defensive emplacements. The whole point of the emplacements is to keep enemy infantry and tanks, like you, away from their hard spawn point....clearly working as intended, you're just butthurt because you can't bumrush their spawn with a blaster. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 22:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:i highly doubt it that this is the end of the line in terms of vehicle/AV balance. What we experience is total extremes before we had very strong tanks now we have extreme effective AV weapons. Dont you guys get it? CCP wants that we play in a certain way. If your tank gets allmost instantly blowed then CCP doesnt want that you "test" tanks and focus more on infantry. In my opinion we will see something combined like good Av weapons vs good tanks. Well im gonna see how it is in the next build.
Thank you for actually understanding. People are freaking out thinking the current values are final...which is just pathetically stupid considering in the official announcement Wolfman says "THESE FIXES ARE NOT FINAL"
Plus passive skill bonuses and pilot suits are on the way, which will buff tanks up quite a bit. But you know how the internet is, always the knee jerk outrage and then the thinking comes later, if ever. |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 23:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
STB Vermaak Doe wrote:The i win button is sniper rifles now
I thought it was Cavity grenades? |
Pokey Dravon
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
583
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 03:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jane DeArc wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:STB Vermaak Doe wrote:The i win button is sniper rifles now I thought it was Cavity grenades? It is Cavity grenades, he's just crying because he has a "Sniping is OP" thread. Which is based on flawed logic since the thread agrees that sniping damage is fine, there is just no one killing snipers, and the snipers giving anecdotes are people sniping CORRECTLY and in a SKILLED fashion.
Snipers don't bother me so much, they're just have a really nice map to play on (The spire map, whatever its called). As long as you keep moving snipers are really not an issue unless perhaps you're a heavy...but even then you should really never be way out in the open and on foot. If anything I'm more irritated with snipers when I join an ambush game where its about evenly matched, and then someone flies a dropship to the Plateaus tower, and literally NINE snipers are hanging out up there. *facepalm* |
|
|
| |
|