|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Average Joe81
57
   |
Posted - 2012.09.16 21:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
the AV people preached about how there should never be one and now that they have it they don't say anything but nonsensical remarks. when i mean i win here is a story: i drive up in a madrugar and shoot some people. i can't retreat because of an OP railgun instalation so im forced forwards. some one comes up behind me and spams all three nades at me and im dead. no way to turn in time and no way to escape in time. although i admit that i only paid 3 mil for it i used 4 damage reductions so it shouldn't of died that quickly from a 1000 isk(around that much) weapon |
Average Joe81
57
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 21:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Daedra Lord9 wrote:It's an insanely situational weapon though, unlike the tank. AV grenades ONLY work on vehicles. Tanks work against everything.
guns work on people, and that doesn't take up the gun spot |
Average Joe81
57
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 21:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Dude. Your other thread just got locked. Give it up already, you HAD a win button as a tank driver, now you DON'T HAVE a win button as a tank driver, get over it.
wait it got locked? and also ive said this alot already but no one listens, HIDE FROM THE TANK then go |
Average Joe81
57
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 22:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Icy Tiger wrote:Thing is, you can't just start complaining after one bad situation. I played a lot of matches today, and I'm fine with tanks now.
its not one situation, the nade spamming pisses me off a lot but still i only made this thread to make AV realize that they are being kind of hypocritical |
Average Joe81
57
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 22:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pokey Dravon wrote:Ignatius Crumwald wrote:Average Joe81 wrote:OP railgun instalation  Exact same face I made. I kinda figured since installations are non mobile defensive emplacements, they're kinda supposed to be freakishly strong. Besides, 3-4 shots from a Standard tank railgun will destroy any weapon emplacement...they're easy to deal with as long as you don't go charging at them like an idiot.
i had a blaster, it was out of range and also im pretty sure they have a proto level turret that shouldn't be accesable by just any one |
Average Joe81
57
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 22:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Wait.
So, you called in a tank when you knew anti armor defense systems were still in place, and decided to engage in an area covered by them anyways.
Then you lost your tank between the railgun and enough time to be hit by 3 AV grenades without you or your gunner taking that guy out.
And that makes tanks UP?
Did I get that right?
no, you didn't. i healed up before going forwards to sheild my allies from 3 assault people. my allies were retards and couldn't handle one enemy so then, not knowing there were any enemies behind me some one came with av nades and droped me from 100% to 0%. also i didn't see anyone prior to this so i didn't have a chance to get a gunner. |
Average Joe81
57
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 22:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
god i hate the ignorence of these AV people...
i have said plenty of times before infantry never want to actually help tanks, it is usually because they come from games where teamwork doesen't exist(such as cod) or they don't wan't the tanks to steal their kills. to the people saying that any tank driver with skill can servive, you are basicly saying: let the guy with the expensive stuff require skill, we shoudn't need any because we usually have 2 other people working with us. to the people who say tanks were iwin, the only map that applies to is the map that was made in this new build because it has no cover. considering that you almost always can tell where a tank is you can just hide from it.
also i have said on the first page some information about what happened that makes a lot of your posts not make sense |
|
|
| |
|