|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
   |
Posted - 2012.09.14 22:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:They need to split the main turret from the driver and require a separate operator, that way tanks will NEED teamwork just like everyone else. Oh, and that acceleration nerf. Then they can think about upping the strength of tanks again, but not until then. So long as tanks remain solo beasts, the should be glass cannons.
u guys are ********
no game has seperated the tank from main turret thats the single dumbest suggestion ive heard ppl post
when fighters get put in u geniuses gonna QQ and say the fighter needs to be a 2 seater and have the guns seperated from the pilot...soo ********.
tanks arent solo beasts btw, ppl are just lazy to work together
even with the nerf now ppl QQing about tanks got hit bad idk i played BF with glass tanks and a good player will still dominate in a tank if the other team lacks the tools and teamwork to deal with them
EDIT: or when MTACs get added lets hav 1 guy operate the steering and 1 guy operate the guns right? sounds intelligent right? |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 00:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Timothy Reaper wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:u guys are ********
no game has seperated the tank from main turret thats the single dumbest suggestion ive heard ppl post
when fighters get put in u geniuses gonna QQ and say the fighter needs to be a 2 seater and have the guns seperated from the pilot...soo ********.
tanks arent solo beasts btw, ppl are just lazy to work together
even with the nerf now ppl QQing about tanks got hit bad idk i played BF with glass tanks and a good player will still dominate in a tank if the other team lacks the tools and teamwork to deal with them
EDIT: or when MTACs get added lets hav 1 guy operate the steering and 1 guy operate the guns right? sounds intelligent right? I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Why does Dust have to be like other games? If game developers were always afraid to try something different then we would be stuck with Magnavox Odysseys. Plus dropships have to rely gunners, as well as LAVs. And it makes sense, given their basic design and the real life equivalents (jeeps and transport helicoptors). And yes, I know it's just a game, there's no real life laser rifles, etc. Who cares?! You ask, 'why?', I and others ask, 'why not?'
why the **** are u guys comparing LAVs and Dropships which are transport vehicles to a FUCKIN tank?
answer my question....when fighters get put in and MTACs u morons gonna moan and say u need 1 guy to operate the legs of the MTAC and 1 to gun? fighters gonna require 2 ppl?
do jets in BF3 require 2 ppl?
the attack chopper in BF3 has both pilot and gunner having guns, the transport chopper in BF3 is the Dropship...aka meant to transport troops and have 2 side guns different vehicle roles
i swear some of the suggestions u ppl give are amazing....and by amazing i mean ******** |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 00:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ieukoplast wrote:I'm definitely looking forward to playing tonight if there is indeed much less tanks owning everybody effortlessly with no consequences.
Although I seriously doubt the tank nerfs are as bad as people let on. I'm sure I still won't be able to make a dent in one until I spec to the most advanced AV gun in the game, which would probably take me another 2 billion SP in skill upgrades. I'm still trying to make enough SP to pay for a L3 skill that allows me to use a shield extender that simply gives me 66 extra HP.
honestly im still learning but def gettin much better at tankin and tank bustin other tanks with mine and so far iv not lost a tank in times i called it in tonight so far.
ive been hit with swarms and forge guns, but u know what? i had 1 or 2 of my buddies gunnin for me u know providing TEAMWORK to keep me up.
dont think the nerfs are as bad as ppl make them out to be , aggressive tankers prob mad tho cuz they cant just run right into a grp of ppl and own everyone but in no game can a tank do that so thats a GOOD nerf imo. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 02:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Mavado V Noriega wrote:why the **** are u guys comparing LAVs and Dropships which are transport vehicles to a FUCKIN tank?
answer my question....when fighters get put in and MTACs u morons gonna moan and say u need 1 guy to operate the legs of the MTAC and 1 to gun? fighters gonna require 2 ppl?
do jets in BF3 require 2 ppl?
the attack chopper in BF3 has both pilot and gunner having guns, the transport chopper in BF3 is the Dropship...aka meant to transport troops and have 2 side guns different vehicle roles
i swear some of the suggestions u ppl give are amazing....and by amazing i mean ******** Because we're suggesting that tanks take skill, coordination, and teamwork to operate, instead of lol30/0bymyselfwhileIscratchmanads
ur a dumbass
in BF3 a good tanker can still wtf pwn idiots, it takes teamwork in organised play to keep a tank up in BF same as it does in any other game
who dafuq is gonna skill into tanks and turrets and **** only to NOT use it and be a taxi? thats what the supporting gunner spots for.
a bad tanker will get taken out easy in any game
a good TANKer will need some coordination from a squad to get down and he will need help to stay alive just like any other game
ur problem was with aggressive tankers and the OPness of the mods which got nerfed, makes no sense having main turrret seperate.
still LOVE how ppl avoiding the question of when MTACs and fighters come in if they gonna ***** how they cant solo everything and make them require 2 ppl as well
PS: its still same sort of QQin that made the heavy dropsuit useless and not feared anymore because ppl cried how they couldnt solo heavies straight up 100% of the time and it actually required some brainwork to get a heavy down 1st build |
|
|
| |
|