|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shadows Maker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
129
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 16:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Totally agree with OP, stop defending your toy tanks are NOT fine! one of my corp mates was rolling a fully fitted tank in the first week of this build and now he is spamming tanks in every battle like no tomorrow because he has cumulated millions of isk he doesn't even care when he lose one i think he lost 2 tanks until now. He isn't a HAV user but got sick of there OPness and decided to show everyone how easy to specialize in tanks and doesn't require "skills" to operate them as many HAV users claim. They are definitely the win button and no amount of explanation can deny that but i still have faith on CCP to fix that. These are FACTS^
flame away tank-boys |
Shadows Maker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
129
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 19:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
STB-LURCHASAURUS EV wrote:xAckie wrote:STB-LURCHASAURUS EV wrote:xAckie wrote:yes. yes. thats right. its much harder and much more sp. Thats why the games full of them.
ah, sarcasm. yes. next time try responding with facts, but whatever, fighting an uphill battle with these things is understandably tough when most of your argument is qq. there are a lot more tanks because a lot of the infantry have gotten frustrated with the few actually good tank drivers and have jumped on the bandwagon, which is fine since now i have new tanks to pop with my anti-tank fit. doesn't mean they are good and they certainly dont last the match. facts are all above and in other threads. the rest of your comments are just troll qq threads dont make facts. the ccp video i am referring to however is full of goodies straight form the devs that apparently never answer anyone's complaints. Truth is, if you guys would actually watch this stuff instead of whining, most of your complaints are already answered. like months ago. again, facts here people. so you are stating that the AV vs Tanks is balanced as it is now? am really surprised of your tankboysim at least other tank drivers agreed that AV needs some work while the tanks are fine (which is not imho) but still they accept others argument but you, oh boy! i am glad am not in your corp i think you would team kill all your AV teammates for not using tanks lol |
Shadows Maker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
129
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 19:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
STB-LURCHASAURUS EV wrote: rather than trying to trivialize my posts, read them. you would see that i have not said things are balanced, but will be significantly affected by the implementation of ewar, the SAME stance CCP has right now. Because i only state what CCP has backed up.
guess im a ccp fanboy for regurgitating what they say for people who refuse to look at their vids and cough up their own "facts"
lots of qq and a lot of, "Don't listen to this guy, he's inept cause he doesn't agree with the qq bandwagon."
just so you know am not AV guy but a HAV user If CCP doesn't fix the current AV vs Tank state well more kills for me and if they do balance it i'll be happy for my AV teammates so the QQ thingy doesn't apply on me am just trying to be fair |
|
|
|