|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
   |
Posted - 2012.09.01 08:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Quote:Skills
'Next build you should see a larger number of skills providing bonsues.'
Oh come'on!
More bonuses for stats, why?
Also skills give bonuses without trade-off: welcome cheapness.
Really this is a FPS player's skills should be the only hings that matter in a FPS not in-game stats.
Why newcomers must be disadvantaged so much simply because they are new and don't have access to the enough in-game skills. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 08:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
I am not talking about books that unlock gear, those are fine.
I am talking bout skill that "give you BONUSES".
|
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 08:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Listening/talking to 10-20 pole instead then 200 or 2k is the reason why the FPS players here all disappointed by Dust and why the gameplay/shooting is not good.
What are we here for then?
I was told that CCP was reading here but it's clear that IRC comes first. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 08:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
I proposed/asked CCP to make survey & polls to get specific feedback on a large scale.
That, combined with the forums would have sufficed to get the feedback they needed.
Yours are all excuses.
Ways to get us all involved exist and are are far from chaotic. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 09:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Quote:The forums don't support polls.
Well, then they should have made forums that does support polls.
What stopped them, this are just temporary forums so they coudl have used the omnipresent vBulleting wich is super-cheap to license (less then 200$ I believe, CCP has 200$ to spare isn't it)
Quote:It would have required additional work.
Really.
Guess what: when you make a big product, and an ambitious one such as Dust, begin stingy isn't going to help, especially on the feedback side.
Those additional work/money would not have gone in vain I assure you.
Quote:But it's not like the discussion we had with them was us providing more than you can in the currently available means.
So why have IRC it in the first place if ti does nothing different.
That is wasting money and time.
We asked countless of time about a better communication, but nothing changed.
We'll see if this will pay off.
So far this only caused problems and discontent, and it's showing in the game. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 12:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
I repeat: why don't use the forums directly.
We asked CCP use them, we begged them to use the forums more and they din't.
I was told that CCP was communicative with his fans/customers but here communication is appalling at best. |
Templar Two
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
459
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 13:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
First I am talking about making specific polls/surveys, asking specific question on specific themes.
Second: many FPS players know what they like and what makes a FPS feel good under the thumbs.
Me and a lot of guys here have been saying from months that the gamepaly is poor and that needs to be improved completely.
I personally gave feedback on everything gameplay related, form animations, to sounds, to stats, etc...
Our opinions were discarded because, hell, we have not the right credentials: we are just a normal FPS players, some with decades of experience in FPS...we are not EVE players.
CCP don't believe us, don't trust our judgment, so be it: it will have to face the consequences of this.
Dust is getting a lot of bad publicity form PS+ players and journalist that say the same things we said for months: I see a link between this and CCP not listening to people that have played FPS for decades.
We don't have credential but we know what we are talking about.
Claiming we don't understand what a good FPS is about and ignore us already did a lot of damage.
Do you want more? |
|
|
| |
|