| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Super Cargo
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
428
   |
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
"I am Tank Guy. And this...is my vehicle. She veighs 15,000 kilograms and fires 20,000ISK custom-tooled railgun cartridges at 60 rounds per minute. It cost 500,000ISK to field this vehicle...for 12 seconds.
Some AV clones think they can outsmart me. MaybeGǪ maybe. I've yet to meet AV clone that can outsmart Sagaris railgun."
For the love of God CCP, buff AV weapon effectiveness versus vehicles. This is getting ridiculous. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1060
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
The heavy from team fortress 2 is the equal to the heavy with a HMG from Dust 514. On Team fortress 2 you see medics running behind a heavy. On dust you see logistics running behind heavys with HMG. I know what you did there CCP.
And about the sagaris thing:
i scared 1 away on the skirmish map that has the part of biomass in it. Camped a tower an kept shoting swarms. Allmost destroyed it but he got lucky and found cover. Havent seen that tank then the whole match again and my team won easy with all objectives captured. And whats so special about T2 tanks? They lost their damag multiplyer and they have equal CPU/PG as T1 tanks. The only difference is probably the painting. |
Zero Harpuia
Maverick Conflict Solutions
422
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
This just in, AV weapons got a temporary... nerf... sunnovakitten.
|
kalahari ilkeston
Tronhadar Free Guard
Minmatar Republic
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
What are the stats on installations, tank vs installations, installations should have more shields and armour then high end tanks |
Khun-Al
135
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Super Cargo wrote:
For the love of God CCP, buff AV weapon effectiveness versus vehicles. This is getting ridiculous.
Are you crazy? What do you mean is AV standing for? They are made to kill tanks! What do you think if they would buff the splash radius of your railgun to 1m because it is too effective against infantry? Think about this! |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
What is this I hear about people being gable to throw a bunch of AV grenades on the ground, without them exploding, until an enemy vehicle run over them? |
Nahtlog
17
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Super Cargo wrote:"I am Tank Guy. And this...is my vehicle. She veighs 15,000 kilograms and fires 20,000ISK custom-tooled railgun cartridges at 60 rounds per minute. It cost 500,000ISK to field this vehicle...for 12 seconds.
Some AV clones think they can outsmart me. MaybeGǪ maybe. I've yet to meet AV clone that can outsmart Sagaris railgun."
For the love of God CCP, buff AV weapon effectiveness versus vehicles. This is getting ridiculous.
Love, the thread, but yes, there was a temporary nerf. Here is the thread: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=282524#post282524 |
Ignatius Crumwald
Sanmatar Kelkoons
Minmatar Republic
475
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Well then I'm only temporarily BOYCOTTING CORP BATTLES.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=34211&find=unread |
Zero Harpuia
Maverick Conflict Solutions
422
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Khun-Al wrote:Super Cargo wrote:
For the love of God CCP, buff AV weapon effectiveness versus vehicles. This is getting ridiculous.
Are you crazy? What do you mean is AV standing for? They are made to kill tanks! What do you think if they would buff the splash radius of your railgun to 1m because it is too effective against infantry? Think about this!
A buff is STRENGTHENING a function, a nerf is WEAKENING a function. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |