Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 11:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
i just read a post about a spawning tanks on top of the towers and driving them off the edge. this got me thinking why do tanks need a drop ships to transport them to the ground. why can't tanks be drop out of a ship and then use dampers to land on the ground when you call a tank in?
|
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 11:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
The current method works a little better and most things that fall from space to solid land end up wrecked |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 11:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:The current method works a little better and most things that fall from space to solid land end up wrecked
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18933037
if we can do it then i think dust 514 would have a better way to get weapons to the ground? |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 11:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
4447 wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:The current method works a little better and most things that fall from space to solid land end up wrecked http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18933037if we can do it then i think dust 514 would have a better way to get weapons to the ground?
You do realize it used parachutes and weight thousands times less right? |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
AND required about 3 years of number crunching just to get the trajectory right for a good landing. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:AND required about 3 years of number crunching just to get the trajectory right for a good landing.
Exactly it shouldn't be done on a dime |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
your forgetting eve is "Set more than 21,000 years in the future", and we're in 2012. so if eve is "21,000 years in the future", they would have surpassed quantum computers meaning a landing something would have been done in a nano second. |
VigSniper101
204
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Man lm not awake yet...l read this as Tanks with Diapers. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
4447 wrote:your forgetting eve is "Set more than 21,000 years in the future", and we're in 2012. so if eve is "21,000 years in the future", they would have surpassed quantum computers meaning a landing something would have been done in a nano second.
The vehicle delivery system will be people controlled meaning you'll rely on someone to make sure you get your vehicle |
Booker DaFooker
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
69
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
VigSniper101 wrote:Man lm not awake yet...l read this as Tanks with Diapers.
Sh*tty tanks! lol |
|
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:4447 wrote:your forgetting eve is "Set more than 21,000 years in the future", and we're in 2012. so if eve is "21,000 years in the future", they would have surpassed quantum computers meaning a landing something would have been done in a nano second. The vehicle delivery system will be people controlled meaning you'll rely on someone to make sure you get your vehicle
no it would be computer operated. |
dust badger
BetaMax.
283
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:42:00 -
[12] - Quote
i think it will be delivered by AI but i think i read something about the commander having to accept the vehicle request |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 12:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
4447 wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:4447 wrote:your forgetting eve is "Set more than 21,000 years in the future", and we're in 2012. so if eve is "21,000 years in the future", they would have surpassed quantum computers meaning a landing something would have been done in a nano second. The vehicle delivery system will be people controlled meaning you'll rely on someone to make sure you get your vehicle no it would be computer operated.
It will have to be oked by Eve players |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 13:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:4447 wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:4447 wrote:your forgetting eve is "Set more than 21,000 years in the future", and we're in 2012. so if eve is "21,000 years in the future", they would have surpassed quantum computers meaning a landing something would have been done in a nano second. The vehicle delivery system will be people controlled meaning you'll rely on someone to make sure you get your vehicle no it would be computer operated. It will have to be oked by Eve players
why because the drop ship that brings down a tank isn't controlled by a eve player? |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 13:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
4447 wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:4447 wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:4447 wrote:your forgetting eve is "Set more than 21,000 years in the future", and we're in 2012. so if eve is "21,000 years in the future", they would have surpassed quantum computers meaning a landing something would have been done in a nano second. The vehicle delivery system will be people controlled meaning you'll rely on someone to make sure you get your vehicle no it would be computer operated. It will have to be oked by Eve players why because the drop ship that brings down a tank isn't controlled by a eve player?
Because it comes from their ships |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 13:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
where do the drop ships come from? |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 13:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
4447 wrote:where do the drop ships come from? When the daddy dropship likes the mommy dropship... |
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 13:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 13:52:00 -
[19] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so Oh yes! Using tanks as space projectiles! Forget about planetary bombardment by an EVE player. Just toss those tanks out of the Battle Barge! |
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so Oh yes! Using tanks as space projectiles! Forget about planetary bombardment by an EVE player. Just toss those tanks out of the Battle Barge!
lol most expensive anvil |
|
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so
you call in a tank it gets dropped from a ship. the tank itself is within a unit with first and second booster. the tank hits max velocity first booster kicks in, later the second boost kicks in, then the dampers kicks in at the end for the landing.
|
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
4447 wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so you call in a tank it gets dropped from a ship. the tank itself is within a unit with first and second booster. the tank hits max velocity first booster kicks in, later the second boost kicks in, then the dampers kicks in at the end for the landing.
doesnt that mean it is still being dropped off by a dropship? or r u saying they glide? |
Grit Breather
BetaMax.
660
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:39:00 -
[23] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:4447 wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so you call in a tank it gets dropped from a ship. the tank itself is within a unit with first and second booster. the tank hits max velocity first booster kicks in, later the second boost kicks in, then the dampers kicks in at the end for the landing. doesnt that mean it is still being dropped off by a dropship? or r u saying they glide? He's saying they are shot from space in a 2 stage rocket. Kinda sound like the moon landing to me. |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
they would be drop out of a cargo bay on a ship |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
Grit Breather wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:4447 wrote:KingBlade82 wrote:conservation of energy......energy cannot be created or destroyed and the weight of a tank would create a giant shockwave even with dampeners it would force the energy outside but can u use them on tanks? i think the logic is flawed if so you call in a tank it gets dropped from a ship. the tank itself is within a unit with first and second booster. the tank hits max velocity first booster kicks in, later the second boost kicks in, then the dampers kicks in at the end for the landing. doesnt that mean it is still being dropped off by a dropship? or r u saying they glide? He's saying they are shot from space in a 2 stage rocket. Kinda sound like the moon landing to me.
it would be faster then using a drop ship to land a tank. |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:45:00 -
[26] - Quote
So far we don't even know if any of the in-game assets actually drop from orbit, and not the MCC, where we already know the RDVs come from. I would personally assume that the weapon installations at least are deployed directly from the War Barge, but we haven't had that confirmed. Also, the idea behind the RDVs is that they all cloak while carrying assets, so that up until they make their final approach, the enemy has no idea that you're bringing in said asset. The flaming object falling from the sky would kind of be a dead giveaway. |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 14:53:00 -
[27] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:So far we don't even know if any of the in-game assets actually drop from orbit, and not the MCC, where we already know the RDVs come from. I would personally assume that the weapon installations at least are deployed directly from the War Barge, but we haven't had that confirmed. Also, the idea behind the RDVs is that they all cloak while carrying assets, so that up until they make their final approach, the enemy has no idea that you're bringing in said asset. The flaming object falling from the sky would kind of be a dead giveaway.
you would see it enter the atmosphere but after that you wouldn't see it coming. |
KingBlade82
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 15:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
4447 wrote:they would be drop out of a cargo bay on a ship
that may cause damage to the tank itself or those would have to be some seriously badass thrusters and also idk why dropships have to be dropped off :P during gameplay it makes sense but i see one too many steps in it |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 15:14:00 -
[29] - Quote
Actually, there's also the fact that the Inertial Cancellers are just that. They aren't any form of shield, so anything using one would just cook if dropped from orbit. You'll notice that even in the FanFest trailer, that dropship reenters the atmosphere first, and then deploys them only a few hundred feet above the ground. |
4447
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
649
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 15:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
KingBlade82 wrote:4447 wrote:they would be drop out of a cargo bay on a ship that may cause damage to the tank itself or those would have to be some seriously badass thrusters and also idk why dropships have to be dropped off :P during gameplay it makes sense but i see one too many steps in it
it's within unit until it use it's dampers. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |