"Draw distance is a computer graphics term, defined as the maximum distance of objects in a three dimensional scene that are drawn by the rendering engine. Polygons that lie behind the draw distance won't be drawn to the screen."

I'm guessing that CCP has prioritized developing their network and networked events (hit detection, lag, comms, connection issues, player database, etc.) and basic game mechanics (physics, collision issues, disappearing asset issues, etc.) over draw distance. The fact that this is a multiplayer game confounds a lot of what would otherwise be simpler.

And CCP has said they hear what players are saying regarding draw distances. I don't recall any firm promises, though.

There is a point of merit in this topic, but I fear it just require a huge reevaluation on how battles are staged. By sheer technical limitation, there has to be an edge to the map and until we have actual hot drops with with viable attacking and defense options, I would rather the redline have a lore reason. For example, the MCC could project a very tight POS style shield on the deployment zone (the red-line). Perhaps with a limitation that it is exit only (so no bouncing in and out of immunity).

Personally, I would love to see the battle open with the attackers coming in by loaded dropships and RDVs with pilots already jacked in. Then leave it up to the attackers and defenders to see if a foothold can be established and where. But CCP is trying to "idiot-proof" some aspects of the game; I doubt an opening that could be stonewalled so brutally will be allowed to go live, even if it is more immersion.