DUST Search - orbital strikes are in planetside 2

All Channels

General Discussions

orbital strikes are in planetside 2

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
mana max EVE'S Best 2	Posted - 2017.08.03 22:49:00 - [1] - Quote /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\
Sergeant Sazu Mantodea MC 1177	Posted - 2017.08.03 23:10:00 - [2] - Quote Much harder to pull off though. There's a lot more than just "open the map and pick a spot". "Stab you to death, stab you to life!" -Truck Fist while knifing a red and reviving me
Scheneighnay McBob Penumbra or something 8082	Posted - 2017.08.04 00:15:00 - [3] - Quote People still play that game? Current state of the forums
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 4991	Posted - 2017.08.04 06:45:00 - [4] - Quote Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. #NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá choo choo motherfcker, next destination, anal devastation.n++* - Classy trainspotting comment.
Russel Moralles Klandatu 269	Posted - 2017.08.04 12:47:00 - [5] - Quote I can run it just dont wanna play it.
Moorian Flav 710	Posted - 2017.08.04 16:02:00 - [6] - Quote Not a new thing really. One of the older Battlefield titles had an area strike option (can't remember if mortar or air strike) that you could use. The thing that made it different in DUST is that it could be provided by other (EVE) players. I don't troll; I tell the truth. I'm also known as "The ANTI-Propaganda Machine".
pana pan burnin fires 0	Posted - 2017.08.04 17:08:00 - [7] - Quote mana max wrote: /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ orbital strikes in planet side 2 = boot leged orbital strikes from dust 514
cmdr dunce Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 24	Posted - 2017.08.05 22:29:00 - [8] - Quote Moorian Flav wrote: Not a new thing really. One of the older Battlefield titles had an area strike option (can't remember if mortar or air strike) that you could use. The thing that made it different in DUST is that it could be provided by other (EVE) players. yea. there was plenty of things that ccp could of blab about but 99% of the hype for this game was the "orbital strikes". orbital strikes kinda killed this game in a way. there was so many unique things this game did for an fps but everyone was hyped about the "sandbox world" and when it didn't deliver the hype for it died.
cmdr dunce Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 24	Posted - 2017.08.05 22:31:00 - [9] - Quote pana pan wrote: mana max wrote: /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ orbital strikes in planet side 2 = boot leged orbital strikes from dust 514 orbital strikes are just a really fancy way of bombing ****. so nothing new at all. dust 514 just added dubstep to it and made pewpew ships bomb us instead. and called it orbital strikes. wow. new and original.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10961	Posted - 2017.08.06 01:06:00 - [10] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.

DeadlyAztec11 10288	Posted - 2017.08.06 05:32:00 - [11] - Quote Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. Peasants. Gameboy Advance SP, or GTFO Put your flags up in the sky. And wave them side to side. Show the world where you're from. Show the world we are one.
Sequal's Back Dead Man's Game Preatoriani 2412	Posted - 2017.08.06 09:08:00 - [12] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Just lower your settings. Gtx950 is the lower entry of the previous gen of Geforce cards after all. Not really a beast. The game runs great. It's just not so great ! "I hope we don't have vehicles [in Nova] simply so we don't have to deal with the people who drive them." -Ripley Riley
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 4997	Posted - 2017.08.06 12:56:00 - [13] - Quote Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. I'd have to buy a whole new PC, I'm not sure my current PSU could handle the 1080 Ti, and the motherboard is probably not big enough. Ey, I'm not a tech head, if you could explain what exactly I would require to get it now I'd get it. 350W PSU btw. #NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá choo choo motherfcker, next destination, anal devastation.n++* - Classy trainspotting comment.
cmdr dunce Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 24	Posted - 2017.08.06 13:47:00 - [14] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. I'd have to buy a whole new PC, I'm not sure my current PSU could handle the 1080 Ti, and the motherboard is probably not big enough. Ey, I'm not a tech head, if you could explain what exactly I would require to get it now I'd get it. 350W PSU btw. I can tell you right now 950 is good enough for modern gaming. these people are just being picky because your not using something like 1070. Planetside two is unoptimized to **. if there is a great deal of players on a map, usually perfomance takes a huge hit. I am using a ** old 770, runs the game fine. only when there is like 99+ player on the map it becomes a problem. and i guarantee you when that happens, people with 1080 ti and i9's are lagging too because the lag isnt client side... If you want to see if your computer can handle an upgrade, just put in your computer parts in https://pcpartpicker.com/ , usually it will tell you (and why) if it is compatible. Is your computer pre built or did you build the system? i gotta know if you have 0 experience with pc building.
Heimdallr69 Negative-Feedback. 7556	Posted - 2017.08.06 17:18:00 - [15] - Quote Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. I have a 1080, still wouldnt let that **** defile my system The game is stale and probably the most boring i've played
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 5013	Posted - 2017.08.06 18:18:00 - [16] - Quote cmdr dunce wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. I'd have to buy a whole new PC, I'm not sure my current PSU could handle the 1080 Ti, and the motherboard is probably not big enough. Ey, I'm not a tech head, if you could explain what exactly I would require to get it now I'd get it. 350W PSU btw. I can tell you right now 950 is good enough for modern gaming. these people are just being picky because your not using +$300 gpu. Planetside two is unoptimized to **. if there is a great deal of players on a map, usually perfomance takes a huge hit. I am using a ** old 770, runs the game fine. only when there is like 99+ player on the map it becomes a problem. and i guarantee you when that happens, people with 1080 ti and i9's are lagging too because the lag isnt client side... If you want to see if your computer can handle an upgrade, just put in your computer parts in https://pcpartpicker.com/ , usually it will tell you (and why) if it is compatible. Is your computer pre built or did you build the system? i gotta know if you have 0 experience with pc building. Pre built. Only thing it didn't come with is the case fan, which I bought and installed without problems. An expensive, high quality fan... Corsair ML120 Pro, Magnetic Levitation technology, can be completely unhearable at 400 RPM, or super cooling at 2400RPM, it rocks. Maybe I went into too much detail about that... I'm just bragging about it at this point xD One bit I forgot to mention - 950 is good enough as you said. I can run ETS2 at 60 FPS 1080p upscaled to 150% on the highest settings, and World of Tanks at the same resolution (although not upscaled) on the highest settings, and the fps only drops when there's lots of foliage around, so I just turned down the foliage quality to medium and it's all good. #NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá choo choo motherfcker, next destination, anal devastation.n++* - Classy trainspotting comment.
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 5013	Posted - 2017.08.06 18:47:00 - [17] - Quote cmdr dunce wrote: If you want to see if your computer can handle an upgrade, just put in your computer parts in https://pcpartpicker.com/ , usually it will tell you (and why) if it is compatible. Is your computer pre built or did you build the system? i gotta know if you have 0 experience with pc building. Yeah so I put all the parts on there and my PSU nor the motherboard can't fit the 1080 Ti, here's the quotes from the site: - 2 additional PCI-Express pcie8-pin power connectors are needed. - Thermaltake - Litepower 350W 80+ Certified ATX Power Supply may not provide sufficient wattage. The estimated part list maximum power draw is 398W. rip xD I tried this instead - Asus - GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Dual Video Card That fits. Still below 300W power usage, within the 350W PSU I have, and it fits onto the motherboard. #NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá choo choo motherfcker, next destination, anal devastation.n++* - Classy trainspotting comment.
LOL KILLZ LulKlz 1497	Posted - 2017.08.07 18:37:00 - [18] - Quote I play it but this game is WAY to pay to win for my taste Your friendly Pub match logi
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10962	Posted - 2017.08.07 18:49:00 - [19] - Quote cmdr dunce wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. I'd have to buy a whole new PC, I'm not sure my current PSU could handle the 1080 Ti, and the motherboard is probably not big enough. Ey, I'm not a tech head, if you could explain what exactly I would require to get it now I'd get it. 350W PSU btw. I can tell you right now 950 is good enough for modern gaming. these people are just being picky because your not using +$300 gpu. Planetside two is unoptimized to **. if there is a great deal of players on a map, usually perfomance takes a huge hit. I am using a old 770, runs the game fine. only when there is like 99+ player on the map it becomes a problem. and i guarantee you when that happens, people with 1080 ti and i9's are lagging too because the lag isnt client side... If you want to see if your computer can handle an upgrade, just put in your computer parts in https://pcpartpicker.com/ , usually it will tell you (and why) if it is compatible. Is your computer pre built or did you build the system? i gotta know if you have 0 experience with pc building. Modern gaming as in games from early 2016 maybe. Hell, I'm not even sure how many fps you'll get in DS3 Ringed City area with a 950, let alone brand new games at high settings. You can get a 1050 for, what 150 USD nowadays? I'm not sure what the other cards cost, other than the 1080 Ti but last time I checked, they were way too expensive for what they offered thanks to the ether mining boom. As for the i9... That thing is absolutely trash for the cost. AMD is putting up a way better fight than they are before and competition with Intel has brought up new innovative again :) Scouts United** Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10962	Posted - 2017.08.07 18:52:00 - [20] - Quote Heimdallr69 wrote: Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Too laggy, both graphically and by internet. Maybe if they optimized their game so I can run it at a stable 60fps with a GTX950, I would actually consider playing it again. Lol 950... Get a real job and buy a 1080 Ti. I have a 1080, still wouldnt let that ** defile my system The game is stale and probably the most boring i've played Oh, sweet. I've been looking at the MSI 1080 Ti Lightning, but I have to pay a few bills first haha Scouts United** Gk.0s & Quafes all day.

Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10964	Posted - 2017.08.07 18:59:00 - [21] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: cmdr dunce wrote: If you want to see if your computer can handle an upgrade, just put in your computer parts in https://pcpartpicker.com/ , usually it will tell you (and why) if it is compatible. Is your computer pre built or did you build the system? i gotta know if you have 0 experience with pc building. Yeah so I put all the parts on there and my PSU nor the motherboard can't fit the 1080 Ti, here's the quotes from the site: - 2 additional PCI-Express pcie8-pin power connectors are needed. - Thermaltake - Litepower 350W 80+ Certified ATX Power Supply may not provide sufficient wattage. The estimated part list maximum power draw is 398W. rip xD I tried this instead - Asus - GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Dual Video Card That fits. Still below 300W power usage, within the 350W PSU I have, and it fits onto the motherboard. Get like a 600W PSU and you should be good for a long while with any part. I still use the one I bought from years ago. If it doesn't fit on the board, chances are you have an old mobo. I have a Maximus IX Hero for sale, if you are interested in buying one. Brand new, never taken out of the box 1060 is enough for modern gaming, but not for extreme graphics. You can get stable 60 fps @1080p if you get one with decent clocks. You can even try to OC it, but that'll depend on the silicon lottery. *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
deadpool lifetone D3ATH CARD RUST415 364	Posted - 2017.08.07 21:50:00 - [22] - Quote . In all honesty , after i got that 70 & 80 kill streaks i just stopped........way to damn easy , i love the idea & its fun. But better graphics dont make it a better game....... . BF1 has competition & some real tactical squads.....just gata build up the corps now.....level 90 trying to get to level 110...... . ( F U!!!! ) * ( Why Dead? ) , (n+Æn+Çn+¢´)GÇón++pâçGòÉS+ÇX - - - - n++(º Gûí º l\|l)/
cmdr dunce Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 26	Posted - 2017.09.16 15:33:00 - [23] - Quote Joel II X wrote: Modern gaming as in games from early 2016 maybe. Hell, I'm not even sure how many fps you'll get in DS3 Ringed City area with a 950, let alone brand new games at high settings. Firstly, with a prebuilt, he is probably not running on high or above settings. and in some games the difference between low and ultra tends to be more negligible nowadays. not worth running past medium, even in a high end setup, because you will loose alot of fps for 0 improvement. Secondly, a quick check on youtube shows that the GTX 950 is capable of running modern games released this year at an more than acceptable framerate. though i'm under the impression that you're the kind of person that would say a game is unplayable if you have even one frame under 120 hz in ultra. You mention dark souls. well here you go. took like 2 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NH-VBoACE0 it runs ~45 Hz, on 1080p, at maximum settings. no 60 Hz, but more than acceptable. However, if this was lowered to a more reasonable medium settings, he would probably hit 60 hz easily. Resident evil 7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImKgIwrLV4I With tweaks that are clearly visible, this guy managed to get on average ~90 Hz at 1080p from what I am seeing in the video. this game came out in early 2017. Of course, this isn't on Ultra. but due to the way modern games are made, these settings are not disgusting. they are more than acceptable to most people, unless you are trying to have a epeen contest. Prey https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFeBIONPROw Again, tweaked settings on 1080p, around ~60-70 Hz. More than acceptable quality of graphics. WatchDogs 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6HnLr_5_kA To show i am not biased, here is a game that is running around ~30hz. 30hz may be acceptable for some, and more so if said person is using a pre build with a four year old gpu that was bottom tier when it came out. but i suspect this is worst case scenario, since ubisoft is known to not have very good optimization. Witcher 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL0Vwukx_6Q I know this is an old game, but this game is known to be pretty graphically intensive. again, it's unnecessarily running on High, and it is getting around ~45 Hz. Destiny 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sqEXBY_aEw Probably one of the newest games released right now, and it's getting ~60 hz I could go on and on, but we would be here all day. Don't get me wrong, It is a bottom tier graphics card, and I do recommend him upgrading at some point, but to say it can't handle modern gaming is just ignorant. Joel II X wrote: You can get a 1050 for, what 150 USD nowadays? I'm not sure what the other cards cost, other than the 1080 Ti but last time I checked, they were way too expensive for what they offered thanks to the ether mining boom. the GTX 1050 is not worth purchasing to replace GTX 950 since it is also bottom tier graphics card. You can currently find GTX 1060 on amazon and newegg for ~220 USD. Not that bad. It would be more than worth it. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KUADE3O?tag=amz-mkt-chr-us-20&ascsubtag=1ba00-01000-org00-win70-other-nomod-us000-pcomp-feature-pcomp-wm-2-wl-pst0_pfd1_ask1&ref=bit_pcomp_ask_simstreat_c_feedback https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814487263&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-PCPartPicker,%20LLC-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=10446076&PID=3938566&SID= Joel II X wrote: As for the i9... That thing is absolutely trash for the cost. AMD is putting up a way better fight than they are before and competition with Intel has brought up new innovative again :) If you are referring to "1080 ti and i9's" comment, of course, It was meant as a joke and exaggeration. buying a highly multithreaded cpu ment for production work that can easily run into four digit price tag for gaming is extremely stupid and obvious to all but the most novice PC builders. and no one is buying prebuilts with i9's in it just for gaming, unless they are very novice.
cmdr dunce Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 26	Posted - 2017.09.16 15:49:00 - [24] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: cmdr dunce wrote: If you want to see if your computer can handle an upgrade, just put in your computer parts in https://pcpartpicker.com/ , usually it will tell you (and why) if it is compatible. Is your computer pre built or did you build the system? i gotta know if you have 0 experience with pc building. Yeah so I put all the parts on there and my PSU nor the motherboard can't fit the 1080 Ti, here's the quotes from the site: - 2 additional PCI-Express pcie8-pin power connectors are needed. - Thermaltake - Litepower 350W 80+ Certified ATX Power Supply may not provide sufficient wattage. The estimated part list maximum power draw is 398W. rip xD I tried this instead - Asus - GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB Dual Video Card That fits. Still below 300W power usage, within the 350W PSU I have, and it fits onto the motherboard. I am a total idiot. I forgot to mention power supplies have a certain efficiency. it only goes a certain percentage of its wattage. look here http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/80plus.jpg 350 * 0.80 = 280 W, under 100% load. I do not know if that is still enough, though it would help if you linked your pcpartpicker build so I can make sure. it may be in your best interest to get this https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N9X3F8F/?tag=pcpapi-20 It is 80+ Bronze (protip: don't buy a PSU without 80+ rating, chinese crap will be at lower efficiency than 80%), and it is made by a brand name. It is 30 usd, which is far less than what your typical smug ego fueled pcmasterrace would suggest, and its not some crap from china. (or at least not cheap made crap from china) it should satisfy you for the next century when they decide to retire the ATX form factor, unless you plan on changing form factors or decide to delve in $600 GPU or sli setups. and yes, that adds 30 USD to your upgrade, but honestly, It would probably be worth it for the performance gains you would get upgrading to the GTX 1060, and also more worth it if you plan on upgrading your cpu at some point.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10998	Posted - 2017.09.17 05:27:00 - [25] - Quote cmdr dunce wrote: Joel II X // Modern gaming as in games from early 2016 maybe. Hell, I'm not even sure how many fps you'll get in DS3 Ringed City area with a 950, let alone brand new games at high settings. /// Firstly, with a prebuilt, he is probably not running on high or above settings. and in some games the difference between low and ultra tends to be more negligible nowadays. not worth running past medium, even in a high end setup, because you will loose alot of fps for 0 improvement. If you're going to game at medium, might as well buy a console, and the games are probably going to be better optimized since all consoles are the same. High-ultra should be the what one aims for if they can afford it, with a few settings here and there up for debate. cmdr dunce wrote: Secondly, a quick check on youtube shows that the GTX 950 is capable of running modern games released this year at an more than acceptable framerate. though i'm under the impression that you're the kind of person that would say a game is unplayable if you have even one frame under 120 hz in ultra. You mention dark souls. well here you go. took like 2 seconds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NH-VBoACE0 it runs ~45 Hz, on 1080p, at maximum settings. no 60 Hz, but more than acceptable. However, if this was lowered to a more reasonable medium settings, he would probably hit 60 hz easily. Define "acceptable FPS". 60 (give or take 5) frames is my minimum because that's what I'm used to nowadays. Yes, a 950 can run gana from this year, but not really up to my personal standards. I believe what I wrote already answered the DS3 bit. 45 is a no-no for me. Yeah, I played the DLC and enjoyed it, but immersion was ruined when the frames dipped. cmdr dunce wrote: Resident evil 7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImKgIwrLV4I With tweaks that are clearly visible, this guy managed to get on average ~90 Hz at 1080p from what I am seeing in the video. this game came out in early 2017. Of course, this isn't on Ultra. but due to the way modern games are made, these settings are not disgusting. they are more than acceptable to most people, unless you are trying to have a epeen contest. Prey https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFeBIONPROw Again, tweaked settings on 1080p, around ~60-70 Hz. More than acceptable quality of graphics. WatchDogs 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6HnLr_5_kA To show i am not biased, here is a game that is running around ~30hz. 30hz may be acceptable for some, and more so if said person is using a pre build with a four year old gpu that was bottom tier when it came out. but i suspect this is worst case scenario, since ubisoft is known to not have very good optimization. Witcher 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL0Vwukx_6Q I know this is an old game, but this game is known to be pretty graphically intensive. again, it's unnecessarily running on High, and it is getting around ~45 Hz. Destiny 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sqEXBY_aEw Probably one of the newest games released right now, and it's getting ~60 hz I could go on and on, but we would be here all day. Don't get me wrong, It is a bottom tier graphics card, and I do recommend him upgrading at some point, but to say it can't handle modern gaming is just ignorant. All those examples are meh, except for Destiny 2. Having played it with a low-tier rig, I'm surprised on how well this game runs. Although the gameplay is not my thing (didn't like D1 either) I can't deny that it's a good looking game and that it runs very well. However, to say it can handle modern games is ignorant. Modern games aren't meant to play like playdough. cmdr dunce wrote: Joel II X // You can get a 1050 for, what 150 USD nowadays? I'm not sure what the other cards cost, other than the 1080 Ti but last time I checked, they were way too expensive for what they offered thanks to the ether mining boom. /// the GTX 1050 is not worth purchasing to replace GTX 950 since it is also bottom tier graphics card. You can currently find GTX 1060 on amazon and newegg for ~220 USD. Not that bad. It would be more than worth it. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01KUADE3O?tag=amz-mkt-chr-us-20&ascsubtag=1ba00-01000-org00-win70-other-nomod-us000-pcomp-feature-pcomp-wm-2-wl-pst0_pfd1_ask1&ref=bit_pcomp_ask_simstreat_c_feedback https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814487263&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-PCPartPicker,%20LLC-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=104... *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10998	Posted - 2017.09.17 05:28:00 - [26] - Quote #PCSUPERIORMASTERRACE Ran out of characters in my previous post. *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
One Eyed King Nos Nothi 17308	Posted - 2017.09.17 21:47:00 - [27] - Quote My two cents, after just having put my first gaming PC together a couple weeks ago. I made a budget PC, with a Ryzen 3 1200 CPU and GTX 1050 ti. It being my first PC, I had to do a lot of research with what I wanted and whatnot. I was agonizing over the GPU, because there was a significant price difference between the 1050 ti, and the 1060 6gb card I really was hoping to get, thanks to the aforementioned currency miners. One thing that really sold it for me personally, was something that cmdr already brought up, which was framerate given particular settings. After checking out a youtube video by a long time PC gamer asking the same question, as to what you were getting vs what you were giving up, it was pretty clear that with Med/High settings, you could almost double your framerates on lower cards like the 1050 ti while giving up comparatively little. I would replay scenes over and over in his video, and could not see the distinctions between the settings. And the times I did see a difference, it was not necessarily negative, it was just different. While I could afford the 1060 6gb, I didn't see the point on spending more than twice the cost of a 1050 ti for something so negligible. IMO, while it certainly may be someone's preference to play at the highest settings, it is quite narrow minded to suggest it ignorant modern games wouldn't want to be playable on lower settings on older cards. What company in their right mind would want to limit the number of players they can reach? If playing on the highest graphical settings were a games sole objective, companies would never port to consoles, and would solely focus on high end PC games. In fact, the GeForce Experience is designed just for optimizing frame rates and settings. Why would a GPU maker want to do that if they thought that people should only enjoy games at the ultra settings? Why would they want people to hold on to GPUs longer? It seems to me they understand that PC gaming is more than just for the elitists, despite what the #PCMasterRace thinks. Former CEO of the Land of the BIind. Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 5143	Posted - 2017.09.17 22:21:00 - [28] - Quote Damn, old post much? Almost forgot we had this conversation about what a 2gb GTX950 can handle... I'm sticking to it, it can run anything well enough at 1080p60 (my TV's limit) on high settings, not necessarily ultra...really, if I want an upgrade, I'd invest in a new monitor aswell, or TV...for watching TV too my current monitor/TV is a Hitachi LED Full-HDTV, Japanese and fantastic, no input delay, none, I couldn't have asked for a better screen at that price range (~$240) I pre-ordered Project CARS 2 today, I'll see how that runs on my setup next week, racing wheel ready Every dollar spent waging the war on drugs is a dollar not spent genetically engineering nekos for domestic ownership.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10998	Posted - 2017.09.18 04:13:00 - [29] - Quote One Eyed King wrote: In fact, the GeForce Experience is designed just for optimizing frame rates and settings. Why would a GPU maker want to do that if they thought that people should only enjoy games at the ultra settings? Why would they want people to hold on to GPUs longer? It seems to me they understand that PC gaming is more than just for the elitists, despite what the #PCMasterRace thinks. That's a great piece of software, but it doesn't always work as intended. I suggest tweaking the settings yourself if you can. See what's right for you. Also, yeah, I cracked a few jokes here and there in my post, so people will take it for what they will. However, in my opinion, I just like shinies that can play at max settings. Some games are designed for High, with Ultra and Medium being an afterthought. Keeping up with technology is essential for a PC down the line. When I make recommendations, I try to let people know a few pieces of hardware that have a lot more years in than others for their prices. I don't blindly tell people to get the best of I know that's out of the picture, but I do try to to get them to get the best bang for their buck. As for companies limiting their playerbases, ultimately, they have to. There comes a point in development where cards are no longer feasible to play a current game because the company won't spend additional payed hours to try and make it work. I wouldn't call that narrow minded, but to each their own :p *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.
Joel II X Bacon with a bottle of Quafe 10998	Posted - 2017.09.18 04:18:00 - [30] - Quote TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Damn, old post much? Almost forgot we had this conversation about what a 2gb GTX950 can handle... I'm sticking to it, it can run anything well enough at 1080p60 (my TV's limit) on high settings, not necessarily ultra...really, if I want an upgrade, I'd invest in a new monitor aswell, or TV...for watching TV too my current monitor/TV is a Hitachi LED Full-HDTV, Japanese and fantastic, no input delay, none, I couldn't have asked for a better screen at that price range (~$240) I pre-ordered Project CARS 2 today, I'll see how that runs on my setup next week, racing wheel ready Did you overclock it? As for monitors, there are news of a 4k, 144Hz beast by Acer called the Predator X27, I think. I wants it, and I needs it. It'll probably cost a fortune, though. *Scouts United* Gk.0s & Quafes all day.

TooMany Names AlreadyTaken Going for the gold 5143	Posted - 2017.09.18 09:46:00 - [31] - Quote Joel II X wrote: TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: Damn, old post much? Almost forgot we had this conversation about what a 2gb GTX950 can handle... I'm sticking to it, it can run anything well enough at 1080p60 (my TV's limit) on high settings, not necessarily ultra...really, if I want an upgrade, I'd invest in a new monitor aswell, or TV...for watching TV too my current monitor/TV is a Hitachi LED Full-HDTV, Japanese and fantastic, no input delay, none, I couldn't have asked for a better screen at that price range (~$240) I pre-ordered Project CARS 2 today, I'll see how that runs on my setup next week, racing wheel ready Did you overclock it? As for monitors, there are news of a 4k, 144Hz beast by Acer called the Predator X27, I think. I wants it, and I needs it. It'll probably cost a fortune, though. I don't need to overclock it, and I don't wanna risk ruining it by doing that. Every dollar spent waging the war on drugs is a dollar not spent genetically engineering nekos for domestic ownership.


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

#NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá

#NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá

#NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá

#NekosForLife GÄ¥GùÑGû¦GÇ+GÇ+GùÇGùñGÄá