|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
byte modal
662
   |
Posted - 2016.04.23 18:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
I love you ratti.
And i am happy that you've ninja drop-kicked these hyper sensitive naysayers that always seem to know better, do it faster, and can predict the future square in the balls.
Great sample of work. Great summary. Great patience and endurance dealing with us here. Great understanding. CCP should be honored that you and staff are there.
Excited to what, if anything comes.
Most appreciative.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
662
|
Posted - 2016.04.23 18:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
And d!cks will continue to d!ck.
Press Attache wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:
It's obviously 16v16, 6v6 for demo purposes
So it will always be a lobby shooter. Your skills of deduction are astounding. You probably knew whodunnit in all Holmes books from the preface alone.CCP Rattati wrote:
You should probably know by now that we have plenty of ambition, just want to do the right things in the right order.
Your predecessors had a lot of ambition as well. But since you are aiming to make a 16 v 16 lobby shooter, you aren't really that ambitious. You typed nothing that changes what was said. 16v16 obviously 6v6 to demo. This isn't even a game and you sh!tposting so hard. Ambition is not your narrow definition.CCP Rattati wrote:
Double jump is enabled by a Gear called Jump Jets
Top sign you don't know what a hardcore shooter is, you want jump jets. Who promised a hardcore shooter? And why do mods define a hardcore anything? Besides, a good portion of the player base likes and wanted jumpy jump. Tribes was fun. Nothing wrong with fun.
Anyway, best of luck making a cookie cutter lobby shooter. I'll be off looking for devs who want to make new games, not just respin a mashup of UT2003 and BF2142, with less players.
My comments above, in bold.
Why are you still here again? I kinda figured breathing was too beneath you. Everything else seems to be. Good luck looking for more devs to troll. It's a game. Petulance is unbecoming.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
668
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
The irony is that you are assuming a series of your own hypotheticals where the end stage never evolves past your assumptions of that end. All the while, criticizing another of doing eactly what you are doing but concluding the opposite. It's a silly premise and means nothing more than an "i know you are but what am I?" equivalent. That you don't see it and contiue, is what encourages the snark.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
671
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 13:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:XxBlazikenxX wrote:What's the point of an MMO shooter if it can't even play the part of "shooter" right?
Rattati said specifically that they are focusing on making the gameplay as pristine as possible... then adding in MORE mmo elements. There is no point in an MMO shooter without the MMO! I'd rather have none at all than a shooter like everyone else has, but with no MMO. And you can't add MMO after the fact. It needs to be designed in from the start, or the limitations of what you've designed will limit what you can do later. If you DO add MMO later, you have to redesign. The only way they can add MMO later is if they actually design it in from the start, but somehow make it passive. Do you see CCP doing that?
Not for nothing, but im not sure the phrase "focus on" exactly translates to not considerate of other future development.
You're still assuming so much more than what the evidence suggests. Were you in preproduction meetings? Have you reviewed their timeline or milestone objectives? Have you sat with any developer to QC their code to see what is or is not being planned for?
People were all hot n bothered jumping to short-sighted and irrational conclusions based off a gameplay sequence and the brief uninterested ramblings of someone who probably knows nothing about the game to begin with except for a few superficial bullet points. I know MY boss is an idiot. More so when he tries to pitch projects he is ignorant of. But that's another topic.
Point: they were wrong.
Also, it's not a game. You never demo a sample just to test ideas and working blocks? Once or twice, we've prototyped a scaled back version of something just to test the logic and stability on it's own before translating those discovers to a larger scale.
Perspective helps. That and not assuming.
Assuming is bad. mmmk?
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
671
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 13:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:DeathwindRising wrote:
its not an MMO first of all. its flatout a lobby shooter.
they intend to add stuff later on that could make it feel more like a MMO.
And that's the problem.
It's not a problem. It doesn't exist yet. Your concern is valid as a hypothetical. Don't define your assumption as fact. This argument is pointless really because it was a tech demo. Not a release. Not a beta. Not an alpha. Nothing exists to draw your lines against yet so why hard line negative what-ifs?
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
682
|
Posted - 2016.04.25 04:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
I think that's fair.
My frustration in the feedback is the blurring of honest issues such as the dead space between the closure of dust and some indefinite possibility of a beta access at some unknown point in the future (maybe), and emotional opinions over development that doesn't even really exist yet as if the demo was the extent of their best intent.
Two different arguments. The first is reasonable and i agree. That sucks. The later is assumption. Though i admit things could still end that way, but it's just as likely to end in any other unpredictable way.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
682
|
Posted - 2016.04.25 04:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Also: i may have misread somethings (on my phone most of this weekend) but i think you're replying to community comments rather that what ratti said directly. I THINK there may be a break down or oversimplifaction of what's been said (unintentionally by the poster repeating their interpretation of what Ratti said). That MAY change the intent by implying something else by mistake. If you are responding to THAT, then maybe there's our disconnect?
Iderno.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
682
|
Posted - 2016.04.25 04:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:byte modal wrote:Also: i may have misread somethings (on my phone most of this weekend) but i think you're replying to community comments rather that what ratti said directly. I THINK there may be a break down or oversimplifaction of what's been said (unintentionally by the poster repeating their interpretation of what Ratti said). That MAY change the intent by implying something else by mistake. If you are responding to THAT, then maybe there's our disconnect?
Iderno. Yes, I AM replying to the community comments. That's why I quote them.
Why then?
I mean you can argue other poster's simplifications but that may not be what Ratti said or intends. Seems an empty fight.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
684
|
Posted - 2016.04.25 05:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Alena Asakura wrote:byte modal wrote:Alena Asakura wrote:byte modal wrote:Also: i may have misread somethings (on my phone most of this weekend) but i think you're replying to community comments rather that what ratti said directly. I THINK there may be a break down or oversimplifaction of what's been said (unintentionally by the poster repeating their interpretation of what Ratti said). That MAY change the intent by implying something else by mistake. If you are responding to THAT, then maybe there's our disconnect?
Iderno. Yes, I AM replying to the community comments. That's why I quote them. Why then? I mean you can argue other poster's simplifications but that may not be what Ratti said or intends. Seems an empty fight. I'm interested in what Rattati had to say. I read that and was quite encouraged. But then everyone jumps in with their own ideas and muddies the water. I'm replying to their posts, because they don't make sense to me.
Lol. But that will give you brain cancer. Argue the source if there's an argument to be made. Otherwise you're probably just raising your blood pressure for the hell of it.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
705
|
Posted - 2016.04.26 15:19:00 -
[10] - Quote
IMMORTAL WAR HERO wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:A couple of clarifications  List. i ball my eyes out when i saw the 16 vs 16 man this game cant even compete with battlefield or starwars befores its even started i spent like 5000$ on dust if im to spend more money i want it better not nerfed dust was 48 person shooter in my heart stop the nerf bat please
Wait wait wait.
You spent 5k? As in five THOUSAND dollars on a F2p game? Who are you? How old are you? Hell. I'll bring some friends and we can all run around your yard painting balling each other while you hold the controller pretending it's a real life DUST match for half that. That's a bargain!
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
|
|
byte modal
714
|
Posted - 2016.04.27 17:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Bump.
Cuz really, this needs it's own sticky. Barring that though, it should at LEAST be on the first page.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
932
|
Posted - 2016.08.01 14:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
For a moment....
...
for a moment, I honestly forgot about this post. I admit that excitement took hold. ...for a moment.
sigh.
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
byte modal
934
|
Posted - 2016.08.02 02:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
IMMORTAL WAR HERO wrote:CCP Rattati wrote:A couple of clarifications stuff Gotta head back to Harpa. Wazzzz Up space rat :)
bwah! i laughed out loud for some reason. thought you should know.
<3
kitten bacon taco (nom)
|
|
|
| |
|