|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
15176
|
Posted - 2016.04.23 21:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Kevall Longstride wrote:http://massivelyop.com/2016/04/23/eve-fanfest-2016-project-nova-will-include-territorial-warfare-link-with-eve/
This latest interview, done by Rattati today, explains things in more detail. That actually is starting to worry me because it looks like they're setting themselves up to make the same mistakes from a different approach. Keeping the scale too small is one obvious thing- another is that they may actually be planning to take it TOO slow. For example, not wanting to have vehicles until the infantry game is well-implemented: the big flaw in that is that, once all the infantry aspects are working smoothly, vehicles will throw a wrench into the system by completely changing how the game is played. It's like when cloaks were first added to Dust- it completely changed how the game is balanced by throwing new strengths and weaknesses at everything, no matter if they directly involved cloaks or not. I am hoping that with Nova being on PC that they will be able to have test servers and whatnot that weren't available in Dust. That way, more people can test new additions to try and mitigate any problems.
Second, since progression is different, people won't be so easily able to switch FotM. There is no way cloaking would have been as big a problem if it were relegated to a high progression item that only people who had spent lots of time as scouts could have gotten. And perhaps, they could have identified and fixed the problems before others could skill into it. Also remember, that there was a mass respec just when 1.8 released which exacerbated the problem.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
15176
|
Posted - 2016.04.23 21:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
DiablosMajora wrote:Two questions: 1) What can we do, right now, to help get this thing greenlit and speed development along?
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=227517&find=unread
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
15190
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
@ Mina
What would be the point of vehicles if you only got 3 FPS?
What would be the point of vehicles if v/av weren't balanced, and you got blown to bits in half a second by swarms instantly losing more than a full battle's worth of ISK, or conversely being so overpowered that people don't actually want to play in game modes with vehicles, or people just don't want to play at all because they don't want to deal with it?
This is a FPS first and foremost. They already have essentially 2 vehicle focused games in EVE and Valkyrie. If and when vehicles and AV are added, wouldn't it be best if they are added to an FPS game that isn't a power point, isn't broken by bugs and glitches (just look at the LAV glitch), and fits within the overall game play so that playing vehicles feels rewarding without being unfair?
Whether or not the game goes from project to product, it seems obvious they have their priorities straight.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
15194
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
james selim brownstein wrote:Lets stop bullying each other, and go to McDonald's Mass suicide via diabetes and heart disease?
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
15194
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 04:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
james selim brownstein wrote:One Eyed King wrote:james selim brownstein wrote:Lets stop bullying each other, and go to McDonald's Mass suicide via diabetes and heart disease? ok ok calm down vegan Please don't compare a McDonalds hamburger to Prime Rib or frankly anything that has any real meat content and was once part of a living thing.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
|
|
|