|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Aeon Amadi
13840
   |
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mina Longstrike wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Mina Longstrike wrote:Welp, if vehicles are only being added as an 'afterthought' I'm not interested.
Unless the game is designed around them being present and fully functioning as a role to begin with, they're going to experience all the same problems that we have in dust with them - No role, no ability to meaningfully participate in the majority of matches, people crying about them being too OP or too UP.
I'm not mad about the dust514 shutdown, or the move to PC. I'm am upset that they're taking a lot of the things that I loved about dust - things that provided a lot of nuance, complexity and all sorts of things that were interesting - and nixing them, and that what could be an opportunity to meaningfully fix some of the core problems of dust from the ground up, is not being taken. You have an opportunity here, don't squander it.
Don't make this a generic boring lobby shooter - you *can* make lobbies interesting when done right, **** even psuedo-moving around space in warbarges (or warbarge fleets) makes "lobbies" a bit more interesting. Given their vision is to evolve this new project far beyond what Dust could ever have been, and Rattati personally confirmed that planetary conquest gameplay will be returning in some form with large open maps and vehicles, I doubt they'll just be "an afterthought". Maybe someday PC will return, IF this game ends up not being vaporware, and maybe vehicles will be re-added, and hopefully they'll be balanced. You're operating something like seven layers deep on hypotheticals and wishful thinking.
Oh no, totally. The game will just be a 6v6 lobby shooter with six preset classes and one map. It's gonna be great.
Skype: Nomistrav
"Bastard at Heart"
|
Aeon Amadi
13842
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mina Longstrike wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Mina Longstrike wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Mina Longstrike wrote:Welp, if vehicles are only being added as an 'afterthought' I'm not interested.
Unless the game is designed around them being present and fully functioning as a role to begin with, they're going to experience all the same problems that we have in dust with them - No role, no ability to meaningfully participate in the majority of matches, people crying about them being too OP or too UP.
I'm not mad about the dust514 shutdown, or the move to PC. I'm am upset that they're taking a lot of the things that I loved about dust - things that provided a lot of nuance, complexity and all sorts of things that were interesting - and nixing them, and that what could be an opportunity to meaningfully fix some of the core problems of dust from the ground up, is not being taken. You have an opportunity here, don't squander it.
Don't make this a generic boring lobby shooter - you *can* make lobbies interesting when done right, **** even psuedo-moving around space in warbarges (or warbarge fleets) makes "lobbies" a bit more interesting. Given their vision is to evolve this new project far beyond what Dust could ever have been, and Rattati personally confirmed that planetary conquest gameplay will be returning in some form with large open maps and vehicles, I doubt they'll just be "an afterthought". Maybe someday PC will return, IF this game ends up not being vaporware, and maybe vehicles will be re-added, and hopefully they'll be balanced. You're operating something like seven layers deep on hypotheticals and wishful thinking. Oh no, totally. The game will just be a 6v6 lobby shooter with six preset classes and one map. It's gonna be great. Cute snark aeon, unfortunately I said none of those things. Didn't you have me blocked because you get butthurt way too easily?
The irony is over-fuckin'-whelming here.
Skype: Nomistrav
"Bastard at Heart"
|
Aeon Amadi
13842
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
Useful **** I'mma leave in here before I go to bed. In Iceland. Where Nova was. And stuff.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/2d/05/f7/2d05f7387a0ea1c14eaeebce09402891.jpg
Skype: Nomistrav
"Bastard at Heart"
|
Aeon Amadi
13851
|
Posted - 2016.04.24 03:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mina Longstrike wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:
The irony is over-fuckin'-whelming here.
No, it really isn't. You've entered a conversation just to snark about things unrelated to what I actually said and ridicule me, because apparently acting like an ass is easier than addressing the original point about vehicles being an afterthought and them maybe being included after several nested layers of "ifs", instead of being incorporated as a part of core design. It never fails to surprise me how small and petty of an individual you can be aeon. I'm fully expecting more snark back on this, because well, that's all you do. Oh wait, no that's not entirely truthful, you do also try to turn it around and make it out like I was attacking you to begin with, because you have a giant persecution complex - and people cant disagree with you or your method without you feeling attacked.
See you in Alpha, Mina 
Skype: Nomistrav
"Bastard at Heart"
|
|
|
| |
|