DUST Search - What do you want to see on Fanfest related to NoTLegion?

Varoth Drac wrote:

I'd like to see a proper gameplay demo, with people actually fighting, not just walking around shooting like the legion demo.

I'd also like a detailed description of the design goals. Why, how and who people will be shooting in the face.

What I'd like to see from the new game:

Cooperative PVE with sandbox PVP.
Action that is as intense as Dust.
Similar ttk to Dust.
The same level of customisation as Dust, but with more intuitive module design.
No auto matchmaking team PVP. Nobody should be forced to cooperate with random blueberries in PVP.
Easy social communication.
Mind transfer but no gear transfer. Gear should be bought at the location of the battle. This would greatly improve the immersion into the EVE universe. Items in EVE must be physically transported. Though there's no reason suits couldn't be painted in your colours before you spawn in.
EWAR, stealth and triage tactics in addition to run and gun. We don't want the game variety reduced to just AR514-everyone's an assault/slayerlogi/slayerscout-gameplay that some people have seemed to advocate over the whole life of Dust.
If vehicles are in they should be good. Extra turrets should be good too. None of this "but a man on foot should be as good as a tank" nonsense.
A safe game mode for newer players to not get stomped into the ground by vets.

Not asking much lol!

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
4lbert Wesker Intara Direct Action Caldari State 649	Posted - 2016.04.18 01:42:00 - [1] - Quote I want to see full battle. 16 vs 16 ADS pilots 2 tankers on each side WESKER S.T.A.R.S. is not my corporation!
DAAAA BEAST Corrosive Synergy 4191	Posted - 2016.04.18 02:47:00 - [2] - Quote I don't want to disappoint you, but I doubt you're going to see more than a trailer with stuff that you probably;y won't recognize. I want some info on the game name, characteristics of the game, players per match, price and hopefully alpha eta. DAAAA FAIRY BEAST I'm just like an exotic fruit.
danthrax martin Bad Blueberries 919	Posted - 2016.04.18 02:53:00 - [3] - Quote I just want something to get hooked on again. =ƒñÿ=ƒÿ£=ƒñÿ Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana
Operative 1174 Uuali True Companion Planetary Requisitions 1600	Posted - 2016.04.18 03:26:00 - [4] - Quote Full playable alpha test demo or keep DUST server online. Really, how hard is it to have a map, a tank, a rifleman and an opponent? CCP logic GÇô We fix what doesn't need breaking.
One Eyed King Nos Nothi 14978	Posted - 2016.04.18 04:05:00 - [5] - Quote Art. Maybe some animation and demo type stuff. I also hope that there is some exposition as to the direction they hope to take the game. Stuff like game modes, Factional Warfare, PC. Hopefully if they have enough idea where they are headed they will give us an idea about vet rewards. Frankly anything is better than silence. Former CEO of the Land of the BIind. Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
james selim brownstein NECROM0NGERS 311	Posted - 2016.04.18 04:51:00 - [6] - Quote TRAILER HYPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! n++Gòª¦¦¦¦-ç¦+¦+¦+¦+ WAITING FOR DEPLOYMENTGòñGöÇGöÇGöÇ Gò¡Gê¬Gò«n+ên+¦n++n+¦n+ë
LOOKMOM NOHANDS 885	Posted - 2016.04.18 05:51:00 - [7] - Quote james selim brownstein wrote: TRAILER HYPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! This. We all know CCP does trailers like no other. If that's really all they have to show after all this time and headache I can not wait to forget CCP even exists. Why should I have to make excuses for a game developer so I can give them money? I have lost any bit of excitement towards the announcement just because I have simply been let down by CCP too many times. We will find out in a couple of days.
Monkey MAC Rough Riders.. 3720	Posted - 2016.04.18 08:03:00 - [8] - Quote What I want to see: CONCORD Gear: What better way to make the racial difference more pronounced then by making the trunk weapons and it's Concord. Weapon Roster outline: I'm not talking some nambypamby excuse that consists of a few weapons. I'm talking defined weapon classes with 25 leaf weapons per class. (5 variants X 5 factions) Dropsuit Roster outline: As above a full roster proposal, ideally 3 suit specialisations per suit class. Giving 15 leaf dropsuits in total. Vehicle Roster Outline: As many of you know I wanted a lot more from the vehicles in DUST, I want Phoniex to be proposing more vehicles than I can shake a stick at. Socket Set Proposal: How the sockets and sets are gonna be dealt with. What I will probably get: "We might have a few assault rifles" "Dropsuits exist" Demo of pre rendered stuff we likely never see again. They call me the Monkey - I like to jump off sh** and piss RE's all over your tank! Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior Lvl 3
james selim brownstein NECROM0NGERS 312	Posted - 2016.04.18 08:24:00 - [9] - Quote LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: james selim brownstein wrote: TRAILER HYPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! This. We all know CCP does trailers like no other. If that's really all they have to show after all this time and headache I can not wait to forget CCP even exists. Why should I have to make excuses for a game developer so I can give them money? I have lost any bit of excitement towards the announcement just because I have simply been let down by CCP too many times. We will find out in a couple of days. I wouldn't be surprised if CCP came on stage and said this at the start of fanfest - "Hello, as you might know, we have a new FPS in the works, and most of you are asking the same question (When are we getting any information about this new game?) ... #Soon" n++Gòª¦¦¦¦-ç¦+¦+¦+¦+ WAITING FOR DEPLOYMENTGòñGöÇGöÇGöÇ Gò¡Gê¬Gò«n+ên+¦n++n+¦n+ë
LOOKMOM NOHANDS 887	Posted - 2016.04.18 08:58:00 - [10] - Quote james selim brownstein wrote: LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: james selim brownstein wrote: TRAILER HYPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! This. We all know CCP does trailers like no other. If that's really all they have to show after all this time and headache I can not wait to forget CCP even exists. Why should I have to make excuses for a game developer so I can give them money? I have lost any bit of excitement towards the announcement just because I have simply been let down by CCP too many times. We will find out in a couple of days. I wouldn't be surprised if CCP came on stage and said this at the start of fanfest - "Hello, as you might know, we have a new FPS in the works, and most of you are asking the same question (When are we getting any information about this new game?) ... #Soon" SoonGäó but yep that would not shock me at all. My only hope right now is that Rattati and the Shanghai team did not hit some barrier that caused them to give up on 1.3 and say okay Dust is getting shut down just for fun.

Varoth Drac Dead Man's Game Preatoriani 2208	Posted - 2016.04.18 11:22:00 - [11] - Quote I'd like to see a proper gameplay demo, with people actually fighting, not just walking around shooting like the legion demo. I'd also like a detailed description of the design goals. Why, how and who people will be shooting in the face. What I'd like to see from the new game: Cooperative PVE with sandbox PVP. Action that is as intense as Dust. Similar ttk to Dust. The same level of customisation as Dust, but with more intuitive module design. No auto matchmaking team PVP. Nobody should be forced to cooperate with random blueberries in PVP. Easy social communication. Mind transfer but no gear transfer. Gear should be bought at the location of the battle. This would greatly improve the immersion into the EVE universe. Items in EVE must be physically transported. Though there's no reason suits couldn't be painted in your colours before you spawn in. EWAR, stealth and triage tactics in addition to run and gun. We don't want the game variety reduced to just AR514-everyone's an assault/slayerlogi/slayerscout-gameplay that some people have seemed to advocate over the whole life of Dust. If vehicles are in they should be good. Extra turrets should be good too. None of this "but a man on foot should be as good as a tank" nonsense. A safe game mode for newer players to not get stomped into the ground by vets. Not asking much lol!
DanielCM TO THE DEATH 54	Posted - 2016.04.18 12:19:00 - [12] - Quote 4lbert Wesker wrote: I want to see full battle. 16 vs 16 ADS pilots 2 tankers on each side If it's on pc and it's 16v16 I will laugh and then cry
LOOKMOM NOHANDS 887	Posted - 2016.04.18 12:20:00 - [13] - Quote Varoth Drac wrote: I'd like to see a proper gameplay demo, with people actually fighting, not just walking around shooting like the legion demo. I'd also like a detailed description of the design goals. Why, how and who people will be shooting in the face. What I'd like to see from the new game: Cooperative PVE with sandbox PVP. Action that is as intense as Dust. Similar ttk to Dust. The same level of customisation as Dust, but with more intuitive module design. No auto matchmaking team PVP. Nobody should be forced to cooperate with random blueberries in PVP. Easy social communication. Mind transfer but no gear transfer. Gear should be bought at the location of the battle. This would greatly improve the immersion into the EVE universe. Items in EVE must be physically transported. Though there's no reason suits couldn't be painted in your colours before you spawn in. EWAR, stealth and triage tactics in addition to run and gun. We don't want the game variety reduced to just AR514-everyone's an assault/slayerlogi/slayerscout-gameplay that some people have seemed to advocate over the whole life of Dust. If vehicles are in they should be good. Extra turrets should be good too. None of this "but a man on foot should be as good as a tank" nonsense. A safe game mode for newer players to not get stomped into the ground by vets. Not asking much lol! Wow you don't have high hopes at all. Don't forget a full flushed out player economy.
james selim brownstein NECROM0NGERS 312	Posted - 2016.04.18 12:42:00 - [14] - Quote these forums are really slow now... lol n++Gòª¦¦¦¦-ç¦+¦+¦+¦+ WAITING FOR DEPLOYMENTGòñGöÇGöÇGöÇ Gò¡Gê¬Gò«n+ên+¦n++n+¦n+ë
Varoth Drac Dead Man's Game Preatoriani 2208	Posted - 2016.04.18 14:04:00 - [15] - Quote LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: stuff Wow you don't have high hopes at all. Don't forget a full flushed out player economy. I was thinking best case scenario. If it's Dust but no Eve connection, no Faction warfare and no PC, I'd still ok, so long as the game actually works on release with a decent frame rate. Imagine Dust at 60 fps, which by the way CCP, seems to be the standard fps fps these days. It would seem like a bit of a missed opportunity though.
True Adamance Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 22319	Posted - 2016.04.18 17:07:00 - [16] - Quote 4lbert Wesker wrote: I want to see full battle. 16 vs 16 ADS pilots 2 tankers on each side Wouldn't that be cool. I'll keep and eye out for anything relating to Not Dust but I suspect the CPM will beat me to it when it comes to reporting anything. Sneaky bastards have some kind of inside information... as if they're in contact with CCP or something. Waves that dye the land gold. Blessed breath to nurture life in a land of wheat. A path the Sef descend drawn in ash.
Derpty Derp Dead Man's Game 1384	Posted - 2016.04.18 17:20:00 - [17] - Quote Eve connection, whereby eve pilots have to deal with the logistics of getting everyone and their supplies to the battles. More of an MMO approach than a lobby shooter. Yes, I am aware of how "off target" I am with this... But people can dream.
LOOKMOM NOHANDS 887	Posted - 2016.04.18 17:58:00 - [18] - Quote Varoth Drac wrote: LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: Varoth Drac wrote: stuff Wow you don't have high hopes at all. Don't forget a full flushed out player economy. I was thinking best case scenario. If it's Dust but no Eve connection, no Faction warfare and no PC, I'd still ok, so long as the game actually works on release with a decent frame rate. Imagine Dust at 60 fps, which by the way CCP, seems to be the standard fps fps these days. It would seem like a bit of a missed opportunity though. I feel like CCP learned they do not want anything to do with Eve integration. They are just too (rightly?) worried about serious negative effects on the Eve economy and I am completely cool with this. I think I would be most happy with a bit of an Eve clone with suits and guns instead of ships and turrets. I long for the open world FPS and player driven economy we were promised so long ago. The lobby shooter with once a day matches as the "end game" simply left a lot of us with a certain sadness inside.
SOGZ PANDA WarRavens Imperium Eden 367	Posted - 2016.04.19 07:51:00 - [19] - Quote 4lbert Wesker wrote: I want to see full battle. 16 vs 16 ADS pilots 2 tankers on each side Why are we so set on 16v16. What is so good about limiting the numbers in the battle? I want ***** 250v250 with tanks battling other tanks that are trying to blow up shield energizers of bases. Infantry just slaying into each other with different variants of suits that are were tactically picked out to fight the other races weaknesses. Full on cluster ** of attrition, fighting for base resources/base ownership. dust is life... ... uncertain, and usually pretty dissapointing.
LOOKMOM NOHANDS 889	Posted - 2016.04.19 08:10:00 - [20] - Quote SOGZ PANDA wrote: 4lbert Wesker wrote: I want to see full battle. 16 vs 16 ADS pilots 2 tankers on each side Why are we so set on 16v16. What is so good about limiting the numbers in the battle? I want ***** 250v250 with tanks battling other tanks that are trying to blow up shield energizers of bases. Infantry just slaying into each other with different variants of suits that are were tactically picked out to fight the other races weaknesses. Full on cluster ** of attrition, fighting for base resources/base ownership. I want GêP vs GêP aka not just another stupid lobby game. Give us open world already. We have been so stupified by the meager delivery in Dust that we have forgotten about the promises of MMO and a player driven economy. soonGäó just never seemed to arrive.



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page