you really can't talk about somebody else's money like that.

With all due respect, I can talk about whatever I want >.>

With all due respect, I can talk about whatever I want >.>

Then please understand when you speak about whatever you wish others may call you out on such trifling details as 'facts' or 'evidence'.

Honestly, programming is hard work, and the speed at which you code is by no means a 'set' rate. You can't talk about features in a rate / month like you can talk about how many products a factory can make per hour. Sometimes the development process is swift, sometimes it is not.

To compare to EVE online is a bit unfair, as the Devs have over the course of the past few years been neck deep in completely reworking key features. Many of those features upon being released saw NO actual change to a player's gameplay, but allowed the devs the needed refactoring / clean up needed to implement new features down the line.

In other words, some of the most programmer intensive tasks show the least amount of change to the end user experience. However those same tasks are critical for keeping a code base that can still function years down the line, or for features to be added in a fraction of the time what would have been required before such refactoring (if they could have been feasible at all).

For you to constantly compare single snapshots of progress is frankly indicative of your lack of understanding of the coding process, and the realities game devs face when trying to keep a long term project such as an MMO or long-term world alive and healthy.

Look to the constant cries of port, and how Rattati has stated numerous times that the code base is riddled with legacy issues and technical debt that dampens forward movement. Have you ever stopped to consider that the efforts to clear that away, and thus redesign the system (for perhaps an eventual port) would take months and months of effort just so that the end result is the same game we have today, albeit with hefty backend refactor to allow for other updates such as powercores or moddable weapons?

MMO Game development (good development at least) is not a race from new feature to new feature. It is a marathon that is all about keeping the long term goals in mind while also making it to checkpoints of new releases. Still, the ultimate goal should always be in service to that long term marathon and if short term goals need be shifted or moved to align to that then that is simply a part of the development process.

Ahoy!

Sorry to hear that you're experiencing such difficulties with DUST 514. Please post bug reports in the Technical Support/Bugs Forum, or use the bug reporting tool. Thank you for your feedback!

Regarding whether the post is a rant or not, this video comes to mind.

I reported 2 bug's on 21.09.2014 tro the reporting tool. From that day they were not filtered, no one from CCP responded to me about bug's I reported, and they are still in-game.
On close beta I reported bug with DS hovering over Uplink instantly kill everyone that respawn on it, and it is still in-game.

So as I understand, your job is to inform players about places to report bug's, not actually pin those reports on piece of paper to someones 'task wall' that will fix it.. in future - is that correct?

Same here about invisible walls, same responce.
Nothing fixed.

The only real **** up i have witnessed is the black screen. I fell through the map only one time.

My comment about sitting down was a nice way of telling you not to challenge a GM (especially Archduke). Stand up for things point out what is wrong but be prepared to presnt evidence.

Example

I call you a cheater. You deny this, of couse, but so would everyone else. However, without proof showinfcmy statement as true, I lose credibility.

So saying "fix what is broken" but showing no evidence to validate what you claimto be broken is a futile path.

With all due respect, I can talk about whatever I want >.>

Working on Warlords 1.3

I've said it 100 ******* times. The problems in Dust cannot be blamed solely on CCP. Face it, there are huge corps full of even bigger assholes who take the time to use exploits, glitches and some broken mechanics. If the fucktards would stop running off new players, we would be in a much bstter condition. We shouldn't grease the cogs of Dust with tears and hatred.

Invisible walls near every corner (just try to throw grenade).
LAG (everybody knows this one, the major issue).
Disconnections and freezes (still in game).
Bugs (last one is LAV under map and blackscreen).
Unbalance (what makes FoTM hunts).
No racials and implement (due bad optomization).

I just love it when the "money made from DUST goes towards EVE" argument comes up. The funniest thing ever

wanting bug fixes same day is impossible, ignorant, and just plain thoughtless.

How about.... 2 years down the line?

CCP has been good about fixing certain bugs, other bugs are harder to find the fixes for. How would you like to take a fine tooth comb and run through hundreds of line of code to find what is causing a bug. I guarantee you it's not as easy as you would think.

Uh......... if it were my job I would do it or be fired, is that not how it works where you live?

Don't get me wrong. The bugs suck, but what do you expect from a tiny dev team? Aside from babsitting the community and trying to appease players with their cries for other crap; when do you expect they have the time to sift through and test every single line of code? And even then there's the chance that if they do fix something in a line it will affect something else so they then need to figure out a way to write a new code that will prevent that from happening.

As I stated, we have no idea what their day consists of if you have an issue with the game just play something else like all the sane people and just keep popping back in from time to time to check on crap.

Besides being interested in performance and the future of the game, I have no issues with anything else concerning Dust. Honestly, I was just trying to give you a rational logical response.

Then please understand when you speak about whatever you wish others may call you out on such trifling details as 'facts' or 'evidence'.

Honestly, programming is hard work, and the speed at which you code is by no means a 'set' rate. You can't talk about features in a rate / month like you can talk about how many products a factory can make per hour. Sometimes the development process is swift, sometimes it is not.

To compare to EVE online is a bit unfair, as the Devs have over the course of the past few years been neck deep in completely reworking key features. Many of those features upon being released saw NO actual change to a player's gameplay, but allowed the devs the needed refactoring / clean up needed to implement new features down the line.

In other words, some of the most programmer intensive tasks show the least amount of change to the end user experience. However those same tasks are critical for keeping a code base that can still function years down the line, or for features to be added in a fraction of the time what would have been required before such refactoring (if they could have been feasible at all).

For you to constantly compare single snapshots of progress is frankly indicative of your lack of understanding of the coding process, and the realities game devs face when trying to keep a long term project such as an MMO or long-term world alive and healthy.

Look to the constant cries of port, and how Rattati has stated numerous times that the code base is riddled with legacy issues and technical debt that dampens forward movement. Have you ever stopped to consider that the efforts to clear that away, and thus redesign the system (for perhaps an eventual port) would take months and months of effort just so that the end result is the same game we have today, albeit with hefty backend refactor to allow for other updates such as powercores or moddable weapons?

MMO Game development (good development at least) is not a race from new feature to new feature. It is a marathon that is all about keeping the long term goals in mind while also making it to checkpoints of new releases. Still, the ultimate goal should always be in service to that long term marathon and if short term goals need be shifted or moved to align to that then that is simply a part of the development process.

Then tell/prove me otherwise.
Everytime when i asked before everytime, no answer just muddy muddy waters around ;)

EvE improvement and new content
EvE Valkyrie announced
EvE Gunjack announced

and Dust?!

Not so much, skins warbarge what else two maps (third one was broken), still invisible walls, unbalanced, broken mechanics etc.

It is only me who see unbalanced effort in CCP developement?
Oh wait that is agains rulez XD

What i need to prove?
Players (me included) spent money here and we have no fixes, no implements.
But EvE have all cream, Gunjack was made and VAlkyrie is behind corner too.
How i think is just pure logic.
Dust is profitable, but bigheads like to use profit somewhere else.

Oh yeah, and you also say there are no fixes and such, so...

Warlords 1.0 Overview & Patch Notes
Warlords 1.1 Overview & Patch Notes
Warlords 1.2 Overview & Patch Notes
Introducing Warlords 1.2 Planetary Conquest Revamp
Introducing Warlords 1.2 Progression System
[Feedback] Hotfix FoxFour
DUST 514 Development Roadmap

Postapo, CCP Shanghai has a small team working on DUST 514. If it had an army of developers the size of EA of Ubisoft's labs... well it would still have bugs. My point is the team works on the "low hanging fruit" issues. If they were to tackle a massive problem it might take them months of focusing on ONE bug. We would go months without new features, balancing, or minor bug fixes just for the sake of a single bug.

That is not an effective use of a team's time.

Still invisible walls.
Still broken physics.
Still disconnection.
Still falls through maps.

and most importantly

Still LAG