I never actually indicated I wanted dropship speed cut in half. The issue, is basically, that dropships cannot be made to so effortlessly run away from the threat of swarms. At best, range of swarms needs to be suitable for it to require active attempt at evasion to survive, whereas with even the current pitiful range, dropship pilots need to merely hit the thrust slightly to be easily protected from any threat. I also stated I was okay with making swarms turn more poorly, not the other way around. I certainly wasn't asking for the whole list he acts like I propose.

Furthermore, his supposed attempts to claim "contradictions" is simple: I'm looking for actual balance, not pitching just a nerf or a buff. But actual gameplay. That does involve some give and take. The 400m tracking range thing is a huge pain point for dropships, and I agree, we can help dropship pilots out there, but we need some lock range to make swarms viable.

Tesfa completely was unable to comprehend why we need MORE than 150m lock range to engage at 150m. Hint: Because we can't fire at 151m.



This could easily be said about yourself. Derrith, you've never found a single dropship nerf you didn't whine about. Your opinion on dropships has the same weight and value of Judge's, which were useless.

I literally just proposed nerfing the part of swarms that I've heard the most complaints from vehicle users about, for years. But apparently I just hate vehicle users. Seriously, you know why vehicle users tick me off? If anyone touches their kingdom of OPness, they misrepresent the crud out of everyone until the conversation dies in a fire.

Because the ADS should not get any help. I've seen the numbers, it was nerfed for good reason, and it still wasn't nerfed enough. If you saw what I saw, you would not even question my feedback.

Yeah i know the Gallente rifle need some love. but what about the breach rail rifle? i mean as far as i see, it needs a little love in the charge up time

He meant the vanilla rail rifle. :)